Рекомендации по составлению отчетов о диагностических исследованиях (STARD 2015): разъяснения и уточнения
- Авторы: Cohen J.F.1,2, Korevaar D.A.1, Altman D.G.3, Bruns D.E.4, Gatsonis C.A.5, Hooft L.6, Irwig L.7, Levine D.B.8,9, de Vet H.C.10, Bossuyt P.M.1
-
Учреждения:
- University of Amsterdam
- Paris Descartes University
- University of Oxford
- University of Virginia School of Medicine
- Brown University School of Public Health
- University of Utrecht
- University of Sydney
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- Radiology Editorial Office
- VU University Medical Center
- Выпуск: Том 2, № 3 (2021)
- Страницы: 313-342
- Раздел: Обзоры
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/DD/article/view/71031
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/DD71031
- ID: 71031
Цитировать
Полный текст
Аннотация
Диагностические исследования (diagnostic accuracy studies), как и другие клинические исследования, подвержены риску систематических ошибок (bias) из-за недостатков дизайна и проведения, а их результаты могут оказаться неприменимыми к другим группам пациентов и в других условиях. Читатели должны быть достаточно подробно проинформированы о дизайне и проведении диагностического исследования, чтобы судить о надежности (trustworthiness) и применимости (applicability) его результатов. Руководство STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) разработано с целью обеспечить полноту и прозрачность отчетов о диагностических исследованиях. Оно содержит перечень основных пунктов отчета, который может быть использован авторами, рецензентами и читателями как контрольный список (checklist) для отслеживания полноты представляемой информации. Здесь представлено обновленное руководство STARD, все материалы которого, включая контрольный список, доступны на http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/stard. В данной статье приведены обоснования для 30 пунктов руководства и описание того, что требуется от авторов для составления достаточно информативных отчетов об исследованиях.
Настоящая статья является русскоязычным переводом оригинальной публикации [Cohen J.F., Korevaar D.A., Altman D.G. et al. STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open 2016;6:e012799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799 ] под редакцией д.м.н. Р.Т. Сайгитова.
Полный текст
Открыть статью на сайте журналаОб авторах
Jérémie F. Cohen
University of Amsterdam; Paris Descartes University
Email: p.m.bossuyt@amc.uva.nl
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3572-8985
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Department of Pediatrics
Нидерланды, Амстердам; ПарижDaniël A. Korevaar
University of Amsterdam
Email: p.m.bossuyt@amc.uva.nl
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7979-7897
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre
Нидерланды, АмстердамDouglas G. Altman
University of Oxford
Email: p.m.bossuyt@amc.uva.nl
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7183-4083
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Centre for Statistics in Medicine
Великобритания, ОксфордDavid E. Bruns
University of Virginia School of Medicine
Email: p.m.bossuyt@amc.uva.nl
Department of Pathology, University of Virginia School of Medicine
США, Шарлотсвилл, ВирджинияConstantine A. Gatsonis
Brown University School of Public Health
Email: p.m.bossuyt@amc.uva.nl
Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health
США, Провиденс, Род-АйлендLotty Hooft
University of Utrecht
Email: p.m.bossuyt@amc.uva.nl
Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care
Нидерланды, УтрехтLes Irwig
University of Sydney
Email: p.m.bossuyt@amc.uva.nl
Screening and Diagnostic Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health
Австралия, Сидней, Новый Южный УэльсDeborah B. Levine
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Radiology Editorial Office
Email: p.m.bossuyt@amc.uva.nl
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7761-6493
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Radiology Editorial Office
США, Бостон, МассачусетсHenrica C. W. de Vet
VU University Medical Center
Email: p.m.bossuyt@amc.uva.nl
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5454-2804
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center
Нидерланды, АмстердамPatrick M.M. Bossuyt
University of Amsterdam
Автор, ответственный за переписку.
Email: p.m.bossuyt@amc.uva.nl
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4427-0128
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre
Нидерланды, АмстердамСписок литературы
- Whiting P.F., Rutjes A.W., Reitsma J.B., et al. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review//Ann Intern Med. 2004. Vol. 140, N 3. Р. 189–202. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00010
- Whiting P.F., Rutjes A.W., Westwood M.E., et al. A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies//J Clin Epidemiol. 2013. Vol. 66, N 10. Р. 1093–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.05.014
- Whiting P.F., Rutjes A.W., Westwood M.E., et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies//Ann Intern Med. 2011. Vol. 155, N 8. Р. 529–536. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
- Korevaar D.A., van Enst W.A., Spijker R., et al. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD//Evid Based Med. 2014. Vol. 19, N 2. Р. 47–54. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101637
- Korevaar D.A., Wang J., van Enst W.A., et al. Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD//Radiology. 2015. Vol. 274, N 3. Р. 781–789. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141160
- Lijmer J.G., Mol B.W., Heisterkamp S., et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests//JAMA. 1999. Vol. 282, N 11. Р. 1061–1066. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.11.1061
- Bossuyt P.M., Reitsma J.B., Bruns D.E., et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative//Clin Chem. 2003. Vol. 49, N 1. Р. 1–6. doi: 10.1373/49.1.1
- Begg C., Cho M., Eastwood S., et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement//JAMA. 1996. Vol. 276, N 8. Р. 637–639. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.8.637
- Schulz K.F., Altman D.G., Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials//BMJ. 2010. Vol. 340, N 1. Р. 332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332
- Bossuyt P.M., Reitsma J.B., Bruns D.E., et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies//BMJ. 2015. Vol. 351. Р. h5527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527
- Bossuyt P.M., Reitsma J.B., Bruns D.E., et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration//Ann Intern Med. 2003. Vol. 138, N 1. Р. W1–12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1
- Regge D., Laudi C., Galatola G., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer//JAMA. 2009. Vol. 301, N 23. Р. 2453–2461. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.832
- Deville W.L., Bezemer P.D., Bouter L.M. Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals: an optimal search strategy//J Clin Epidemiol. 2000. Vol. 53, N 1. Р. 65–69. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00144-4
- Korevaar D.A., Cohen J.F., Hooft L., et al. Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies//J Clin Epidemiol. 2015. Vol. 68, N 6. Р. 708–715. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.014
- Korevaar D.A., Cohen J.F., de Ronde M.W., et al. Reporting weaknessess in conference abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies in ophthalmology//JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015. Vol. 133, N 12. Р. 1464–1467. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.3577
- A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature//Ann Intern Med. 1987. Vol. 106, N 4. Р. 598–604.
- Stiell I.G., Greenberg G.H., Wells G.A., et al. Derivation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries//Ann Emerg Med. 1995. Vol. 26, N 4. Р. 405–413. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70106-0
- Horvath A.R., Lord S.J., StJohn A., et al. From biomarkers to medical tests: the changing landscape of test evaluation//Clin Chim Acta. 2014. Vol. 427. Р. 49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.018
- Bossuyt P.M., Irwig L., Craig J., et al. Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways//BMJ. 2006. Vol. 332. Р. 1089–1092. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1089
- Gieseker K.E., Roe M.H., MacKenzie T., et al. Evaluating the American Academy of Pediatrics diagnostic standard for Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis: backup culture versus repeat rapid antigen testing//Pediatrics. 2003. Vol. 111, N 6 Pt 1. Р. e666–670. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.6.e666
- Tanz R.R., Gerber M.A., Kabat W., et al. Performance of a rapid antigen-detection test and throat culture in community pediatric offices: implications for management of pharyngitis//Pediatrics. 2009. Vol. 123, N 2. Р. 437–444. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0488
- Ochodo E.A., de Haan M.C., Reitsma J.B., et al. Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of ‘spin’//Radiology. 2013. Vol. 267, N 2. Р. 581–588. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120527
- Freer P.E., Niell B., Rafferty E.A. Preoperative tomosynthesis-guided needle localization of mammographically and sonographically occult breast lesions//Radiology. 2015. Vol. 275, N 2. Р. 377–383. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140515
- Sorensen H.T., Sabroe S., Olsen J. A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research//Int J Epidemiol. 1996. Vol. 25, N 2. Р. 435–442. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.2.435
- Geersing G.J., Erkens P.M., Lucassen W.A., et al. Safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism using the Wells rule and qualitative D-dimer testing in primary care: prospective cohort study//BMJ. 2012. Vol. 345. Р. e6564. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6564
- Bomers M.K., van Agtmael M.A., Luik H., et al. Using a dog’s superior olfactory sensitivity to identify Clostridium difficile in stools and patients: proof of principle study//BMJ. 2012. Vol. 345. Р. e7396. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7396
- Philbrick J.T., Horwitz R.I., Feinstein A.R. Methodologic problems of exercise testing for coronary artery disease: groups, analysis and bias//Am J Cardiol. 1980. Vol. 46, N 5. Р. 807–812. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90432-4
- Rutjes A.W., Reitsma J.B., Vandenbroucke J.P., et al. Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies//Clin Chem. 2005. Vol. 51, N 8. Р. 1335–1341. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.048595
- Rutjes A.W., Reitsma J.B., Di Nisio M., et al. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies//CMAJ. 2006. Vol. 174, N 4. Р. 469–476. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050090
- Knottnerus J.A., Muris J.W. Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study//J Clin Epidemiol. 2003. Vol. 56, N 11. Р. 1118–1128. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00206-3
- Van der Schouw Y.T., Van Dijk R., Verbeek A.L. Problems in selecting the adequate patient population from existing data files for assessment studies of new diagnostic tests//J Clin Epidemiol.1995. Vol. 48, N 3. Р. 417–422. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00144-f
- Leeflang M.M., Bossuyt P.M., Irwig L. Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis//J Clin Epidemiol. 2009. Vol. 62, N 1. Р. 5–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.007
- Attia M., Zaoutis T., Eppes S., et al. Multivariate predictive models for group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis in children//Acad Emerg Med. 1999. Vol. 6, N 1. Р. 8–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00087.x
- Knottnerus J.A., Knipschild P.G., Sturmans F. Symptoms and selection bias: the influence of selection towards specialist care on the relationship between symptoms and diagnoses//Theor Med. 1989. Vol. 10, N 1. Р. 67–81. doi: 10.1007/BF00625761
- Knottnerus J.A., Leffers P. The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic tests//J Clin Epidemiol. 1992. Vol. 45, N 10. Р. 1143–1154. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90155-g
- Melbye H., Straume B. The spectrum of patients strongly influences the usefulness of diagnostic tests for pneumonia//Scand J Prim Health Care. 1993. Vol. 11, N 4. Р. 241–246. doi: 10.3109/02813439308994838
- Ezike E.N., Rongkavilit C., Fairfax M.R., et al. Effect of using 2 throat swabs vs 1 throat swab on detection of group A streptococcus by a rapid antigen detection test//Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005. Vol. 159, N 5. Р. 486–490. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.5.486
- Rosjo H., Kravdal G., Hoiseth A.D., et al. Troponin I measured by a high-sensitivity assay in patients with suspected reversible myocardial ischemia: data from the Akershus Cardiac Examination (ACE) 1 study//Clin Chem. 2012. Vol. 58, N 11. Р. 1565–1573. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.190868
- Irwig L., Bossuyt P., Glasziou P., et al. Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable//BMJ. 2002. Vol. 324, N 7338. Р. 669–671. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.669
- Detrano R., Gianrossi R., Froelicher V. The diagnostic accuracy of the exercise electrocardiogram: a meta-analysis of 22 years of research//Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1989. Vol. 32, N 3. Р. 173–206. doi: 10.1016/0033-0620(89)90025-x
- Brealey S., Scally A.J. Bias in plain film reading performance studies//Br J Radiol. 2001. Vol. 74, N 880. Р. 307–316. doi: 10.1259/bjr.74.880.740307
- Elmore J.G., Wells C.K., Lee C.H., et al. Variability in radiologists’ interpretations of mammograms//N Engl J Med. 1994. Vol. 331, N 22. Р. 1493–1499. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199412013312206
- Ronco G., Montanari G., Aimone V., et al. Estimating the sensitivity of cervical cytology: errors of interpretation and test limitations//Cytopathology. 1996. Vol. 7, N 3. Р. 151–158. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1996.39382393.x
- Cohen M.B., Rodgers R.P., Hales M.S., et al. Influence of training and experience in fine-needle aspiration biopsy of breast. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis//Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1987. Vol. 111, N 6. Р. 518–520.
- Fox J.W., Cohen D.M., Marcon M.J., et al. Performance of rapid streptococcal antigen testing varies by personnel//J Clin Microbiol. 2006. Vol. 44, N 11. Р. 3918–3922. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01399-06
- Gandy M., Sharpe L., Perry K.N., et al. Assessing the efficacy of 2 screening measures for depression in people with epilepsy//Neurology. 2012. Vol. 79, N 4. Р. 371–375. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318260cbfc
- Stegeman I., de Wijkerslooth T.R., Stoop E.M., et al. Combining risk factors with faecal immunochemical test outcome for selecting CRC screenees for colonoscopy//Gut. 2014. Vol. 63, N 3. Р. 466–471. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305013
- Leeflang M.M., Moons K.G., Reitsma J.B., et al. Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions//Clin Chem. 2008. Vol. 54, N 4. Р. 729–737. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.096032
- Ewald B. Post hoc choice of cut points introduced bias to diagnostic research//J Clin Epidemiol. 2006. Vol. 59, N 8. Р. 798–801. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.025
- Justice A.C., Covinsky K.E., Berlin J.A. Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information//Ann Intern Med. 1999. Vol. 130, N 6. Р. 515–524. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00016
- Harrell F.E., Lee K.L., Mark D.B. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors//Stat Med. 1996. Vol. 15, N 4. Р. 361–387. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO.;2-4
- Hodgdon T., McInnes M.D., Schieda N., et al. Can quantitative CT texture analysis be used to differentiate fat-poor renal angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma on unenhanced CT images?//Radiology. 2015. Vol. 276, N 3. Р. 787–796. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142215
- Begg C.B. Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests//Stat Med. 1987. Vol. 6, N 4. Р. 411–423. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060402
- Doubilet P., Herman P.G. Interpretation of radiographs: effect of clinical history//AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981. Vol. 137, N 5. Р. 1055–1058. doi: 10.2214/ajr.137.5.1055
- D’Orsi C.J., Getty D.J., Pickett R.M., et al. Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial//Radiology. 2013. Vol. 266, N 1. Р. 81–88. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120382
- Knottnerus J.A., Buntinx F. The evidence base of clinical diagnosis: theory and methods of diagnostic research. 2nd edn. BMJ Books, 2008. 316 р.
- Pepe M. Study design and hypothesis testing. The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2003. Р. 214–251.
- Hayen A., Macaskill P., Irwig L., et al. Appropriate statistical methods are required to assess diagnostic tests for replacement, add-on, and triage//J Clin Epidemiol. 2010. Vol. 63, N 8. Р. 883–891. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.024
- Реnа B.M., Mandl K.D., Kraus S.J., et al. Ultrasonography and limited computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children//JAMA. 1999. Vol. 282, N 11. Р. 1041–1046. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.11.1041
- Simel D.L., Feussner J.R., DeLong E.R., et al. Intermediate, indeterminate, and uninterpretable diagnostic test results//Med Decis Making. 1987. Vol. 7, N 2. Р. 107–114. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8700700208
- Philbrick J.T., Horwitz R.I., Feinstein A.R., et al. The limited spectrum of patients studied in exercise test research. Analyzing the tip of the iceberg//JAMA. 1982. Vol. 248, N 19. Р. 2467–2470.
