<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Issues of Economic Theory</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Issues of Economic Theory</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вопросы теоретической экономики</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic">2587-7666</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Институт экономики Российской академии наук</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">353792</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2025_4_7_19</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">QCGFAS</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Economic Theory</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Экономическая теория</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Work-related well-being: a concept and methodological approaches to measurement</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Благополучие, связанное с работой: концепция и методологические подходы к измерению</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3049-7789</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Soboleva</surname><given-names>Irina</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Соболева</surname><given-names>Ирина Викторовна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>Doctor of Economics, Chief Researcher, Head of the Centre of Development of Human Potential</italic></p> <p> </p> <p/> <p/></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>доктор экономических наук, главный научный сотрудник, </italic><italic>руководитель Центра развития человеческого потенциала</italic></p> <p> </p> <p/> <p/></bio><email>irasobol@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6970-487X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chernykh</surname><given-names>Ekaterina</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Черных</surname><given-names>Екатерина Алексеевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>PhD in Economics, Leading Research Worker of the Department of Employment Policy and Social and Labor Relations at the Centre of Development of Human Potential</italic> </p> <p/> <p/></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>доктор экономических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник</italic></p> <p/> <p/></bio><email>chernykh.ekaterina108@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУН Институт экономики РАН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-11-10" publication-format="electronic"><day>10</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>7</fpage><lpage>19</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-11-26"><day>26</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-11-26"><day>26</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2026, Soboleva I., Chernykh E.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2026, Соболева И.В., Черных Е.А.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Soboleva I., Chernykh E.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Соболева И.В., Черных Е.А.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rcsi.science/2587-7666/article/view/353792">https://journals.rcsi.science/2587-7666/article/view/353792</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article provides a critical analysis of approaches to investigating personal situation in the sphere of labor. It is shown that in the context of today when the employer-employee relations become increasingly more sophisticated and flexible traditional job quality indicators focusing mainly on compliance with established standards in the field of income and framework conditions of employment do not sufficiently reflect the multifaceted realities of the new labor market realities. Hence, there is a growing demand for rethinking the methodology of its assessment. The strong sides and weaknesses of approaches from the standpoint of the objectivistic quality of employment concept and the subjective well-being concept are identified, and a conclusion is made about the need for an integrative approach that takes into account both the objective parameters of employment and their compliance with individual preferences and needs of employees. Theoretical models developed in line with this approach are considered, such as the<bold> «Job Demands-Resources</bold>» model, the «Vitamins» model, as well as the approach from the point of view of the opportunities open to an individual in the sphere of employment, based on the concept of functional capabilities of A. Sen. Pushing off generalization of the models discussed, the expediency of assessing individual situation in the sphere of labor based on the concept of work-related well-being is substantiated. It is shown that this concept incorporates both the objective parameters of working life quality and the instrumental usefulness of employment, as well as self-assessment by employees of their situation in the sphere of labor. Moreover, it allows assessing the compliance of individual characteristics of employees and the job requirements. The importance of integrating into the methodological apparatus elements of the adaptive rationalization concept, according to which the holders of objectively unfavorable jobs may perceive their employment as acceptable, which distorts the real picture of their well-being is emphasized. Finally, we elaborate methodology for constructing work-related well-being profiles, which is based upon aspect-by-aspect comparison of its objective and subjective micro-level indicators. It is shown that the application of our methodology allows obtaining a comprehensive picture of the situation of the working population in the Russian economy, identifying vulnerable groups of workers, and substantiating priority areas for state intervention and employers' initiatives aimed at promoting an integrated human-oriented approach in the sphere of labor.</p> <p/></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Показано, что сегодня в условиях усложнения социально-трудовых отношений традиционные индикаторы, фокусирующиеся на соответствии параметров рабочих мест установленным стандартам в области доходов и рамочных условий занятости, в недостаточной степени отражают многоплановые реалии этого положения и возникает запрос на переосмысление методологии его оценки. Выявлены сильные и слабые стороны подходов с позиций концепций качества занятости и субъективного благополучия, сделан вывод о необходимости интегративного подхода, учитывающего как объективные параметры занятости, так и их соответствие индивидуальным предпочтениям и потребностям работников. Рассмотрены теоретические модели, разработанные в русле интегративного подхода, такие как модель «требования – ресурсы», модель «витаминов», а также подход с точки зрения возможностей, открытых для индивида в сфере занятости, опирающийся на концепцию функциональных возможностей А. Сена. На основе обобщения этих моделей обоснована целесообразность оценки положения человека в сфере труда с опорой на концепцию благополучия, связанного с работой. Показано, что эта концепция вбирает в себя как объективные параметры качества трудовой жизни и инструментальной полезности занятости, так и самооценку работниками своей ситуации в сфере труда и позволяет оценить соответствие индивидуальных характеристик работников и требований рабочих мест. Акцентируется важность встраивания в методологический аппарат элементов концепции адаптивной рационализации, согласно которой обладатели объективно неблагоприятных рабочих мест могут воспринимать свою занятость как приемлемую, что искажает реальную картину их благополучия. Предлагается методология построения профилей благополучия, связанного с работой, основанная на поаспектном сопоставлении его объективных и субъективных микроуровневых индикаторов. Показано, что её применение позволит получить достаточно полное представление о положении трудящегося населения в отечественной экономике, определить уязвимые группы работников, и обосновать приоритетные направления государственной политики и инициатив работодателей, направленных на продвижение комплексного человеко-ориентированного подхода в сфере труда.</p> <p/></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>work-related well-being</kwd><kwd>quality of employment</kwd><kwd>subjective well-being</kwd><kwd>job satisfaction</kwd><kwd>integrative approach</kwd><kwd>adaptive rationalization</kwd><kwd>well-being indicators</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>благополучие связанное с работой</kwd><kwd>качество занятости</kwd><kwd>субъективное благополучие</kwd><kwd>удовлетворённость работой</kwd><kwd>интегративный подход</kwd><kwd>адаптивная рационализация</kwd><kwd>индикаторы благополучия</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta><fn-group><fn xml:lang="en"><p> </p> <p/></fn><fn xml:lang="ru"><p> </p> <p/></fn></fn-group></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Andreeva E.L., Polkova T.V. (2014). Assessment of the quality of working life of the population of Russian regions. DOI: 10.17059/2013-3-7. EDN RBXOXV.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Андреева Е.Л., Полкова Т.В. (2014). Оценка качества трудовой жизни населения регионов России // Экономика региона. № 3(35). C. 91-101. DOI: 10.17059/2013-3-7. EDN RBXOXV.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Breev B.D. (2005). On the quality of employment of the population of Russia. EDN OXGLRN.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бреев Б.Д. (2005). О качестве занятости населения России // Общество и экономика. № 7/8. С. 305–325. EDN OXGLRN.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zholudeva V.V., Melnichenko N.F. (2018). Statistical assessment of the quality of working life of workers in the Russian Federation. DOI: 10.21686/2500-3925-2018-4-42-51. EDN UYMXYG.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жолудева В.В., Мельниченко Н.Ф. (2018). Статистическая оценка качества трудовой жизни работников в Российской Федерации // Статистика и экономика. Т. 15. № 4. С. 42-51. DOI: 10.21686/2500-3925-2018-4-42-51. EDN UYMXYG.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zonova O.V. (2010). Quality of Working Life: Definition and Assessment Criteria. EDN NBLGLR.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зонова О.В. (2010). Качество трудовой жизни: определение и критерии оценки // Проблемы современной экономики. № 3(35). С. 79–81. EDN NBLGLR.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kolosova R.P., Baimurzina G.R. (2021). Decent work in the new conditions: updating the indicators of the quality of employment. EDN FKNNPC.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Колосова Р.П., Баймурзина Г.Р. (2021). Достойный труд в новых условиях: актуализация индикаторов качества занятости / Трансформация рынка труда и политика занятости населения: Сб. м-лов IV Междунар. научно-практ. конф. «Костинские чтения», Москва, 11.02.2021 М.: Академия труда и социальных отношений. С. 15-20. EDN FKNNPC.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lapin N.I. (2021). The Complexity of the Formation of a New Russia. An Anthroposociocultural Approach.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лапин Н.И. (2021). Сложность становления новой России. Антропосоциокультурный подход. – М.: Весь Мир.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">MOT. (2008). Measuring Decent Work Based on the Recommendations of the Tripartite Meeting of Experts on Measuring Decent Work (September 2008). URL: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---integration/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_192844.pdf (access date: 12.07.2025).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">МОТ (2008). Измерение достойного труда на основе рекомендаций Трёхстороннего совещания экспертов по измерению достойного труда (Сентябрь 2008 г.). URL: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---integration/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_192844.pdf (дата обращения: 12.07.2025).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Precarious employment in the Russian Federation: theory and methodology of identification, assessment and vector of reduction (2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Неустойчивая занятость в Российской Федерации: теория и методология выявления, оценивание и вектор сокращения. (2018) / Ред. В.Н. Бобков. – М.: КНОРУС. 