Application of the Principle of Inviolability of the Minimum Propertyin Enforcement Proceedings

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to identify the features of the application of norms-principles and norms-legislative provisions of enforcement proceedings on the example of a minimum of property not subject to recovery. In the article, the author correlated theoretical approaches to the concept of this principle, and also analyzed the latest legislative changes. The author focused on the features of determining the guaranteed minimum on the example of cash, residential premises and luxury goods. Conclusions: The author found discrepancies between the normative content of the principle of inviolability of the minimum property in enforcement proceedings and its purpose. The correlation of abstract norms of law with their interpretation in judicial practice has shown that this principle still depends on the discretion of judges and the socio-economic situation in the country. The inviolability of the minimum property, as a principle-statute, needs to be detailed through special norms, and not general rules.

About the authors

Evgenia Valerievna Sagitova

Russian State University of Justice, Kazan Branch

Email: sagitova-rgup@mail.ru
Lecturer of the Department of Civil Procedure Law Kazan, Russia

References

  1. Bakurova N.N. New models of ensuring human rights in enforcement proceedings: administrative and procedural aspect. Administrative law and process. 2022. No. 3. pp. 70-73.
  2. Baranov A.V. Norms-principles in the mechanism of legal regulation. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. Right. 2016. No. 4 (22). pp. 5-14.
  3. Valeev D.H. The system of procedural guarantees of the rights of citizens and organizations in enforcement proceedings: dissertation of a doctor of jurisprudence. Kazan, 2009. 474 p.
  4. Vstavskaya I.M. On the determination of property immunities of debtors from collection. Law and regulations. 2007. No. 9. pp. 92-94.
  5. Gal'perin M.L. Does enforcement proceedings need a debtor? Bulletin of economic justice of the Russian Federation. 2022. No. 7. pp. 4-11.
  6. Isaenkov A.A. The rule on the inviolability of the minimum property necessary for the existence of the debtor, as a category of Russian enforcement proceedings. Historical and legal problems: a new perspective. 2014. No. 9-1. pp. 192-199.
  7. Kuznecova E.N. Immunity from recovery in relation to certain types of debtor's property (comparative legal analysis based on the legislation of Russia and France). Arbitration and civil process. 2001. No. 4. pp. 37-44.
  8. Nosenko A.S., Nuzhnenko A.A. Social guarantees for low-income citizens in the implementation of enforcement proceedings. In the collection: Technologies of social work with different groups of the population. Materials of the IX All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Rep. editor M.S. Zhilyaev. Chita, 2020, pp. 93-100.
  9. Fomin A.V. Actual problems of enforcement proceedings, ways to solve them. International Journal of the Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2022. No. 1-3 (64). pp. 97-100.
  10. Shevchuk P.P. Actualization of the principles of enforcement proceedings. Administrative and municipal law. 2013. No. 10. pp. 1007-1012.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies