与两性异形相关的下颌骨形态变化研究： 数字全景研究

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

论证。在法医人类学中，骨遗骸被广泛用于评估一个人的各种特征，这有助于确定死者的身份，或在有争议的案件中作为补充证据。

该研究的目的是使用数字全景放射线照相测量、比较和区分不同年龄组受试者下颌的性别变化，并评估其在辨明性别方面的可靠性，这可以作为法医学的一个证据要素。

材料与方法。获得了420名患者的数字全景图像，其中包括210名男性和210名女性。在研究过程中，测量和评估了诸如下颌角、髁突长度、皮质骨厚度、支长度和下颌切迹宽度等参数。使用描述性统计分析和双向方差分析进行数据处理。

结果。性别组的比较显示，除下颌切迹的宽度外，所有参数都有统计学上的显著差异（p<0.05）。男性所有参数的平均值相对较高。在研究组中，下颌支的长度和下颌角的大小在右侧较高，而下颌切迹的宽度在左侧较高。男性髁突的长度在右侧较长，女性在左侧较长。左侧男性的皮质骨厚度更大，右侧女性的皮质骨厚度更大。因此，除了下颌切迹的宽度外，所有参数在辨明性别时都是可靠的。

结论。结果发现，男性的下颌测量值高于女性，因此，因此可以推荐用于性别鉴定。

作者简介

Karthikeya Patil

JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research

Email: dr.karthikeyapatil@jssuni.edu.in
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7941-2467

MD, Professor

印度, Mysore Karnataka

N. Harshitha

JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: harshi.bnk@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8795-5365

MD

印度, Mysore Karnataka

C.J. Sanjay

JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research

Email: drsanjaycj_dch@jssuni.edu.in
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2830-1481

MD

印度, Mysore Karnataka

D. Nagabhushana

JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research

Email: dr.nagabhushand@jssuni.edu.in
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9035-0888

MD

印度, Mysore Karnataka

Devi K.R. Renuka

JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research

Email: renuraj796@gmail.com

MD

印度, Mysore Karnataka

S. Viveka

JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research

Email: sviveka96@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2232-579X

MD

印度, Mysore Karnataka

参考

  1. Konigsberg LW, Herrmann NP, Wescott DJ, Kimmerle EH. Estimation and evidence in forensic anthropology: age-at-death. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53(3):541–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00710.x
  2. Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, et al. Mandibular ramus: an indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(Suppl 1):S13–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01599.x
  3. Weisberg YJ, Deyoung CG, Hirsh JB. Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the big five. Front Psychol. 2011;2:178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178
  4. Liversidge HM, Buckberry J, Marquez-Grant N. Age estimation. Ann Human Biol. 2015;42(4):299–301. doi: 10.3109/03014460.2015.1089627
  5. Okşayan R, Asarkaya B, Palta N, et al. Effects of edentulism on mandibular morphology: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Sci World J. 2014;2014:254932. doi: 10.1155/2014/254932
  6. Ghosh S, Vengal M, Pai KM, Abhishek K. Remodeling of the antegonial angle region in the human mandible: a panoramic radiographic cross-sectional study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(5):e802–807. doi: 10.4317/medoral.15.e802
  7. Uthman AT, Al-Rawi NH, Al-Timimi JF. Evaluation of foramen magnum in gender determination using helical CT scanning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41(3):197–202. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/21276789
  8. Rajkumari S, Nikitha K, Monisha S, et al. Role of Orthopantamograph in forensic identification: a retrospective study among chennai population. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019;11(Suppl 2):S393–S396. doi: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_43_19
  9. Nagare SP, Chaudhari RS, Birangane RS, Parkarwar PC. Sex determination in forensic identification, a review. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2018;10(2):61–66. doi: 10.4103/jfo.jfds_55_17
  10. Sairam V, Geethamalika MV, Kumar PB, et al. Determination of sexual dimorphism in humans by measurements of mandible on digital panoramic radiograph. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016;7(4):434–439. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.194110
  11. Franklin D, Cardini A, Higgins PO, et al. Mandibular morphology as an indicator of human subadult age: geometric morphometric approaches. J Forensic Sci. 2008;4(2):91–99. doi: 10.1007/s12024-007-9015-7
  12. Dudar JC, Pfeiffer S, Saunders SR. Evaluation of morphological and histological adult skeletal age-at-death estimation techniques using ribs. J Forensic Sci. 1993;38(3):677–685.
  13. Sairam V, Potturi GR, Praveen B, Vikas G. Assessment of effect of age, gender, and dentoalveolar changes on mandibular morphology: a digital panoramic study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9(1):49–54. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_704_17
  14. Chole RH, Patil RN, Chole SB, et al. Association of mandible anatomy with age, gender, and dental status: a radiographic study. ISRN Radiology. 2013;2013:453763. doi: 10.5402/2013/453763
  15. Joo JK, Lim YJ, Kwon HB, Ahn SJ. Panoramic radiographic evaluation of the mandibular morphological changes in elderly dentate and edentulous subjects. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2012;71(2):357–362. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2012.690446
  16. Larheim TA, Svanaes DB. Reproducibility of rotational panoramic radiography: mandibular linear dimensions and angles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986;90(1):45–51. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(86)90026-0
  17. Humphrey LT, Dean MC, Stringer CB. Morphological variation in great ape and modern human mandibles. J Anat. 1999;195(Pt 4):491–513. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1999.19540491.x
  18. Morant GM, Collett M, Adyanthaya NK. A biometric study of the human mandible. Biometrika. 1936;28(1-2):84–122.
  19. Hrdlicka A. Lower jaw further studies. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1940;27(3):383–467.
  20. Mangla R, Singh N, Dua V, et al. Evaluation of mandibular morphology in different facial types. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011;2(3):200–206. doi: 10.4103/0976-237x.86458

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Bilateral angular measurement of the gonial angle.

下载 (101KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. Length of the condyle bilaterally.

下载 (93KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 3. Ramus length bilaterally.

下载 (103KB)
索引源数据
5. Fig. 4. Cortical bone thickness bilaterally.

下载 (105KB)
索引源数据
6. Fig. 5. Width of the Ramal notch bilaterally.

下载 (107KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2022

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎 4.0国际许可协议的许可。
##common.cookie##