- Begg C.B., Greenes R.A., Iglewicz B. The influence of uninterpretability on the assessment of diagnostic tests//J Chronic Dis. 1986. Vol. 39, N 8. Р. 575–584. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90182-7
- Shinkins B., Thompson M., Mallett S., et al. Diagnostic accuracy studies: how to report and analyse inconclusive test results//BMJ. 2013. Vol. 346. Р. f2778. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2778
- Pisano E.D., Fajardo L.L., Tsimikas J., et al. Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. The RDOG5 investigators//Cancer. 1998. Vol. 82, N 4. Р. 679–688. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980215)82:4<679::aid-cncr10>3.0.co;2-v
- Giard R.W., Hermans J. The value of aspiration cytologic examination of the breast. A statistical review of the medical literature//Cancer. 1992. Vol. 69, N 8. Р. 2104–2110. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920415)69:8<2104::aid-cncr2820690816>3.0.co;2-o
- Investigators P. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED)//JAMA. 1990. Vol. 263, N 20. Р. 2753–2759. doi: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440200057023
- Min J.K., Leipsic J., Pencina M.J., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography//JAMA. 2012. Vol. 308, N 12. Р. 1237–1245. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11274
- Naaktgeboren C.A., de Groot J.A., Rutjes A.W., et al. Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies//BMJ. 2016. Vol. 352. Р. i402. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i402
- Van der Heijden G.J., Donders A.R., Stijnen T., et al. Imputation of missing values is superior to complete case analysis and the missing-indicator method in multivariable diagnostic research: a clinical example//J Clin Epidemiol. 2006. Vol. 59, N 10. Р. 1102–1109. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.015
- de Groot J.A., Bossuyt P.M., Reitsma J.B., et al. Verification problems in diagnostic accuracy studies: consequences and solutions//BMJ. 2011. Vol. 343. Р. d4770. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4770
- Pons B., Lautrette A., Oziel J., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of early urinary index changes in differentiating transient from persistent acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: multicenter cohort study//Crit Care. 2013. Vol. 17, N 2. Р. R56. doi: 10.1186/cc12582
- Sun X., Ioannidis J.P., Agoritsas T., et al. How to use a subgroup analysis: users’ guide to the medical literature//JAMA 2014. Vol. 311, N 4. Р. 405–411. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.285063
- Zalis M.E., Blake M.A., Cai W., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography for detection of adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults: a prospective evaluation//Ann Intern Med. 2012. Vol. 156, N 10. Р. 692–702. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00005
- Flahault A., Cadilhac M., Thomas G. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies//J Clin Epidemiol. 2005. Vol. 58, N 8. Р. 859–862. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.12.009
- Pepe M.S. The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
- Vach W., Gerke O., Hoilund-Carlsen P.F. Three principles to define the success of a diagnostic study could be identified//J Clin Epidemiol. 2012. Vol. 65, N 3. Р. 293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.004
- Bachmann L.M., Puhan M.A., ter Riet G., et al. Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey//BMJ. 2006. Vol. 332, N 4550. Р. 1127–1129. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38793.637789.2F
- Bochmann F., Johnson Z., Azuara-Blanco A. Sample size in studies on diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology: a literature survey//Br J Ophthalmol. 2007. Vol. 91, N 7. Р. 898–900. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.113290
- Collins M.G., Teo E., Cole S.R., et al. Screening for colorectal cancer and advanced colorectal neoplasia in kidney transplant recipients: cross sectional prevalence and diagnostic accuracy study of faecal immunochemical testing for haemoglobin and colonoscopy//BMJ. 2012. Vol. 345. Р. e4657. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4657
- Cecil M.P., Kosinski A.S., Jones M.T., et al. The importance of work-up (verification) bias correction in assessing the accuracy of SPECT thallium-201 testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease//J Clin Epidemiol. 1996. Vol. 49, N 7. Р. 735–742. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00014-5
- Choi B.C. Sensitivity and specificity of a single diagnostic test in the presence of work-up bias//J Clin Epidemiol. 1992. Vol. 45, N 6. Р. 581–586. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90129-b
- Diamond G.A. Off Bayes: effect of verification bias on posterior probabilities calculated using Bayes’ theorem//Med Decis Making. 1992. Vol. 12, N 1. Р. 22–31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9201200105
- Diamond G.A., Rozanski A., Forrester J.S., et al. A model for assessing the sensitivity and specificity of tests subject to selection bias. Application to exercise radionuclide ventriculography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease//J Chronic Dis. 1986. Vol. 39, N 5. Р. 343–355. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90119-0
- Greenes R.A., Begg C.B. Assessment of diagnostic technologies. Methodology for unbiased estimation from samples of selectively verified patients//Invest Radiol. 1985. Vol. 20, N 7. Р. 751–756.
- Ransohoff D.F., Feinstein A.R. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests//N Engl J Med. 1978. Vol. 299, N 17. Р. 926–930. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197810262991705
- Zhou X.H. Effect of verification bias on positive and negative predictive values//Stat Med. 1994. Vol. 13, N 17. Р. 1737–1745. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131705
- Kok L., Elias S.G., Witteman B.J., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care fecal calprotectin and immunochemical occult blood tests for diagnosis of organic bowel disease in primary care: the Cost-Effectiveness of a Decision Rule for Abdominal Complaints in Primary Care (CEDAR) study//Clin Chem. 2012. Vol. 58, N 6. Р. 989–998. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.177980
- Harris J.M. The hazards of bedside Bayes//JAMA. 1981. Vol. 246, N 22. Р. 2602–2605.
- Hlatky M.A., Pryor D.B., Harrell F.E., et al. Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography. Multivariable analysis//Am J Med. 1984. Vol. 77, N 1. Р. 64–71. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90437-6
- Lachs M.S., Nachamkin I., Edelstein P.H, et al. Spectrum bias in the evaluation of diagnostic tests: lessons from the rapid dipstick test for urinary tract infection//Ann Intern Med. 1992. Vol. 117, N 2. Р. 135–140. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-2-135
- Moons K.G., van Es G.A., Deckers J.W., et al. Limitations of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and bayes’ theorem in assessing diagnostic probabilities: a clinical example//Epidemiology. 1997. Vol. 8, N 1. Р. 12–17. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199701000-00002
- O’Connor P.W., Tansay C.M., Detsky A.S., et al. The effect of spectrum bias on the utility of magnetic resonance imaging and evoked potentials in the diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis//Neurology. 1996. Vol. 47, N 1. Р. 140–144. doi: 10.1212/wnl.47.1.140
- Deckers J.W., Rensing B.J., Tijssen J.G., et al. A comparison of methods of analysing exercise tests for diagnosis of coronary artery disease//Br Heart J. 1989. Vol. 62, N 6. Р. 438–444. doi: 10.1136/hrt.62.6.438
- Naraghi A.M., Gupta S., Jacks L.M., et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MR imaging signs of anterior knee laxity in the presence of an intact graft//Radiology. 2012. Vol. 263, N 3. Р. 802–810. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110779
- Ashdown H.F., D’Souza N., Karim D., et al. Pain over speed bumps in diagnosis of acute appendicitis: diagnostic accuracy study//BMJ. 2012. Vol. 345, N . Р. e8012. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8012
- Leeflang M.M., Rutjes A.W., Reitsma J.B., et al. Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence//CMAJ. 2013. Vol. 185, N 11. Р. E537–544. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121286
- Rajaram S., Swift A.J., Capener D., et al. Lung morphology assessment with balanced steady-state free precession MR imaging compared with CT//Radiology. 2012. Vol. 263, N 2. Р. 569–577. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110990
- Lang T.A., Secic M. Generalizing from a sample to a population: reporting estimates and confidence intervals. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians; 1997.
- Ioannidis J.P., Evans S.J., Gotzsche P.C., et al. Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement//Ann Intern Med. 2004. Vol. 141, N 10. Р. 781–788. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00009
- Ioannidis J.P., Lau J. Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas//JAMA. 2001. Vol. 285, N 4. Р. 437–443. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.4.437
- Park S.H., Lee J.H., Lee S.S., et al. CT colonography for detection and characterisation of synchronous proximal colonic lesions in patients with stenosing colorectal cancer//Gut. 2012. Vol. 61, N 12. Р. 1716–1722. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301135
- Irwig L.M., Bossuyt P.M., Glasziou P.P., et al. Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy will travel. In: Knottnerus JA, ed. The evidence base of clinical diagnosis. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2002. Р. 95–116. doi: 10.1002/9781444300574.ch6
- Ter Riet G., Chesley P., Gross A.G., et al. All that glitters isn’t gold: a survey on acknowledgment of limitations in biomedical studies//PLoS ONE. 2013. Vol. 8, N 11. Р. e73623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073623
- Ioannidis J.P. Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature//J Clin Epidemiol. 2007. Vol. 60, N 4. Р. 324–329. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.011
- Lord S.J., Irwig L., Simes R.J. When is measuring sensitivity and specificity sufficient to evaluate a diagnostic test, and when do we need randomized trials?//Ann Intern Med. 2006. Vol. 144, N 11. Р. 850–855. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-11-200606060-00011
- Pewsner D., Battaglia M., Minder C., et al. Ruling a diagnosis in or out with ‘SpPIn’ and ‘SnNOut’: a note of caution//BMJ. 2004. Vol. 329, N 7459. Р. 209–213. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7459.209
- Foerch C., Niessner M., Back T., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein for differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage and cerebral ischemia in patients with symptoms of acute stroke//Clin Chem. 2012. Vol. 58, N 1. Р. 237–245. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.172676
- Altman D.G. The time has come to register diagnostic and prognostic research//Clin Chem. 2014. Vol. 60, N 4. Р. 580–582. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.220335
- Hooft L., Bossuyt P.M. Prospective registration of marker evaluation studies: time to act//Clin Chem. 2011. Vol. 57, N 12. Р. 1684–1686. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.176230
- Rifai N., Altman D.G., Bossuyt P.M. Reporting bias in diagnostic and prognostic studies: time for action//Clin Chem. 2008. Vol. 54, N 7. Р. 1101–1103. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.108993
- Korevaar D.A., Ochodo E.A., Bossuyt P.M., et al. Publication and reporting of test accuracy studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov//Clin Chem. 2014. Vol. 60, N 4. Р. 651–659. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.218149
- Rifai N., Bossuyt P.M., Ioannidis J.P., et al. Registering diagnostic and prognostic trials of tests: is it the right thing to do?//Clin Chem. 2014. Vol. 60, N 9. Р. 1146–1152. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.226100
- Korevaar D.A., Bossuyt P.M., Hooft L. Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports//BMJ Open. 2014. Vol. 4, N 1. Р. e004596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004596
- Leeuwenburgh M.M., Wiarda B.M., Wiezer M.J., et al. Comparison of imaging strategies with conditional contrast-enhanced CT and unenhanced MR imaging in patients suspected of having appendicitis: a multicenter diagnostic performance study//Radiology. 2013. Vol. 268, N 1. Р. 135–143. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121753
- Chan A.W., Song F., Vickers A., et al. Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research//Lancet. 2014. Vol. 383, N 9913. Р. 257–266. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62296-5
- Stewart C.M., Schoeman S.A., Booth R.A., et al. Assessment of self taken swabs versus clinician taken swab cultures for diagnosing gonorrhoea in women: single centre, diagnostic accuracy study//BMJ. 2012. Vol. 345. Р. e8107. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8107
- Sismondo S. Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences: a qualitative systematic review//Contemp Clin Trials. 2008. Vol. 29, N 2. Р. 109–113. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.08.001
Дополнительные файлы
![](/img/style/loading.gif)