Birth and its Civil Consequences
- Authors: Ostanina E.1
-
Affiliations:
- Chelyabinsk State University
- Issue: Vol 17, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 136-160
- Section: Russian Law: Condition, Perspectives, Commentaries
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2072-8166/article/view/317728
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2024.4.136.160
- ID: 317728
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The development of medical technology has made the process of human life development more accessible for observation and has raised several legal problems, including questions about the legal nature of the embryo. The subject of the study is the question of the moment of the beginning of human legal personality. The aim of the article is to find out whether the classical rule that the legal personality of a person arises from the moment of birth needs to be revised taking into account new medical and legal achievements. The research methods are comparative-legal method and techniques of analytical jurisprudence. Conclusions are suggested for discussion. The embryo and foetus cannot be classified as either subjects or things; the author proposes the conclusion that the embryo is an object of civil rights of a special kind, closely related to personal intangible goods. None of the attempts to find any other moment of the emergence of legal personality than birth is free from conventionality. The doctrine of the stages of development of legal personality seems promising. The legal nature of the zygote is not equal to the legal nature of the foetus in its eighth month of development. As the human organism develops, the protection afforded to it by the law increases. However, even at an early stage of its development, future human life must be respected and protected by the law. Therefore, the embryo invitro cannot be recognized as a thing, it is a special object of law. At the same time, germ cells contain only a part of genetic information, so it seems possible to apply to them the norms of civil law on things. Claims “wrongful birth” and “wrongful life” are considered, it is emphasized that the possibility of such claims should not lead to a denial of the value of life; the preservation of life cannot be considered as a special case of harm.
Keywords
About the authors
E. Ostanina
Chelyabinsk State University
Email: elenaostanina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0026-3161
References
- Aleynikova V.V. (2022) The civil status of embryos: in search of a balance of interests. Zakon=Law, no. 12, pp. 46–65 (in Russ.)
- Beckmann R. (2003) A growing right to life? Reply to Dreier. Journal of Legal Policy, no. 3, pp. 97–101.
- Belova D.A. (2020) Legal status of the embryo. Semeynoe i zhilishnoe pravo=Family and Housing Law, no. 3, pp. 6–8 (in Russ.)
- Bogdanova E.E. (2019) On the rights to human biomaterial. Grazhdanskoe pravo=Civil Law, no. 4, pp. 28–32 (in Russ.)
- Dreier H. (2002) Stages of prenatal life protection. Zeitschrift fur Rechtspolitik, no. 9, pp. 377–424.
- Druzhinina Yu.F. (2017) Legal regime of the embryo in vitro. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava=Journal of Russian Law, no. 12, pp. 129–140 (in Russ.).
- Fedorova M.G., Latypova I.V., Vishnyakova J.S. (2022) Embryogenesis. Penza: University, 60 p. (in Russ.)
- Fedoseeva N.N., Frolova E.A. (2008) Determinination of legal status of an embryo in international and Russian law. Meditcinskoe pravo=Medical Law, no. 1, pp. 36–40 (in Russ.)
- Glandin S.V. (2014) Status of the human embryo in the light of the right for respect for personal and family life in European and Russian law. Zakon=Law, no. 4, pp. 136–141 (in Russ.)
- Gongalo B. M. (2021) Selected works. Vol. 5. Moscow: Statut, 310 p. (in Russ.)
- Gongalo B.M. (2020) The legal personality of a person. In: Civil law of the welfare state: collection of articles. V.V. Vitryansky, E.A. Sukhanov (eds.). Moscow: Statut, pp. 136–148.
- Herdegen M. (2001) Human dignity in the flow of bioethical discourse. Juristen Zeitung, no. 15, pp. 773–779.
- Korobeev A.I., Shirshov A.A. (2020) Criteria of live birth in determining life as an object of criminal law protection. Russkyi zakon=Lex Russica, no. 5, pp. 64–72 (in Russ.)
- Lebedeva O.Yu. (2013) Determining origin of children born by assisted reproduction methods: review of legislation and law enforcement practice in Europe, Canada and the USA. Semeinoe i zhilishnoe pravo=Family and Housing law, no. 5, pp. 32–35 (in Russ.)
- Levushkin A.N. (2019) Unborn children: consideration of interests and rights in civil turnover and medical practice. Zakony Rossii=Laws of Russia, no. 6, pp. 18–23 (in Russ.)
- Likholaya V.A. (2015) Correlation of biomedical ethics and legal regulation in the field of protection of unborn life. In: Biomedical law in Russia and abroad. Moscow: Prospekt, pp. 271–282 (in Russ.)
- Mutovin G.R. (2010) Clinical genetics. Genomics and proteomics of hereditary pathology. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 832 p. (in Russ.)
- Novoselova L.A. (2021) Disposal of the human body: a civil law aspect. Zakon=Law, no. 8, pp. 115–130 (in Russ.)
- Podrabinok E.M. (2012) Commentary to chapter 5 of Law on Acts of civil status. In: Commentary on the Family Code of the Russian Federation, Federal Laws on Guardianship and on acts of civil status. P.V. Krasheninnikov (ed.). Moscow: Statut, pp. 592–600 (in Russ.)
- Pokrovsky I.A. (1917) Main issues of civil law. Petrograd: Pravo Press, 327 p. (in Russ.)
- Quaas A.M. (2019) A new global perspective: Geographic variations in the use of preimplantation genetic technologies to screen human embryos. In: Human Embryos and Preimplantation Genetic Technologies. Ethical, Social, and Public Policy Aspects. London: Academic Press, pp. 23–28.
- Rager G. (2016) The beginning of individual human life. Journal of the Law of Life, no. 4, pp. 134–142.
- Roller M. (2013) The legal capacity of the Nasciturus. In: Writings on civil law. Vol. 43. Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt, 266 p.
- Scharz K.-A. (2001) Therapeutic cloning — an attack on the right for life and human dignity of the embryo? Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft, № 84, S. 182–210.
- Sergeeva E.S. (2023) Protection of the interests of an unborn child in civil proceedings. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskiy protcess=Arbitration and civil proceedings, no. 9, pp. 7–11 (in Russ.)
- Shershenevich G.F. (2001) Course of civil law. Tula: Autograph, 720 p. (in Russ.)
- Tur M.Ş. (2021) When does human life begin? In: Life protection for the embryo in vitro. Schriften zum Straftrecht, № 374, S.132–154.
- Vereshchagin A. (2020) Surrogacy leads to a mixture of people and things. (Interview with R. Andorno). Zakon=Law, no. 7, pp. 8–25 (in Russ.)
- Viebahn C. (2003) A sketch of embryonic early development of man. In: The moral status of human embryos. Pro and contra species, continuum, identity and potentiality argument. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 269–278.
- Winfield P. H. (1942) The unborn child. Cambridge Law Journal, no. 8, pp. 76–91.
- Winter T. (2002) “Bébé prejudice” and “Child as a harm”. A comparative study on liability for new life in Germany and France. Berlin: Duncker and Humboldt, 194 p.
Supplementary files
