The Nature of Contemporary Conflicts and Prospects for Adapting Collective Security Systems: A Triadic Approach
- Авторлар: Kharitonova N.I.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Russian State University for the Humanities
- Шығарылым: Том 25, № 1 (2025): Traditional and Non-Traditional Security Threats in the Context of the Formation of a Multipolar World
- Беттер: 18-29
- Бөлім: THEMATIC DOSSIER
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-0660/article/view/320649
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2025-25-1-18-29
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JCLEMN
- ID: 320649
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
The study focuses on the analysis of the nature of modern conflicts, and the prospects for the adaptation of collective security systems in the context of the emergence of a polycentric world order. The analysis draws upon three key factors: the hybridization of conflict interactions in the modern world, the actualization of the civilizational approach in practical international politics, and the legitimacy more or less inherent in collective actions. The purpose of the study is providing an answer to the question of whether international organizations will continue to play the role of regulators and insurance mechanisms against new global conflicts in the future. The study’s tasks are threefold: first, to characterize the international context that both shapes and reflects changes in the nature of conflict; second, to identify key changes in the nature of modern conflict interactions; third, to determine new requirements for collective security systems in a polycentric world. The parameters of the problem being analyzed are determined by the fact that the nature of conflicts has changed significantly over the past half-century and continues to change, while changes in the basic principles of the existence of international organizations have either not occurred at all or represent rather modest attempts to define acceptable formats for the world community. This discrepancy signifies a pivotal challenge in contemporary world politics, exemplifying systemic transformations within the international relations framework. The methodological framework of the study incorporates a triadic approach, facilitating the identification of intricate characteristics that define specific phenomena. The use of the triadic method in order to determine the characteristics of modern conflicts (by “coupling” the phenomena of strategy, sovereignty and hybridity) and systems of collective security in the context of polycentrism (by “coupling” the phenomena of civilization, collective action and security) made it possible not only to determine the main parameters of changes of the modern conflicts nature in the transition period and the requirements for collective security systems in the new international political conditions. Furthermore, it has facilitated an exploration of future trends in order to outline the contours of new approaches to analyzing the international situation, taking into account the experience of the current global upheavals.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
Natalia Kharitonova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: natahari@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7980-6562
SPIN-код: 6491-4442
Dr. of Sc. (Political Science), Associate Professor, Chief Research Fellow
Moscow, Russian FederationӘдебиет тізімі
- Akulinin, V. N., & Epifanova, N. S. (2015). The concept of hybrid warfare in the practice of inter-state confrontation. National Interests: Priorities and Security, 11(36), 53-60. (In Russian). EDN: UKTTHJ
- Barantsev, R. G. (1989). System triad - structural cell of synthesis. In D. M. Gvishiani (Ed.), Systemic research: Methodological problems. Yearbook. 1988 (pp. 193-209). Moscow: Nauka publ. (In Russian).
- Barantsev, R. G. (1998). On a trinitary methodology. In T. V. Artemyeva & M. I. Mikeshin (Eds.), The philosophical age. Almanac 7. Between physics and metaphysics: Science and philosophy (pp. 51-61). St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
- Barantsev, R. G. (2000). Universal semantics of triadic structures in science - art - religion. In Z. E. Zhuravleva (Ed.), Languages of science - languages of art (pp. 61-65). Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya publ. (In Russian).
- Bartosh, A. A. (2017). Hybrid warfare paradigm. Security Issues, (3), 44-61. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7543.2017.3.20815; EDN: YRGVOH
- Chizhevskiy, Ya. A. (2016). The development of military-political discourse: Introducing neologisms “asymmetric conflict” and “hybrid war”. Political Science (RU), (2), 269-283. (In Russian). EDN: WCJRLD
- Gapizov, Z. R., & Kharitonova, N. I. (2023). “Crimean issue” and civilizational foundations of Russia’s foreign policy in the context of a global hybrid war. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, 17(4), 112-120. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2023-04-112-120; EDN: JRUANJ
- Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars. Arlington, Virginia: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.
- Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
- Ivanov, V. V., Malinetskiy, G. G., & Sirenko, S. N. (Eds.). (2018). Contours of digital reality: Humanitarian-technological revolution and the choice of the future. Moscow: Lenand publ. (In Russian). EDN: IQZAQM
- Kagan, R. (2018). The jungle grows back: America and our imperiled world. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
- Kaldor, M. (2012). New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Kharitonova, N. I. (2024). CSTO and the problem of hybrid wars. Mezdunarodnaa Zizn’ / International Affairs, (2), 28-37. (In Russian). EDN: PWHGEB
- Kilcullen, D. (2009). The accidental guerrilla: Fighting small wars in the midst of a big one. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kozyrev, G. I. (2013). War as political phenomenon. Sociology, (2), 118-127. (In Russian). EDN: RCFORJ
- Kuchinskaya, M. E. (2018). Hybridization of modern conflicts phenomenon: The Russian and the Western military-political discourses. National Strategy Issues, (6), 122-143. (In Russian). EDN: YUVIGT
- Leshchev, E. N., & Kharitonova, N. I. (2016). Falsification of history as a threat to national security of Russia: Political aspect. Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 11(6), 132-142. (In Russian). EDN: XTDQRL
- Maksimov, A. S. (2021). National security of Russia in the conditions of hybrid warfare. In P. A. Merkulov & O. V. Malakhova (Eds.), Constitutional reform and national development goals of Russia: Socio-economic and political and legal priorities: Collection of articles and reports of the international scientific-practical conference (December 2, 2020) (pp. 169-172). Orel: Srednerusskii institut upravleniya - filial RANKhiGS publ. (In Russian). EDN: ZXHGHM
- Malinetskiy, G. G., Posashkov, S. A., & Skurlyagin, A. A. (2019). Humanitarian and technological revolution, crisis of conscience, risks and future projects. Strategicheskie Prioritety, (1), 48-76. (In Russian). EDN: RWCGPW
- Murray, W., & Mansoor, P. R. (Eds.). (2012). Hybrid warfare: Fighting complex opponents from the ancient world to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139199254
- Popov, P. V. (2019). State-target approach to the hybrid warfare concept. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration, 8(4), 51-53. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26140/anie-2019-0804-0008; EDN: PSDKDJ
- Sokolova, S. N. (2017). Risks and complex security companies: The paradoxes of reality. Bulletin of Polessky State University. Series in Social Sciences and Humanities, (2), 35-40. (In Russian). EDN: ZWGTRF
- Tasmagambetov, I. N. (2024). CSTO: Unchanged priorities in the changing world order. Mezdunarodnaa Zizn’ / International Affairs, (2), 18-27. (In Russian). EDN: CFEXTL
- Tikhanychev, O. V. (2020). Hybrid warfare: A new word in military art or the well forgotten new? Security Issues, (1), 30-43. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7543.2020.1.30256; EDN: JFAPXZ
- Van Creveld, M. (1991). The transformation of war. New York: The Free Press Publishing.
Қосымша файлдар
