A complex system of the mouse brain - selection for successful solution of a cognitive test

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The study provides a review of experimental research on selection of mice that yields positive results. The selection of mice was high (the task required mice to understand that an object which has become invisible, still exists and could be found) and poor performance in a cognitive test. The results obtained revealed better short term memory in mice, selected for high performance scores, and that these mice also showed higher performance in tests for novelty and attention. This suggests that differences between mice used in the experiment are associated not only with cognitive abilities in tests, but also with more pronounced “executive functions”.

About the authors

I. I Poletaeva

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: ingapoletaeva@mail.ru
Moscow, Russia

O. V Perepelkina

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Moscow, Russia

Z. A Zorina

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Moscow, Russia

References

  1. S. M. Tomchik and R. L. Davis, Nature, 453 (7199), 1192 (2008).
  2. Z. Reznikova, Anim. Cogn., 23 (6), 1143- (2020). doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01423-x
  3. Behavioral Genetics of the Mouse, Ed. by W. E. Crusio, F. Sluyter, R. T. Gerlai, and S. Pietropaolo, Genetics of Behavioral Phenotypes (Cambridge University Press, 2013), v. 1, pp. 357.
  4. А. Зорина и А. А. Смирнова, О чем рассказали "говорящие обезьяны. Способны ли высшие животные оперировать символами? (Изд-во "Языки славянской культуры", 2008).
  5. E. I. Rogaev, Front. Genet., 3 (3), ID 00045 (2012). doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00045
  6. A. Ferndndez-Blanco and M. Dierssen, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21, 9039 (2020). doi: 10.3390/ijms21239039
  7. M. Mameli and P. Bateson, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 366, 436 (2011). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0174
  8. A. Manning, In: Psychobiology: Biological basis of behavior, Ed. by J. McGough (Acad Press, N-Y, London, 1971), pp. 1-52.
  9. W. C. Rothenbuhler, Am. Zool., 4, 111 (1964)
  10. И. И. Полетаева, Природа, № 8, 150 (1999).
  11. R. W. Williams, R. C. Strom, and D. Goldowitz, J. Neurosci., 18 (1), 138 (1998).
  12. P. Bateson and M. Mameli, Dev. Psychobiol., 49 (8), 818 (2007). doi: 10.1002/dev.20277
  13. B. Anderson, Am. J. Ment. Retard., 99 (1), 50 (1994).
  14. Л. В. Крушинский, Элементарная рассудочная деятельность (Изд-во МГУ, М., 1976).
  15. I. I. Poletaeva and Z. A. Zorina, Russ. J. Cogn. Sci., 1 (3), 31 (2014).
  16. A. R. Jensen, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 702 (1), 103 (1993). doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb17244.x
  17. B. Anderson, In Novartis Found Symp., discussion 90-5, 233, 79 (2000).
  18. L. D. Matzel and S. Kolata, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 34 (1), 23 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.002
  19. S. Kolata, K. Light, H. C. Grossman, et al., Learn. Mem., 14 (1), 22 (2007). doi: 10.1101/lm.408507
  20. M. J. Galsworthy, J. L. Paya-Cano, L. Liu, et al., Behav. Genet., 35 (5), 675 (2005). doi: 10.1007/s10519-005-3423-9
  21. N. M. Ben Abdallah, J. Fuss, M. Trusel, et al., Exp. Neurol. 227 (1), 42 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.09.008
  22. S. Kolata, K. Light, and L. D. Matzel, Intelligence, 36, 619 (2008), doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2007.12.001
  23. S. R. O. Nilsson, J. Alsioa,. E. M. Somervillec, and P. G. Clifton, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 56, 1 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.015
  24. B. Kolisnyk, M. A. Al-Onaizi,. P. H. F. Hirata, et al., J. Neurosci., 33 (37), 14908 (2013).
  25. О. В. Перепелкина и И. И. Полетаева, Докл. РАН, 499, 322 (2021).
  26. О. В. Перепелкина, Н. В. Маркина, В. А. Голибродо и др., Журн. высш. нерв деятельности им. И.П. Павлова, 61 (6),742 (2011).
  27. K. S. Van Driel and J. C. Talling, Behav. Brain Res., 159 (2), 243 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.11.005
  28. P. Georgiou, T. M. Zanos, X. Mou, et al., Nat. Neurosci., 25 (9), 1191 (2022). doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01146-x
  29. И. И. Полетаева и З. А. Зорина, в сб. Формирование поведения животных в норме и патологии: к 100-летию со дня рождения Л. В. Крушинского (1911- 1984), Сост. И. И. Полетаева и З. А. Зорина (ЯСК, М., 2013), сс. 2-8.
  30. R. M. O'Connor, B. C. Finger, P. J. Flor, and J. F. Cryan, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 639 (1-3), 123 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.02.059
  31. J. L. Brigman, E. M. Powell, G. Mittleman, and J. W. Young, Physiol. Behav., 107 (5), 666 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.12.024
  32. D. A. Hamilton and J. L. Brigman, Genes, Brain and Behavior, 14, 4 (2015).
  33. A. E. Reimer, A. R. De Oliveira, and M. L. Brandao, Neuroscience, 219, 72 (2012).
  34. R. R. Rozeske, D. Jercog, N. Karalis, et al., Neuron, 97 (4), 898 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.044
  35. J. Talpos and M. Shoaib, Handbook Exp. Pharmacol., 228, 191 (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16522-6_6
  36. L. Gimdnez-Llort, S. N. Schiffmann, T. Shmidt, et al., Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 87 (1), 42 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2006.05.004
  37. Q. Li, S. Y. Chan, K. K. Wong, et al., Behav. Genet., 46 (4), 529-537 (2016).
  38. J. R. Homberg, E. J. Kyzar, M. Nguyen, et al., Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 65, 292 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.013
  39. C. Locurto, A. Benoit, C. Crowley, and A. Miele, J.Comp. Psychol., 120 (4), 378 (2006).
  40. H. M. Ene, N. Z. Kara., N. Barak, et al., Acta Neuropsychiatr., 28 (2), 85 (2016). DOI: 10.1017/ neu.2015.53

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies