The evolution of legal proceedings in the Roman land registry
- 作者: Gvozdeva I.A.1
-
隶属关系:
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- 期: 卷 17, 编号 3 (2025): Antiquity in the Mediterranean Region and pre-Columbian America
- 页面: 275-285
- 栏目: LAW AND POWER IN ANCIENT ROME
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2312-8127/article/view/332262
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2025-17-3-275-285
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TQJULX
- ID: 332262
如何引用文章
详细
The relevance of this study is due to the fact that it is based on the analysis of a source that has not been sufficiently studied in Russian historiography - Corpus Agrimensorum Romanorum. Using a comprehensive method of historical research, the author reveals the evolution of legal proceedings in the Roman land registry. The purpose of the author is to trace the allocation of land in the archaic and pre-classical periods of the development of the Ius Civile in Rome, as well as to point out the changes in judicial proceedings that determined the course of its development in Roman agrimensura. The author came to the following conclusions that, starting from the period of Emperor Augustus, the forma plan of land surveying was worked out, which was a scheme of the most perfect system of field division - centuriation; and also that during the entire pre-classical period of the Ius Civile in Rome, elements of archaic judicial procedure were preserved: thus, locus forever retained the category of Publicus, except Moreover, the influence of archaism is manifested in how a compromise outcome of a dispute becomes the preferred solution to land conflicts. The formulary process, which based the evidence on the law of the magistrate, built the category of “segments from the boundary line” into the decision of the process of boundary claims based on the interdictum. Thus, the actiones finium regundorum group of claims was singled out, which completed the formation of Roman land law.
作者简介
Inna Gvozdeva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: innagvozdeva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6075-9033
SPIN 代码: 9189-1625
PhD in Historical Sciences, Associate professor, Department of History of the Ancient World, Faculty of Historical Sciences
27 Lomonosovsky Avenue, bldg. 4, Moscow, 119234, Russian Federation参考
- Gvozdeva IA, Gvozdeva TB. Agri division in Roman agrimensura. Agrarnoe i zemel’noe pravo. 2020;(9):95–98. (In Russ.). EDN: DBWWPQ
- Moatti C. Archives et partage de la terrе dans le monde romain (IIe siècle avant — Ier siècle après J.–C.). Roma; 1993.
- Meynier A, Grosjean G. La centuriatione romaine de ea colonie de Valense. Gallai. 1958;16:281–284.
- Gvozdeva IA. “Pertica” and “praefectura” as part of the Roman cadastre. In: Ekonomika, pravo, vlast’ v drevnem mire. Posvyashchaetsya pamyati V.I. Kuzishchina. Saint Petersburg: Alethea; 2021;187:162–192. (In Russ.). EDN: RNALXX
- Dilke OAW. The roman Land surveyors. New York: Ваrnes and Noble; 1971.
- Gvozdeva IA. Ager Colonicus in Roman agrimony of the Republic period. Agrarnoe i zemel’noe pravo. 2020;(7):27–30. (In Russ.). EDN: QGWFDB
- Schulten A. Die Römische Flurteilung und ihre Reste. Berlin; 1898.
- Salmon ET. Roman Colonization Under the Republic (Aspects of Greek and Roman life). London: Thames and Hudson; 1969.
- Castаgnoli F. Le ricerche sui resti della Centuriazione. Roma: Ed. di Storia e Letteratura; 1958.
- Gvozdeva IA, Gvozdeva TB. Archaic and formal process in the land law of Ancient Rome. Agrarnoe i zemel‘noe pravo. 2017;(2):30–35. (In Russ.). EDN: YSRHBH
- Behrends O. Bodenhoheit und privates Bodeneigentum im Grenzwesen Roms. In: Die Römische Feldmeßkunst. Interdisziplinäre Beitrage zu ihrer Bedeutung für die Zivilizationsgeschichte Roms. Göttingen, 1992, s. 192–280.
- Capogrossi Colognesi L. La struttura della proprietà e la formazione dei “iura praediorum” nell’età republicana. V. 1. Milano, 1969.
- Behrends O. Les conditions des terres dans L’Empire Romain. In: De la terre au сiel. Paysages et cadastres antiques. V. II. PUFC: PU Franche-Comte. 2004, p. 6–10.
- Gvozdeva IA. Location in Roman agrimensura. RUDN Journal of World History. 2024;16(3):267–273. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2024-16-3-267-273 EDN: KEWSHG
- Gvozdeva TB, Gvozdeva IA. Controversy — a category of Roman land law. Sovremennyi yurist. 2017;(1):91–101. (In Russ.). EDN: YJYGON
- Gvozdeva IA. Land law in the agrarian cadastre of August. In: Istoriya drevnikh tsivilizatsii. Gosudarstvo i pravo Drevnego Rima. N. Novgorod; 2006, p. 245–260. (In Russ.).
- Campbell B. The Writings of the Roman Land Surveyors: Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies, 2000.
- Gvozdeva IA. The agrarian dispute de loco in the writings of Roman surveyors. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 8. Istoriya. 2001;(2):3–16. (In Russ.). EDN: YXDSHR
- Rudorff A. Gromatische Institutionen. In: Blume F, Lachmann K, Mommsen Th, Rudorff A. Die Schriften der römischen Feldmesser. Bd. 2. Berlin, 1852. S. 227–464.
- Hinrichs FT. Die Geschichte der gromatischen Institutionen. Wiesbaden, 1974.
- Gvozdeva IA. Lease in ownership relations at Ager Colonicus in Rome I–II centuries A.D. RUDN Journal of World History. 2022;14(3):289–296. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2022-14-3-289-296 EDN: HVEQHS
- Schulten A. Die Lex Manciana, eine Africanische Domänenordung. In: Abhandlungen der der Königlich Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Bd. 2. Nr. 3. Weidmann, 1897.
- Campbell B. Shaping the rural environment surveyors in ancient Rome. Journal of Roman Studies. 1996;(86):74–99.
- Fraccaro P. Agrimensura. In: Encoclopedia Italiana di scienza, lettere ed arti. Milano; 1929. Vol. 1. p. 985–989.
- Burdese A. Studi sull’Ager Publicus. Torino; 1974.
补充文件
