The dualistic model of independent control over information and confidentiality: Canada's experience and prospects for implementation in Russia

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the activities of Canada's two independent parliamentary institutions, the Information Commissioner and the Privacy Commissioner. The article examines their legal status and key powers that ensure a balance between transparency of state power and protection of the right to privacy. Based on the comparative legal method, an assessment of the current state of control in the information sphere in Russia is given, and systemic problems of the Russian model related to the lack of specialized independent ombudsmen and the dominance of departmental control are identified. In conclusion, the expediency is substantiated and specific proposals are formulated for adapting elements of the Canadian «dualistic model» in Russia.

Sobre autores

Svetlana Gorokhova

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: swettalana@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4919-1093
Código SPIN: 6729-3375

Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of International and Public Law of the Faculty of Law

Rússia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Melnichuk M.A. Canada's experience in legal regulation of access to information. Gaps in Russian legislation. 2014. No. 4. Pp. 23–26. (In Rus.). EDN: SMYORT.
  2. Ryabtseva E.E., Trizno T.A. The State information policy of Canada: the political and legal aspect of regulation. The Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture. 2013. № 3(36). Pp. 139–147. (In Rus.). EDN: RCDNPJ.
  3. Afanasyeva O.V. Institute of the Information Commissioner: the Canadian experience for Russia. Bulletin of the Volga Academy of Public Administration. 2009. № 4 (21). Pp. 44–51. (In Rus.). EDN: PFCKVB.
  4. Mochalov A.N. On the establishment in Russia of the post of Commissioner for the protection of human rights in the field of information and telecommunication technologies. The Rule of Law: Theory and Practice. 2022. № 2 (68). Pp. 27–39. (In Rus.). doi: 10.33184/pravgos-2022.2.3. EDN: VNUXLR.
  5. Shelepov A.V. Approaches of the BRICS countries to data regulation. Bulletin of International Organizations: Education, Science, New Economy. 2022. Vol. 17, No. 3. Pp. 212–234. (In Rus.). doi: 10.17323/1996-7845-2022-03-09. EDN: ZWCONA.
  6. Dudko I.G. Institute for the Protection of Human Rights (Ombudsman) in Canada. Bulletin of the O.E. Kutafin University (MGUA). 2021. № 4 (80). Pp. 164–176. (In Rus.). doi: 10.17803/2311-5998.2021.80.4.164-176. EDN: UKZCWW.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição–NãoComercial–SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).