Response of Sandy and Clayey Soils to Weak And Strong Seismic Loading

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The response of sandy and clayey near-surface soils representing the classes of noncohesive and cohesive soils to seismic loading of various intensities is analyzed from the in situ data —from the records by vertical groups of the Japanese nationwide KiK-net strong motion seismograph network. For the analysis, out of a total of ~800 stations, we selected five stations with near-surface sandy soils and five stations with near-surface clayey soils, most purely represented in the upper layers. Using the method (Pavlenko and Irikura, 2003), we have constructed and analyzed the models of strong ground motion behavior for “sandy” and “clayey” stations, showing the distributions of earthquake-induced stresses and strains in the soil layers. Close estimates of the amplification of seismic waves in sands and clays at weak seismic ground motion and close stress-strain relationships characterizing the behavior of the near-surface soils at moderate seismic ground motion are obtained. The liquefaction of sandy soils under strong shaking (the 2011 Tohoku earthquake with Мw ~ 9.0) is analyzed. The effects of the extended seismic sources (directivity of their radiation pattern) on the behavior of sandy and clayey soils and the amplification of seismic waves in these soils is studied. Differences in the behavior of sandy and clayey soils are noted only at strong seismic motions: liquefaction in sandy soils is possible if the groundwater level is on the order of a few meters from the surface, while in clayey soils there is no liquefaction.

About the authors

E. V. Deshcherevskaya

Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: deelvl@gmail.com
Russia, 123242, Moscow

O. V. Pavlenko

Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: olga@ifz.ru
Russia, 123242, Moscow

References

  1. Инженерная геология России. Т. 1. Грунты России / Трофимов В.Т., Вознесенский Е.А., Королев В.А. (ред.). М.: КДУ. 2011. 672 с.
  2. Мишель А.Г., Шульман С.Г. Динамика многофазных грунтовых сред. С.-Пб.: ОАО ВНИИГ им. Веденеева. 1999. 396 с.
  3. Павленко О.В. Сейсмические волны в грунтовых слоях: нелинейное поведение грунта при сильных землетрясениях последних лет. М.:Научный мир.2009. 284 с.
  4. Aguirre J., Irikura K. Nonlinearity, Liquefaction, and Velocity variation of Soft Soil Layers in PI, Kobe, during the Hyogo-ken Nanbu Earthquake // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1997. V. 87. P. 1244–1258.
  5. Anderson J.G. Strong-Motion Seismology. International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology. Part B. 2003. P. 937–965.
  6. Bard P.-Y. Effects of surface geology on ground motion: Recent results and remaining issues. Proceedings of the 10th ECEE. Duma. Rotterdam: Balkema. 1995. P. 305–324.
  7. Beresnev I.A., Wen K.-L., Yeh Y.T. Nonlinear soil amplification: Its corroboration in Taiwan // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1995. V. 85. P. 496–515.
  8. Borcherdt R.D. Effects of local geology on ground motion near San-Francisco Bay // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1970. V. 60. P. 29–61.
  9. Borcherdt R.D. Influence of local geology in the San Francisco Bay region, California, on ground motion generated by the Loma Prieta earthquake of October 17, 1989 .Proceedings of the Int’l Symposium on Safety and Urban Life and Facilities, Tokyo Inst. Tech. Tokyo. Japan. 1990.
  10. Borcherdt R.D., Wentworth C.M. Strong ground motion generated by the Northridge earthquake of January 17. 1994: implications for seismic design coefficients and seismic zonation. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference On Seismic Zonation. Oct. 17–19 1995. Nice, France. P. 964–972.
  11. Caillot V., Bard P.-Y. Characterizing site effects for earthquake regulations in the French seismicity context: A statistical analysis. Proceedings of the 9th European conference on Earthquake Engineering. Moscow. 1990. P. 27–36.
  12. Chang C.-Y., Mok C.M., Power M.S., Tang Y.K., Tang H.T., Stepp J.C. Development of shear modulus reduction curves based on Lotung downhole ground motion data. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. 1991. P. 111–118.
  13. Darragh R.B., Shakal A.F. The site response of two rock and soil station pairs to strong and weak ground motion // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1991. V. 81. P. 1885–1899.
  14. Hardin B.O., Drnevich V.P. Shear modulus and damping in soils: Measurement and parameter effects. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers // J. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division. 1972. V. 98. P. 603–624.
  15. Hardin B.O., Drnevich V.P. Shear modulus and damping in soils: Design equations and curves. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers // J. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division. 1972. V. 98. P. 667–692.
  16. Ishihara K. Post-earthquake failure of a tailings dam due to liquefaction of the pond deposit. Proceedings of the International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. Univ. of Missouri. St. Louis. 1984. V. 3. P. 1129–1143.
  17. Ishihara K. Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes. Proceedings of the11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 1985. V. 1. P. 321–376.
  18. Ishihara K. Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes // Geotechnique.1993. V. 43. № 3. P. 351–415.
  19. Joyner W.B., Chen T.F. Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1975. V. 65. № 5. P. 1315–1336.
  20. Kawase H. Site Effects on Strong Ground Motions. International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology. Part B. 2003. P. 1013–1030.
  21. Kobayashi H., Midorikawa S. Study of site effects in Mexico City using microtremors // Proceedings of Japanese Symposium on earthquake Engineering. 1986. V. 7. P. 355–360.
  22. Kokusho T., Sato K. Surface-to-base amplification evaluated from KiK-net vertical array strong motion records // Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2008. V. 28. P. 707–716.
  23. Kramer S.L. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 1996. 653 p.
  24. Pavlenko O.V., Irikura K.Estimation of nonlinear time-dependent soil behavior in strong ground motion based on vertical array data // Pure and Applied Geophysics. 2003. V. 160. P. 2365–2379.
  25. Pavlenko O.V. Possible Mechanisms for Generation of Anomalously High PGA During the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake // Pure and Applied Geophysics. 2017. V. 174. № 8. P. 2909–2924.
  26. Rogers A.M., Borcherdt R.D., Covington P.A., Perkins D.M. A comparative ground response study near Los Angeles using recordings of Nevada nuclear tests and the 1971 San Fernando earthquake // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.1984. V. 74. P. 1925–1949.
  27. Rogers A.M., Tinsley J.C., Borcherdt R.D. Predicting relative ground response, in Evaluating earthquake hazards in the Los Angeles region-an earth-science perspective. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1360. 1985. P. 221–247.
  28. Silva W.J. Global characteristics and site geometry. Chapter 6. Proceedings: NSF/EPRI Workshop on Dynamic Soil Properties and Site Characterization. Palo Alto. Calif. Electric Power Research Institute. 1991. P. 7337.
  29. Singh S.K., Mena E., Castro R. Some aspects of source characteristics of the 19 September 1985 Michoacan earthquake and ground motion amplification in and near Mexico City from strong motion // Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1988. V. 78. P. 451–477.
  30. Tucker B.E., King J.L. Dependence of sediment-filled valley response on the input amplitude and the valley properties //Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1984. V. 74. P. 153–165.
  31. Youd T.L. Mapping of earthquake-induced liquefaction for seismic zonation. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Seismic Zonation. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. Stanford University. 1991. V. I. P. 111–147.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2.

Download (275KB)
3.

Download (176KB)
4.

Download (611KB)
5.

Download (730KB)
6.

Download (301KB)
7.

Download (266KB)
8.

Download (1MB)
9.

Download (1MB)
10.

Download (342KB)
11.

Download (317KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies