Why the Roma National District Was Not Founded in the RSFSR and What it Could Have Been Like
- Authors: Kamenskikh M.S.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Perm Federal Research Center Ural Branch Russian Academy of Sciences
- Perm state national research polytechnic university
- Issue: Vol 23, No 3 (2024): Ethnicity and Power in Russia: History and Modernity
- Pages: 322-334
- Section: ETHNICITY AND POWER IN RUSSIA: HISTORY AND MODERNITY
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2312-8674/article/view/322054
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8674-2024-23-3-322-334
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QGHHBB
- ID: 322054
Cite item
Abstract
The author analyzes the activities of Soviet policy towards the Roma population with a focus on state involvement in agricultural cooperation and the creation of Roma collective farms in the Volga region in the 1930s. During that period, even small national groups gained autonomy in the form of republics, districts, and even regions. Therefore, the question of why territorial autonomy for Roma was not founded in the USSR seems quite currently relevant. Meanwhile, in 1936-1937 in the RSFSR, as part of the policy of settling the Roma, the project for creating the Roma national district in the Kuibyshev region was seriously discussed and considered. The circumstances and reasons for the failure to implement the project of creating the Roma national district in the Volga region are clarified across the article. The basis for the research is the archival materials of the fund of the All-Union Resettlement Committee of the Russian State Academy of Economics (fund 5675) introduced by the author into scientific use for the first time. The sources allow revealing the circumstances of the discussion and preparatory work on the creation of the Roma national district. The funds contain significant information and reports with a detailed description of the Roma collective farms, including those containing ethnographic material. The author concludes that the project of creating the Roma national district was of strategic importance for the Soviet leadership and the authorities made great efforts to implement it. By early 1937, all the necessary conditions for the establishment of the district had been created. However, the reluctance of the lower power structures to host the Roma population, the outbreak of large repressions, the abolition of the All-Union Resettlement Committee, and the change of trends in the national policy prevented the implementation of the project.
About the authors
Mikhail S. Kamenskikh
Perm Federal Research Center Ural Branch Russian Academy of Sciences; Perm state national research polytechnic university
Author for correspondence.
Email: mkamenskih27@gmail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4041-086X
SPIN-code: 3723-3000
PhD in History, Senior Researcher of the Institute of humanitarian studies, Perm Federal Research Center of Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Associate Professor of the Foreign Languages, Linguistics and Translation Department, Perm national research polytechnic university
13a, Lenina St., Perm, 614990, Russia; 29, Komsomolskiy Ave., Perm, 614099, RussiaReferences
- Amanzholova, D.A. “State nation-building. some problems of the soviet model of federalization.” In Rossiiskie regiony: vzgliad v budushchee 11, no. 3-4 (2023): 1-14 (in Russian).
- Bugai, N.F. Tsygane Rossii: obshchestvo, adaptatsiia, konsensus (1900-2010) [Gypsies of Russia. Community. Adaptation. Consensus]. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole Publ., 2012 (in Russian).
- Chernykh, A.V. “The Kalderash Gypsies of Russiain Industrial Cooperation of the1920s-1930s.” Social Inclusion 8, no. 2 (2020): 358-366.
- Chernykh, A.V., and Kamenskikh, M.S. “Gypsies of the Urals in the National Economic Policy of the Soviet State of the 1920-1930s.” RUDN Journal of Russian History 16, no. 4 (2017): 10-17 (in Russian), https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8674-2020-19-4-851-868
- Chernykh, A.V., ed. Tsyganskie soobshchestva v sotsiume: adaptatsiia, integratsiia, vzaimodeistvie [Gypsy communities in society: adaptation, integration, interaction]. St. Petersburg: Mamatov Publ., 2022 (in Russian).
- Cheshko, S.V. Raspad SSSR: etnopoliticheskii analiz [The collapse of the USSR: ethnopolitical analysis]. Moskow: IEA RAN Publ., 2000 (in Russian).
- Demeter, N., Bessonov, N., and Kutenkov, V. Istoriia tsygan - novyi vzgliad [History of gypsies - new mind]. Voronezh: Voronezh Publ., 2000 (in Russian).
- Demeter, N.G., and Chernykh, A.V., eds. Tsigane [Gypsies]. Moscow: IEA RAN Publ., 2018 (in Russian).
- Dimanshtein, S.M. Evreiskaia avtonomnaia oblast - detishche Oktiabrskoi revoliutsii [The Jewish Autonomous Region is the brainchild of the October Revolution]. Moscow: Der Emes Publ., 1936 (in Russian).
- Easter, J. Sovetskoe gosudarstvennoe stroitelstvo. Sistema lichnykh sviazei i samoidentifikatsiia elity v Sovetskoi Rossii [Soviet State Building. The system of personal connections and self-identification of the elite in Soviet] Russia]. Moscow: ROSSPEN; Prezidentskii tsentr B.N. Yeltsina Publ., 2010 (in Russian).
- Hirsch, F. Empire of nations: ethnographic knowledge and the making of the Soviet Union. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2005.
- Hosking, D. Praviteli i zhertvy. Russkie v Sovetskom Soiuze [Rulers and Victims. Russian in the Soviet Union]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2012 (in Russian).
- Istyagin, V.R. “Realization of state resettlement policy in the north Caucasian region at the initial stage of collectivization: resettlement of gipsy, Koreans and Assyrians.” Humanities and law research, no. 4 (2015): 60-66, 2015 (in Russian).
- Ivaschenko, V.I. Tsyganskie sud'by. Istoriia, trud, etnografiia [Gypsies destiny: history, work, ethnography]. Rostov on Don: Donizdat Publ., 2011 (in Russian).
- Kamenskikh, M.S. “The involvement of the Gypsy population in collectivization process in the Urals in 1920s - 1930s.” Perm Federal Research Centre Journal, no. 4 (2017): 83-90. (in Russian), https://doi.org/10.7242/1998-2097/2017.4.13
- Kilin, A.P. “Sozdanie tsyganskikh kolkhozov na Urale: Interesy storon [Creating new kolkhozes in the Ural: sides interests].” In Materialy konferentsii: Chetvertye Tatishchevskie chteniia. Priroda, byt i kul'tura Urala [Conference materials: Fourth Tatishchev readings. Nature, life and culture of the Urals], 261-264. Yekaterinburg: Bank kulturnoi informatsii Publ., 2002 (in Russian).
- Martin, T. Imperiia ‘polozhitelnoi deiatelnosti.’ Natsii i natsionalizm v USSR, 1923-1939 [The Empire of ‘Affirmative action.’ Nations and nationalism in the USSR, 1923-1939], Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2011 (in Russian).
- Mastyugina, T.M., Perepelkin, L.S., and Stelmakh, V.G. Natsionalnaia politika v Rossii: XVI - nachalo XXI veka [National Policy in Russia: XVI - the Beginning of the XXI Century], Moscow: Forum Publ., 2013 (in Russian).
- Platunov, N.I. Pereselencheskaia politika Sovetskogo gosudarstva i ee osushchestvlenie v SSSR (1917-1941 gg.) [Resettlement policy of the Soviet state and its implementation in the USSR (1917 - June 1941)]. Tomsk: Tomsk University Publishing House, 1976 (in Russian).
- Shaidurov, V.N. “Tsygane SSSR i zemleustroistvo vo vtoroi polovine 1920-kh godov [Gypsies of the USSR and land management in the second half of the 1920s].” In Vyzov v povsednevnoi zhizni naseleniia Rossii: istoriia i sovremennost'. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, 289-293. St. Petersburg: Leningrad State University Publ., 2021 (in Russian).
- Shaydurov, V.N. “Gypsies in Siberia (late XVIII century - XX century) [Tsygane v Sibiri (konets XVIII v. - XX v.)].” Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya, no. 2 (2022): 60-72 (in Russian).
- Tishkov, V.A. Rekviem po etnosu [Requiem for ethnos]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2003 (in Russian).
- Tomohiko, U., ed. Comparing modern empires: imperial rule and decolonization in the changing world order. Sapporo: Slavic-Eurasian Research Center, Hokkaido University, 2018.
- Vdovin, A.I. Russkie v XX veke. Tragedii i triumfy velikogo naroda [Russian in the twentieth century. Tragedies and triumphs of great people]. Moscow: Veche Publ., 2013 (in Russian).
- Zorin, V.Yu. Natsional'naia politika rossiiskogo gosudarstva v XX - nachale XXI veka.: ucheb. posobie dlia bakalavriata i magistratury [National policy of the Russian state in the XX - early XXI century: textbook. allowance for undergraduate and graduate programs]. Moscow: Iurait Publ., 2018 (in Russian).
Supplementary files
