Erratum to “Duration matters: anticonvulsant therapy linked to bone loss in interim cross-sectional study” (Consortium PSYCHIATRICUM, 2025, Volume 6 Issue 2, doi: 10.17816/CP15553)

Natalia A. Sivakova; Сивакова Наталия Александровна; Irina V. Abramova; Абрамова Ирина Викторовна; Irina Y. Trukhina; Трухина Ирина Юрьевна; Varvara P. Rybasova; Рыбасова Варвара Павловна; Mikhail Y. Sorokin; Сорокин Михаил Юрьевич; Evgeny D. Kasyanov; Касьянов Евгений Дмитриевич; Larisa V. Lukina; Лукина Лариса Викторовна; Vladimir A. Mikhailov; Михайлов Владимир Алексеевич; Galina E. Mazo; Мазо Галина Элевна

doi:10.17816/CP15766

Erratum to “Duration matters: anticonvulsant therapy linked to bone loss in interim cross-sectional study” (Consortium PSYCHIATRICUM, 2025, Volume 6 Issue 2, doi: 10.17816/CP15553)

作者: Sivakova N.A.¹, Abramova I.V.¹, Trukhina I.Y.¹, Rybasova V.P.¹, Sorokin M.Y.¹, Kasyanov E.D.¹, Lukina L.V.¹, Mikhailov V.A.¹, Mazo G.E.¹
隶属关系:
1. V.M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Neurology
期: 卷 6, 编号 4 (2025)
页面: 97-98
栏目: ERRATUM
URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2712-7672/article/view/368186
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/CP15766
ID: 368186

如何引用文章

全文:

详细
作者简介
参考
补充文件
统计

详细

In the article “Duration Matters: Anticonvulsant Therapy Linked to Bone Loss in Interim Cross-Sectional Study” by Natalia Sivakova et al., published in Consortium PSYCHIATRICUM journal (Volume 6 Issue 2), errors were identified that require correction.

On page 10, in the RESULTS section, the tabular data was incorrectly presented as:

The study included 100 adult patients with epilepsy aged 21–60 years (Me=29.0; interquartile range (IQR): 25.0; 43.3) instead of (Me=36.0; interquartile range (IQR): 29.0; 43.0);
The control group included 58 somatically healthy volunteers aged 22–60 years (Me=29; IQR: 25; 43) instead of (Me=29.0; IQR: 25.0; 43.3).

The publisher has corrected the electronic version of the published article and updated it on the journal’s website (both PDF and HTML). The editorial team of the journal hopes that the mistakes could not significantly affect the perception and interpretation of the published work by readers, and should not become the reason for retraction. The editorial team and authors apologize to the readers for the mistakes made.