Evaluation of results of combined treatment in patients with disseminated ovarian cancer
- Authors: Iurova M.V.1,2, Khabas G.N.2, Pavlovich S.V.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
- Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
- Issue: Vol 24, No 2 (2022)
- Pages: 132-139
- Section: ORIGINAL ARTICLE
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2079-5831/article/view/104395
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.26442/20795696.2022.2.201438
- ID: 104395
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. According to the modern concept of surgical treatment of ovarian cancer (OC) it is necessary to perform cytoreductive surgery (CRS) without residual tumor in order to achieve more favorable oncological prognoses. However, the possibilities of achieving it with a disseminated process (stages III–IV) are limited, and therefore, for some patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is the optimal initial treatment.
Aim. To compare the duration of progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with advanced OC after treatment, as well as to assess the value of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in predicting this outcome.
Materials and methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 78 patients with stages III–IV OC, who received combined treatment between January 2016 and March 2020 (54 patients after primary CRS (PCRS)+platinum-based chemotherapy (CT), 24 patients after NACT+interval CRS (ICRS)+postoperative CT. The predictive value of the PNI was calculated.
Results. The complete PCRS is associated with increased PFS: after complete PCRS – 32±11.21 months (95% confidence interval – CI 10.09–53.97); after optimal PCRS – 22±3.46 months (95% CI 15.21–28.79); after suboptimal PCRS – 14±7 months (95% CI 0.28–27.72). Performing a complete ICRS is associated with decreased PFS compared to PCRS, even if the complete CRS is achieved: after complete ICRS – 14±3.34 months (95% CI 7.46–20.54); after optimal ICRS – 17±2.16 months (95% CI 12.77–21.23); after suboptimal ICRS – 7 months. PNI≥27.86 correlates with an increased probability of complete PCRS in patients with advanced PCR (AUC 94.3, sensitivity – 80%, specificity – 91.7%; p<0.001).
Conclusion. Achieving complete PCRS in patients with disseminated OC leads to an improvement in the oncological outcome. The prognostic value of pre-treatment calculation of PNI has been revealed: an increased PNI is associated with more favorable perioperative outcomes. Objective criteria should be developed for a strictly reasoned refusal to carry out the first stage of surgical treatment due to the obviously less favorable prognosis of the tactics of "NACT+ICRS+CT".
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Mariia V. Iurova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Author for correspondence.
Email: m_yurova@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0179-7635
Graduate Student
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowGrigory N. Khabas
Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: g_khabas@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5011-9152
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, MoscowStanislav V. Pavlovich
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Email: s_pavlovich@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1313-7079
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowReferences
- Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2019 году. Под ред. Каприна А.Д., Старинского В.В., Шахзадовой А.О. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена − филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2020 [Sostoianie onkologicheskoi pomoshchi naseleniiu Rossii v 2019 godu. Pod red. Kaprina AD, Starinskogo VV, Shakhzadovoi AO. Moscow: MNIOI im. PA Gertsena − filial FGBU “NMITs radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2020 (in Russian)].
- Назаренко Т.А., Ашрафян Л.А., Джанашвили Л.Г., Мартиросян Я.О. Сохранение репродуктивного материала у онкологических больных как медико-социальная и организационная проблема. Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена. 2020;9(1):60-5 [Nazarenko TA, Ashrafian LA, Dzhanashvili LG, Martirosyan YO. Retention of reproductive material in cancer patients as a sociomedical and organizational problem. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2020;9(1):60-5 (in Russian)]. doi: 10.17116/onkolog2020901160
- Tomao F, Di Pinto A, Sassu CM, et al. Fertility preservation in ovarian tumours. Ecancermedicalscience. 2018;12:885. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.885
- Ashraf MA, Dasari P. Outcome of fertility-preserving surgery for ovarian malignancy in young women. Case Rep. 2018;1(1):51-4.
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590
- Состояние онкологической помощи населению России В 2020 году. Под ред. Каприна А.Д., Старинского В.В., Шахзадовой А.О. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена − филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2021 [Sostoianie onkologicheskoi pomoshchi naseleniiu Rossii V 2020 godu. Pod red. Kaprina AD, Starinskogo VV, Shakhzadovoi AO. Moscow: MNIOI im. PA Gertsena − filial FGBU “NMITs radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2021 (in Russian)].
- Colombo N, Sessa C, du Bois A, et al. ESMO–ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(5):672-705. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz062
- Querleu D, Planchamp F, Chiva L, et al. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer Surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27(7):1534-42. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001041
- Armstrong DK, Alvarez RD, Bakkum-Gamez JN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Ovarian Cancer Including Fallopian Tube Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cancer. 2021;3:1-254. Available at: https://www.lissod.com.ua/doctor/files/ovarian-Рак%20яичников.pdf Accssed: 15.08.2021.
- Koirala P, Moon AS, Chuang L. Clinical Utility of Preoperative Assessment in Ovarian Cancer Cytoreduction. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(8):568. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10080568
- Froyman W, Landolfo C, De Cock B, et al. Risk of complications in patients with conservatively managed ovarian tumours (IOTA5): a 2-year interim analysis of a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(3):448-58. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30837-4
- Sugarbaker PH. Comprehensive management of peritoneal surface malignancy using cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: the Washington Cancer Institute approach. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009;10(12):1965-77. doi: 10.1517/14656560903044974
- Sugarbaker PH. Preoperative Assessment of Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Metastases for Complete Cytoreduction. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2016;7:295-302. doi: 10.1007/s13193-016-0518-0
- Sugarbaker PH, Van der Speeten K, Stuart OA. Pharmacologic rationale for treatments of peritoneal surface malignancy from colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2010;2(1):19-30. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i1.19
- du Bois A, Reuss A, Pujade-Lauraine E, et al. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l'Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer. 2009;115(6):1234-44. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24149
- Chi DS, Eisenhauer EL, Zivanovic O, et al. Improved progression-free and overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer as a result of a change in surgical paradigm. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.018
- Böhm S, Faruqi A, Said I, et al. Chemotherapy Response Score : Development and Validation of a System to Quantify Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(22):2457-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.5212
- Cohen PA, Powell A, Böhm S, et al. Pathological chemotherapy response score is prognostic in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma : A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;154(2):441-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.679
- Meyer LA, Cronin AM, Sun CC, et al. Use and Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(32):3854-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.1239
- Onda T, Satoh T, Ogawa G, et al. Comparison of survival between primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers in phase III randomised trial. Eur J Cancer. 2020;130:114-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.020
- Fagotti A, Ferrandina MG, Vizzielli G, et al. Randomized trial of primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (SCORPION–NCT01461850). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020;30(11):1657-64. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001640
- Nougaret S, Addley HC, Colombo PE, et al. Ovarian Carcinomatosis: how the radiologist can help plan the surgical approach. Radiographics. 2012;32(6):1775-800. doi: 10.1148/rg.326125511
- Komura N, Mabuchi S, Yokoi E, et al. Prognostic significance of the pretreatment prognostic nutritional index in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2019;10(38):3605-13. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26914
- Feng Z, Wen H, Ju X, et al. The preoperative prognostic nutritional index is a predictive and prognostic factor of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):883. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4732-8
- Demir A, Alan O, Koca S, Surmeli H. The Relationship Between the Prognostic Nutritional Index and Overall Survival in Elderly Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. EJMI. 2020;4(2):269-73. doi: 10.14744/ejmi.2020.30288
- Pasha K, Ramesh Kumar B, Macherla R, et al. Biochemical Markers of Ascitic Fluid to Differentiate Ovarian Cancer from Liver Cirrhosis Patients. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(6):BC01-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2020/44135.13765
- Zhang W, Ye B, Liang W, Ren Y. Preoperative prognostic nutritional index is a powerful predictor of prognosis in patients with stage III ovarian cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9548. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10328-8
- Miao Y, Li S, Yan Q, et al. Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients Treated with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. Oncol Res Treat. 2016;39(11):712-9. doi: 10.1159/000452263
- Dai D, Balega J, Sundar S, et al. Serum Albumin as a Predictor of Survival after Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer (AOC): A Retrospective Study. J Invest Surg. 2022;35(2):426-31. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1827314
Supplementary files