342 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sadovaya E.S. (2022). The Labor Market in the Digital Economy - Prospects for Regulation. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-10-102-111.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Садовая Е.С. (2022). Рынок труда в цифровой экономике - перспективы регулирования // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. Т. 66. № 10. С. 102-111. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-10-102-111.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Soboleva I.V. (2020). Economic situation and subjective assessments of the quality of employment. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI.2020.53.439.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Соболева И.В. (2020). Экономическая конъюнктура и субъективные оценки качества занятости // Бизнес. Образование. Право. № 4 (53). С. 28–32. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI.2020.53.439.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Soboleva I.V. (2023). Challenges to socio-economic security in the sphere of labor and their features in modern Russia. DOI: 10.18334/ecsec.6.2.117846.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Соболева И.В. (2023). Вызовы социально-экономической безопасности в сфере труда и их особенности в современной России // Экономическая безопасность. Т. 6. № 2. С. 509-528. DOI: 10.18334/ecsec.6.2.117846.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Soboleva I.V. (2024). Quality of employment and work-related well-being: approaches to measurement. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2024_3_7_25. EDN ADMPER.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Соболева И.В. (2024). Качество занятости и благополучие, связанное с работой: подходы к измерению // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. № 3. С. 7-25. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2024_3_7_25. EDN ADMPER.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Toshchenko Zh. T. (2020). Trauma society: between evolution and revolution (an experience of theoretical and empirical analysis).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тощенко Ж.Т. (2020). Общество травмы: между эволюцией и революцией (опыт теоретического и эмпирического анализа). – М.: Весь Мир.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fokin V.Ya. (2013). The Impact of Territorial Differentiation of Quality and Security of Employment of the Population on the Compression of Rural Space in Perm Krai.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фокин В.Я. (2013). Влияние территориальной дифференциации качества и защищенности занятости населения на сжатие пространства сельских территорий Пермского края // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. № 6(30). С. 153–166.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chernykh E.A. (2022). Quality оf Working Life аnd Job Satisfaction on the Russian Labour Market. DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.2.6. EDN PJNIBY.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Черных Е.А. (2022). Качество трудовой жизни и удовлетворённость занятостью на российском рынке труда // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. Т. 18. № 2. С. 214–226. DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.2.6. EDN PJNIBY.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chernykh E.A. (2025). Bibliometric analysis of job satisfaction factors. DOI: 10.34022/2658-3712-2025-59-2-168-181</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Черных Е.А. (2025). Библиометрический анализ факторов удовлетворенности работой // Социально-трудовые исследования. Т. 59(2). С.168-181. DOI: 10.34022/2658-3712-2025-59-2-168-181</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Bakker A.B., Hakanen J.J., Demerouti E., Xanthopoulou D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high // Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 99. Pp. 274–284.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Belardi S., Knox A., Wright C.F. (2020). Too hot to handle? An analysis of chefs’ job quality in Australian restaurants // Journal of Industrial Relations. Vol. 63. No. 1, Pp. 3-26. DOI:10.1177/0022185620940375.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Borkowska A., Czerw A. (2022). The Vitamin Model of well-being at work - an application in research in an automotive company // International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. Vol. 35. No. 2. Pp. 187-198. DOI:10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01614.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Brand S., Fleming L., Wyatt K. (2015). Tailoring healthy workplace interventions to local healthcare settings: a complexity theory-informed workplace of well-being framework // The Scientific World Journal: 340820. DOI: 10.1155/2015/340820.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Brown A., Charlwood A., Spencer D.A (2012). Not all that it might seem: why job satisfaction is worth studying despite it being a poor summary measure of job quality // Work Employment and Society. Vol. 26. No. 6. Pp. 1007-1018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Burchell B., Sehnbruch K., Piasna A., Agloni N. (2014). The quality of employment and decent work: definitions, methodologies, and ongoing debates // Cambridge Journal of Economics. Vol. 38. Issue 2. Pp. 459-477. DOI:10.1093/cje/bet067.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Cazes S., Hijzen A., Saint-Martin A. (2015). Measuring and Assessing Job Quality: The OECD Job Quality Framework. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. OECD Publishing. Paris. No. 174. 52 p. DOI: 10.1787/5jrp02kjw1mr-en.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Chung-Yan G.A. (2010). The nonlinear effects of job complexity and autonomy on job satisfaction, turnover, and psychological well-being // Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. Vol. 15. No. 3. Pp. 237–251. DOI: 10.1037/a0019823.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Cooke G.B., Donaghey J., Zeytinoglu I.U. (2013). The nuanced nature of work quality: Evidence from rural Newfoundland and Ireland // Human Relations. Vol. 66. No. 4. Pp. 503-527.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>De Stefano V. (2016). The rise of the «just-in-time workforce»: on-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the «gig-economy» // Conditions of Work and Employment. Series No. 71 / International Labour Organization, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. (2006). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction // Journal of Happiness Studies. Vol. 9. No. 1. Pp. 1–11. DOI:10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Diener E., Suh E.M., Lucas R.E., Smith H.L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress // Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 125. No. 2. Рp. 276-302. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Diener E., Lucas R.E. (2000). Subjeсtive emotional well-being. // Handbook of emotions / Ed. by M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, L. Feldman Barrett. – New York: Guilford, Рp. 325-337.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Diener E., Lucas R.E., Scollon Ch.N. (2004). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: the multifaceted nature of happiness. // Advances in Cell Aging and Gerontology, Vol. 15. Pp. 187- 219. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Eichhorst W., Kalleberg A.L. (2023). Transformation of Modern Work, Rise of Atypical Employment, and Health. // Handbook of Life Course Occupational Health. Handbook Series in Occupational Health Sciences / M. Wahrendorf, T. Chandola, A. Descatha (eds.) – Cham: Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-94023-2_20-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Ferreira M.C., Pacheco S., Pinto N.M., Fernandes H.A., Silva A.P.C. (2007). O bem-estar no trabalho e a predição de exaustão emocional // XXXI ENANPAD.– Rio de Janeiro. Рp.1-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Findlay P., Kalleberg A.L., Warhurst C. (2013). The challenge of job quality // Human Relations. Vol. 66. No. 4. Pp. 441–451.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Ford M., Cerasoli Ch., Higgins J., Decesare A. (2011). Relationships between psychological, and behavioral health and work performance: A review and meta-analysis // Work Stress. Vol. 25. No. 3. Pp. 185–204. DOI:10.1080/02678373.2011.609035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Galanakis M.D., Tsitouri E. (2022). Positive psychology in the working environment. Job demands-resources theory, work engagement and burnout: A systematic literature review // Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 13. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1022102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Gough I., McGregor J.A. (2007). Wellbeing in developing countries / I. Gough &amp; J. A. McGregor, (eds.). — Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Green F., Mostafa T. (2012). Trends in job quality in Europe / Publications Office of the European Union, Euro-found, Luxembourg. DOI: 10.2806/35164, ISBN 978-92-897-1071-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Green F. (2021). Decent Work and The Quality of Work and Employment / GLO Discussion Paper Series 817. Global Labor Organization (GLO). Essen.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Guriev S.M.*, Vakulenko E. (2015). Breaking Out Of Poverty Traps: Internal Migration And Interregional Convergence In Russia // HSE Working papers WP BRP 88/EC/2015. National Research University Higher School of Economics.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Hamling K., Jarden A., Schofield G. (2015). Recipes for occupational wellbeing: an investigation of the associations with wellbeing in New Zealand workers // NZJ Human Resource Management. Vol. 15. No. 2. Рр. 151–73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>ILO (2013). Decent work indicators: guidelines for producers and users of statistical and legal framework indicators: ILO manual: second version. International Labour Office. Geneva. URL: https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@integration/documents/publication/wcms_229374.pdf (access date: 25.07.2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Kalleberg A.L (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: the growth of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. – New York: Russell Sage Foundation.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Kalleberg A.L, Marsden P.V (2015). Transformation of the employment relationship // Emerging trends in the social and Behavioral sciences / R. Scott, S. Kosslyn (eds.). — Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Kozyreva Р., Kosolapov М., Popkin B. (2016). Data Resource Profile: The Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey—Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE) Phase II: Monitoring the Economic and Health Situation in Russia, 1994–2013 // International Journal of Epidemiology. Vol. 45. Issue 2. Pp. 395–401. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyv357.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Lawrie E., Tuckey M., Dollard M. (2018). Job design for mindful work: the boosting effect of psychosocial safety climate // Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. Vol. 23. Pp. 483–495. DOI:10.1037/ocp0000102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Leschke J., Watt A., Finn M. (2008). Putting a number on job quality? Constructing a European job quality index / European Trade Union Institute for Research, Education and Health and Safety. – Brussels.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>McCarthy J.M., Trougakos J.P., Cheng B.H. (2016). Are anxious workers less productive workers? It depends on the quality of social exchange // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 101. No. 2. Pp. 279 –291. DOI:10.1037/apl0000044.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Meyerding G.H. (2015). Job characteristics and job satisfaction: A test of Warr’s Vitamin Model in German horticulture // The Psychologist-Manager Journal. Vol. 18. No. 2. Pp. 86–107. DOI:10.1037/mgr0000029.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Nunes P.M., Proença T., Carozzo-Todaro M.E. (2024). A systematic review on well-being and ill-being in working contexts: contributions of self-determination theory // Personnel Review. Vol. 53. No. 2. Pp. 375-419. DOI:10.1108/PR-11-2021-0812.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>OECD (2013). OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being / OECD Publishing. DOI:10.1787/9789264191655-en.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>OECD (2017). OECD Guidelines on Measuring the Quality of the Working Environment. – Paris: OECD Publishing.. DOI:10.1787/9789264278240-en.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>OECD (2024). An OECD survey of employee well-being: An instrument to measure employee well-being inside companies // OECD Papers on Well-being and Inequalities. No. 24. OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI:10.1787/74f48e24-en.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Paschoal T., Torres C.V., Porto J.B. (2010). Felicidade no trabalho: Relações com suporte organizacional e suporte social // Revista Administração Contemporânea. Vol. 14. No. 6. Pp. 1054-1072. URL: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rac/v14n6/v14n6a05.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Rethinking employment regulation: after the standard contract of employment (2013). / K.V.W. Stone, H. Arthurs (Eds). Russell Sage Foundation Press. New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Ryff C.D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 57. No. 6. Pp. 1069-1081.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Schimmack U., Radhakrishnan P., Oishi S., Dzokoto V. (2002). Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 82. No. 4. Pp. 582–593. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.582.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Sen A K. (1999). Development as Freedom. – New York: Alfred A. Knopf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Sen A.K. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. – Oxford: Clarendon Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Siqueira M.M.M., Padovam V.A.R. (2008). Bases teóricas de bem-estar subjetivo, bem estar psicológico e bem-estar no trabalho // Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa. Vol. 24. No. 2. Pp. 201–209. DOI:10.1590/S0102-37722008000200010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Steel P., Schmidt J., Shultz J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being // Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 134. No. 1. Pp.138–161. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Stephens T.C. (2025). What has Happened to Job Quality in Britain? The Effect of Different Weighting Methods on Labour Market Inequalities and Changes Using a UK Quality of Work (QoW) Index, 2012-2021 // Social Indicators Research. Vol. 177. No. 2. Pp. 833-861. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03542-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Stephens T.C. (2023). The Quality of Work (QoW): Towards a Capability Theory // Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. Vol. 24. No. 3. Pp. 309-335 DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2023.2240738</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Taylor M. (2017). Good Work: The Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices. London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>UNICE (2001). UNICE position paper on the Commission Communication «Employment and Social Policies: A Framework for Investing in Quality» // Business Europe. URL: https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/imported/2002-03849-E.pdf (access date: 25.07.2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>United Nations (2015). Handbook on measuring quality of employment: a statistical framework. Prep. by the Expert Group on Measuring Quality of Employment. NY: Economic Commission for Europe;. 320 p. URL: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/2015/ECE_CES_40.pdf (access date: 25.07.2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Veenhoven R. (2008). Freedom and happiness: comparison of 126 nations in 2006 / Paper presented at: Legatum Prosperity Workshop, June 21-22. London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Vermeylen G. (2005). Quality in work and employment in the European Working Conditions Survey // Working Paper № 4 UNECE/ILO/Eurostat Seminar on the Quality of Work, Geneva. May 11 to 13. Unece. URL: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/2005/05/labour/wp.4.e.pdf (access date: 25.07.2025).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>Warr P. (2009). Environmental «vitamins», personal judgements, work values, and happiness // The Oxford handbook of organizational well-being /S. Cartwright, S.L. Cooper, editors. – New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 57–87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Warr P. (2013). Jobs and job-holders: Two sources of happiness and unhappiness. // The Oxford handbook of happiness / I. Boniwell, S.A. David, A.C. Ayers, editors. – Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 733–750.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>Waterman A.S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 64. No. 4. Pp. 678–91. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>WEF (2025). The World Economic Forum Future of Jobs Report 2025 / Heis at the Forefront of Change January 2025. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24341.84965.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>Weziak-Bialowolska D., Bialowolski P., Sacco P.L., VanderWeele T.J., McNeely E. (2020). Well-Being in Life and Well-Being at Work: Which Comes First? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study // Frontiers in Public Health. Vol. 8. DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00103. ISSN 2296-2565.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">* Guriev S.M. — included in the list of foreign agents by the Russian Ministry of Justice.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">* Гуриев С.М. — включён Минюстом РФ в список иностранных агентов.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
