Determining the Phase Composition of Copper Ferrite Samples by a Standardless Differential Dissolution Method

A. A. Pochtar’; Почтарь А. А.; O. V. Komova; Комова О. В.; O. V. Netskina; Нецкина О. В.

doi:10.31857/S0002337X23010153

Determining the Phase Composition of Copper Ferrite Samples by a Standardless Differential Dissolution Method

Authors: Pochtar’ A.A.¹, Komova O.V.¹, Netskina O.V.¹
Affiliations:
1. Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia
Issue: Vol 59, No 1 (2023)
Pages: 46-53
Section: Articles
URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0002-337X/article/view/140116
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002337X23010153
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OTMGJQ
ID: 140116

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

This paper reports the use of a differential dissolution stoichiographic method for determining the phase composition of catalysts for ammine borane hydrolysis and hydrothermolysis [1, 2]. Cu1–xFe2+xO4 copper ferrite samples were prepared using layer-by-layer combustion, dried, and then calcined at different temperatures. We describe conditions that make it possible to detect and quantitatively determine various phases in the composition of amorphous and crystalline materials with the spinel structure and compare differential dissolution and X-ray diffraction results.

Keywords

differential dissolution method, phase composition, stoichiometry, spinel structure

References

Komova O.V., Odegova G.V., Gorlova A.M., Bulavchenko O.A., Pochtar A.A., Netskina O.V., Simagina V.I. Copper–Iron Mixed Oxide Catalyst Precursors Prepared by Glycine-Nitrate Combustion Method for Ammonia Borane Dehydrogenation Processes // Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2019. V. 44. № 44. P. 24277–24291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.137
Komova O.V., Simagina V.I., Pochtar A.A., Bulavchenko O.A., Ishchenko A.V., Odegova G.V., Gorlova A.M., Ozerova A.M., Lipatnikova I.L., Tayban E.S., Mukha S.A., Netskina O.V. Catalytic Behavior of Iron-Containing Cubic Spinel in the Hydrolysis and Hydrothermolysis of Ammonia Borane // Materials. 2021. V. 14. № 18. P. 5422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185422
Yadav R.S., Kuřitka I., Vilcakova J., Havlica J., Masilko J., Kalina L., Tkacz J., Hajdúchová M., Enev V. Structural, Dielectric, Electrical and Magnetic Properties of CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles Synthesized by Honey Mediated Sol–Gel Combustion Method and Annealing Effect // J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2017. V. 28. № 8. P. 6245–6261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-6305-4
Güner S., Esir S., Baykal A., Demir A., Bakis Y. Magneto-Optical Properties of Cu1−xZnxFe2O4 Nanoparticles // Superlattices. Microstruct. 2014. V. 74. P. 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/ J.SPMI.2014.06.021
Casbeer E., Sharma V.K., Li X.Z. Synthesis and Photocatalytic Activity of Ferrites under Visible Light: a Review // Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012. V. 87. P. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2011.11.034
Qin Q., Liu Y., Li X., Sun T., Xu Y. Enhanced Heterogeneous Fenton-Like Degradation of Methylene Blue by Reduced CuFe2O4 // RSC Adv. 2018. V. 8. P. 1071–1077. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra12488k
Feng J., Su L., Ma Y., Ren C., Guo Q., Chen X. CuFe2O4 Magnetic Nanoparticles: a Simple and Efficient Catalyst for the Reduction of Nitrophenol // Chem. Eng. J. 2013. V. 221. P. 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2013.02.009
Martins N., Martins L., Amorim C., Amaral V., Pombeiro A. Solvent-Free Microwave-Induced Oxidation of Alcohols Catalyzed by Ferrite Magnetic Nanoparticles // Catalysts. 2017. V. 7 № 7. P. 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7070222
Sutka A., Mezinskis G. Sol-Gel Auto-Combustion Synthesis of Spinel-Type Ferrite Nanomaterials // Front. Mater. Sci. 2012. V. 6. P. 128–141.
Симагина В.И., Комова О.В., Одегова Г.В., Нецкина О.В., Булавченко О.А., Почтарь А.А., Кайль Н.Л. Исследование медь-железо смешанного оксида со структурой кубической шпинели, синтезированного методом горения // Журн. прикл. химии. 2019. Т. 92. № 1. С. 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0044461819010031
Почтарь А.А., Малахов В.В. Стехиографический метод дифференцирующего растворения в исследовании химического состава функциональных материалов // Неорган. материалы. 2021. Т. 57. № 4. С. 457–464. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002337X21040126
Почтарь А.А., Малахов В.В. Новые стехиографические методы определения пространственной неоднородности состава и структуры твердых веществ и материалов // Неорган. материалы. 2018. Т. 54. № 7. С. 790–796. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0002337X18070217
Малахов В.В. Особенности динамического режима дифференцирующего растворения как метода фазового анализа // Журн. анал. химии. 2009. Т. 64. № 11. С. 1125–1135.
Малахов В.В., Болдырева Н.Н., Власов А.А., Довлитова Л.С. Методология и техника стехиографического анализа твердых неорганических веществ и материалов // Журн. анал. химии. 2011. Т. 66. № 5. С. 473–479.
Вертушков Г.Н., Авдонин В.Н. Таблицы для определения минералов по физическим и химическим свойствам. М.: Недра, 1980. С. 294.