Pets as a source of emotional support: Philosophical understanding of the living presence
- Авторлар: Stroganov D.A.1,2, Valyaeva K.I.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Kozma Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University
- Privolzhsky Research Medical University
- Шығарылым: Том 17, № 3 (2025)
- Беттер: 10-21
- Бөлім: Individual, Society, and State in Philosophical Perspective
- ##submission.datePublished##: 31.10.2025
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2077-1770/article/view/362062
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/3033-5981-2025-17-3-524
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MVDVIE
- ID: 362062
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
Background. Today, pets are not just a form of leisure or an element of everyday life, but important assistants in a person's spiritual life and performers of philosophical meaning. The fast pace of life, the digitization of communication, and the gradual disappearance of traditional forms of communication lead to a deep sense of loneliness and inner division. Against this backdrop, a contradiction arises: at a time when people are increasingly surrounded by technology, they are increasingly seeking solace in the silent and living – in animals.
The purpose of the study is to examine the philosophical significance of interaction with animals as a form of emotional support and physical empathy, a source of living presence. Pets provide emotional support through their presence, as well as a sense of acceptance and care. The study discusses how, through contact with animals, people restore their connection with nature, other people, and their own bodies.
Research methods. The study uses methods of analysis of literature sources, description and generalization, as well as phenomenological principles of obviousness and intentionality.
Results. The study found that animals play a key role in human emotional life, acting as mediators between culture and nature, and helping to restore lost connections with the surrounding world and with oneself. It has been proven that an animal is not an object, but a phenomenon of co-presence, which, in turn, helps humans in the process of restoring the ontological value lost in the context of technologization.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
Dmitry Stroganov
Kozma Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University; Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: stroganoff.dmitry2012@yandex.ru
Senior Lecturer, Department of General history, Classical Disciplines and Law; Senior Lecturer of the Department of Foreign Languages
Ресей, 1, Ulyanov Str., Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russian Federation; 10/1, Minin and Pozharsky Sq., Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
Kseniya Valyaeva
Kozma Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University
Email: valyaevaksenia@gmail.com
student
Ресей, 1, Ulyanov Str., Nizhniy Novgorod, 603950, Russian Federation
Әдебиет тізімі
- Girenok, F. I. (2019). Philosophical origins of nonhuman anthropology. Questions of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(1), 8–13.
- Ivanova, I. G. (2019). Problems of empathy in the modern world. Bulletin of Psychology, 4, 77–85. Retrieved April 29, 2025, from https://psy.su/feed/10996/
- Ilyin, E. P. (2004). Psychology of love and hatred. Saint Petersburg: Piter, pp. 111–134. Retrieved April 29, 2025, from https://www.klex.ru/lbb
- LéviStrauss, C. (2010). Thought and nature. Questions of Philosophy, 8, 68–79. Retrieved April 29, 2025, from https://vphil.ru/index.php?id=191&option=com_content&task=view
- Lysenko, V. G. (2023). Knowing animal consciousness as a way of human selfknowledge. Questions of Philosophy, 12, 137–154.
- MerleauPonty, M. (1994). The structure of behavior. Moscow: Moscow University Press, pp. 25–45. Retrieved April 29, 2025, from https://staff.tiiame.uz/storage/users/425/books/JUy3qFisXLZO19gWfpZ6KtZEoNmvE4FkdMfLGL6H.pdf
- Mustafazade, R. Sh. O. (2022). Transformation of ideas about the status of animals in philosophy of law. In E. A. Frolova (Ed.), Philosophy of law. Essays: Monograph (pp. 231–248). Moscow.
- Noddings, N. (2015). The ethics of care: A feminist alternative to classical ethics. Ethical Thought, 1, 12–25. Retrieved April 29, 2025, from https://iphras.ru/uplfile/root/biblio/em/em1/12.pdf
- Popova, O. V. (2023). The animal turn in philosophy and bioethics and the Kantian line in defending animal rights. Philosophical Journal, 16(2), 78–95.
- Rzhavitina, A. A. (2022). The image of the animal in culture: Dynamics of ideas in the history of philosophical and humanistic cognition. Chelyabinsk Humanitarian, 2(59), 48–55.
- Saparova, S. K. (2018). Empathy and morality in the theory and practice of social work. Social Work: Theory and Practice, 2, 33–42.
- Sychev, I. A., & Nekrasov, S. N. (2022). Do animals think? The history of posing the question and results of discussions. In Social and Humanitarian Sciences: Modern Problems: Collection of Articles (pp. 357–362). Yekaterinburg.
- Heidegger, M. (2003). Being and time. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities, pp. 56–72. Retrieved April 29, 2025, from https://imwerden.de/pdf/heidegger_vremya_i_bytie_1993.pdf
- Khodykin, A. V. (2021). Development of contemporary philosophy of animal rights: Analysis of foreign studies. In Ontological and Sociocultural Foundations of an Alternative Globalization Project: Proceedings of the 1st International Online Scientific Conference (pp. 342–346). Yekaterinburg.
- Chepeleva, N. Yu. (2025). The problem of animal thinking: Immanuel Kant’s perspective. Philosophical Sciences, 68(2), 67–87.
Қосымша файлдар


