Genome-wide association study of copy number variation in flax through the lens of genome integrity

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Classical methods for identification of genetic variants associated with certain macroscopic phenotypic traits are, as a rule, limited to analyses of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Copy number variations, and more broadly structural variants may provide a plethora of useful information due to the magnitude of the changes they induce. However, their use in genome-wide association studies is seriously limited mostly due to the uncertainties in their discovery (i.e., failure to resolve an event with nucleotide resolution) by computational algorithms from genomic data. Nevertheless, in certain cases, such analyses are possible and may still yield valuable results. Our recent work has revealed genetic variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms) possibly related to phenotypic traits determining fibre quality. Here, we decided to extend the analyses to structural variants, namely copy number variations. Importantly, we use a novel high-coverage dataset allowing for accurate prediction of copy number variations. Overall, we compiled a list of 41 candidate genes associated with five quantitative phenotypic traits. Furthermore, the genome stability metric developed earlier facilitated stratification of copy number variant loci with regard to their stability. On the whole, our analyses suggest that the genomic regions less resilient to external and internal stresses are more susceptible to changes associated with the studied phenotypic traits.

About the authors

M. A Duk

St. Petersburg State University

St. Petersburg, Russia

A. A Kanapin

St. Petersburg State University

St. Petersburg, Russia

T. A Rozhmina

Flax Institute - a separate subdivision of the Federal Scientific Centerfor Bast Crops

Thorzhok, Tver Region, Russia

A. A Samsonova

St. Petersburg State University

Email: a.samsonova@spbu.ru
St. Petersburg, Russia

References

  1. S. V. Nuzhdin, M. L. Friesen, and L. M. McIntyre, Trends Genet., 28, 421 (2012).
  2. P. K. Gupta, P. L. Kulwal, and V. Jaiswal, Adv. Genet., 104, 75 (2019).
  3. T. A. Manolio, et al., Nature, 461, 747 (2009).
  4. E. E. Eichler, et al., Nat. Rev. Genet., 11, 446 (2010).
  5. P. H. Sudmant, et al., Nature, 526, 75 (2015).
  6. T. H. Shaikh, Curr Genetic Med. Reports, 5, 183 (2017).
  7. A. Zmienko, et al., Plant Cell, 32, 1797 (2020).
  8. A. Dolatabadian, D. A. Patel, D. Edwards, and J. Batley, Theor. Appl. Genet., 130, 2479 (2017).
  9. C. Goudenhooft, A. Bourmaud, and C. Baley, Front. Plant Sci., 10, 411 (2019).
  10. C. Goudenhooft, A. Bourmaud, and C. Baley, Industrial Crops & Products, 97, 56 (2017).
  11. E. J. Mellerowicz and T. A. Gorshkova, J. Exp. Bot., 63, 551 (2012).
  12. M. J. Roach, et al., Plant Physiol., 156, 1351 (2011).
  13. T. Gorshkova, et al., Sci. Rep.-UK, 8, 14570 (2018).
  14. T. Rozhmina, M. Bankin, A. Samsonova, et al., Data Brief, 37, 107224 (2021).
  15. М. А. Дук, А. А. Канапин, А. А. Самсонова и др., Биофизика, 67, 234 (2022).
  16. A. Abyzov, A. E. Urban, M. Snyder, and M. Gerstein, Genome Res., 21, 974 (2011).
  17. J. Wang and Z. Zhang, Genom Proteom Bioinform., 19, 629-640 (2021).
  18. F. M. You and S. Cloutier, Methods Protoc., 3 (2020). doi: 10.3390/mps3020028
  19. A. Kanapin, et al., Mol. Plant Microbe Interact., 33, 1112 (2020).
  20. A. Kanapin, et al., Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23, 14536 (2022).

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies