Teaching Philosophy: A Utopian and Realistic Approach
- Autores: Zolotukhina-Abolina E.V.1
-
Afiliações:
- Southern Federal University
- Edição: Volume 29, Nº 4 (2025): IN SEARCH OF A STRATEGY FOR TEACHING PHILOSOPHY: RUSSIAN AND WORLD EXPERIENCE
- Páginas: 1056-1071
- Seção: IN SEARCH OF A STRATEGY FOR TEACHING PHILOSOPHY: RUSSIAN AND WORLD EXPERIENCE
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-2302/article/view/362043
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-4-1056-1071
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IOXZIR
- ID: 362043
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
The study is devoted to the consideration of different ways of meaningful presentation of philosophical knowledge in its teaching in a modern university. At the beginning, the author captures the not very honorable place of philosophy in the modern educational process aimed at practical applied tasks and taking place in corporate universities that require profitability from teaching. Further, we are talking about the fact that philosophy is still needed in the educational process, and not only for professional teachers, but primarily for students, as well as for the state, which is raising new generations. The author emphasizes that the approach to choosing subjects for teaching in limited programs can be “utopian”, that is, dreamy, but unable to really arouse students’ interest in the subject, and realistic, addressing the lively interests of today’s young people. The author considers the utopian attitude towards teaching philosophy to be the desire to immerse the audience as much as possible in the historical and philosophical process or in specialized epistemological and methodological issues. Both the distant past and narrowly epistemological issues are far from the “average student” who is essentially taking a survey course. The author considers it a realistic approach to address, first of all, anthropological-existential and axiological-ideological issues. This latter is really in demand by the state, which pays for education and is interested in the education of young citizens who are called upon to fully build the future. If anthropological and existential issues answer students’ personal questions, then the question of social and cultural values meets the interests of society. At the end of the study, it is emphasized that the models of realistic philosophy teaching may be different, depending on the academic freedom of the teacher and his personal choice.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
Elena Zolotukhina-Abolina
Southern Federal University
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: elena_zolotuhina@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-5954-2758
Código SPIN: 5235-1588
DSc in Philosophy, Professor
105 Bolshaya Sadovaya St., Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russian FederationBibliografia
- Kondratieva SB. Teaching philosophy in higher education: problems, forecasts, prospects. Problems of pedagogy and psychology. 2018;(4):122–131. (In Russian). doi: 10.17805/zpu.2018.4.12 EDN: XQEGZR
- Gusev DA. On the content of the philosophy course in secondary and higher schools. Science and school. 2002;(4):2–7. (In Russian).
- Gusev DA. The role and significance of skepticism in teaching philosophy. Questions of philosophy. 2007;(2):168–173. (In Russian). EDN: HYUGBL
- Volkova E.G. The main problems of teaching philosophy in higher education. Modern education. 2015;(2):80–115. (In Russian). doi: 10.7256/2409-8736.2015.2.14427 EDN: USQWBR
- Bryzgalina EV. Philosophy of education in the context of traditions and innovations. In: Man yesterday and today: interdisciplinary research. № 4. Moscow: IFRAN publ.; 2010. P. 3–18. (In Russian).
- Znepolsky B. How philosophy is taught and how it should be taught (French discussion). In: Domestic notes. 2002;(2). Available from: http://maga%zines.russ.ru/oz/2002/ 2/znep.html (accessed: 03.08.2018). (In Russian)
- Karelin VM, Kuznetsova NI, Griftsova IN. “Philosophy” as a training course: changing the concept. Higher education in Russia. 2017;(10):64–74. (In Russian). EDN: ZOWUHB
- Mikeshin MI. Justification of the need for philosophy courses in American technical universities. Notes of the Mining Institute. 2010;187:190–194. (In Russian). EDN: NCKRWF
- Rozov MA. What do we expect from philosophy? (Notes by an old teacher). Higher education in Russia. 2010;(8–9):20–29. (In Russian). EDN: MWDQND
- Yuzhaninova ER. On methods, forms and means of teaching philosophy in higher education. Bulletin of Orenburg State University. 2014;(3):108–113. (In Russian). EDN: SEWKJB
- Svasyan K. Why philosophers were transferred. Made for minds. Available from: https://www.dw.com/ru/почему%перевелись%философы/a%15548297. (accessed: 10.02.2025). (In Russian).
- Pokrovsky NE, Ivanchenko GV. The Universe of solitude. Moscow: Logos; 2008. (In Russian). EDN: RAZREV
- Bryzgalina EV, Kiselev VN. On some characteristics and contradictions in the development of modern education. The electronic scientific publication Almanac Space and Time. 2015;9(1). Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-nekotoryh-harakteristikah-i-protivorechiyah-v-razvitii-sovremennogo-obrazovaniya (accessed: 10.02.2025). EDN: UZETND
- Panarin AS. Strategic instability in the 21st century. Moscow: Algorithm; 2003. (In Russian). EDN: QOSMQN
- Fromm E. Psychoanalysis and Ethics, Moscow: Respublika publ., 1993. (In Russian).
- Mounier E. The Manifesto of Personalism. Moscow: Respublika publ.; 1999. (In Russian).
- Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Moscow: EKSMO publ.; 2019. (In Russian).
Arquivos suplementares

