Ways to minimize the risks of introducing AI agents through public administration mechanisms

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Background. The widespread introduction of artificial intelligence technologies has led to an awareness of the risks, the validity of which requires research into the mechanisms of AI operation, as well as the consequences for all aspects of social life and the possibilities of public administration. The lack of transparency for users and consumers regarding the mechanics of AI agents as autonomous systems that solve specific tasks, combined with the comfort provided by the automation of many processes that are already beyond the scope of traditional operations, increases the risk associated with the widespread use of such technologies. The validity of these concerns and the state’s position on these risks have been assessed based on an analysis of the principles of AI agents’ data handling. The article highlights specific risks associated with the implementation of AI agents related to information processing technology.

The purpose is to find ways to minimize the risks of introducing AI agents into social life and the state economy by analyzing the mechanisms of operation of individual autonomous intelligent systems.

Methodology. Abstract logic was used as the main method, and secondary analysis of third-party research was also used.

Results. The risk factors for the functioning of autonomous intelligent systems are summarized, and the directions of state regulation in the field of artificial intelligence technologies are clarified.

Practical implications. The results obtained can be used in the development of government strategies for regulating AI and in the formulation of regulations.

Авторлар туралы

Alla Polyanina

Lobachevsky University; Volga State University of Railway Transport

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: Alker@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2035-9849
SPIN-код: 4324-4300

Professor of the Department of Management and Public Administration, Doctor of Sociological Sciences; Associate Professor

 

Ресей, 23, Gagarin Str., Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod region, 603087, Russian Federation; 3, Komsomolskaya Square, Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod region, 603087, Russian Federation

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Aksyanov, N. S. (2021). Using modern technologies in personnel recruitment. Siberian Journal of Economic and Business Studies, 10(5-1), 68–81.
  2. Volodenkov, S. V., Fedorchenko, S. N., & Pechenkin, N. M. (2024). Risks, threats and challenges of modern socio-political communications in the context of artificial intelligence and neural network technologies development. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 20(3), 474–494.
  3. Grinin, L. E., Grinin, A. L., & Grinin, I. L. (2023). Artificial intelligence: Development and concerns. A glimpse into the future. Article 2. Artificial intelligence: Terra incognita or a controlled force? Philosophy and Society, 4(109), 5–32.
  4. Ignatiev, V. I. (2019). And “another” actor is coming… The emergence of a techno-subject in the context of moving toward technological singularity. Sociology of Science and Technology, 10(1), 64–78.
  5. Kapelyushnikov, R. I. (2025). Artificial intelligence and the problem of singularity in economics. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Issues of Economics], (5), 5–45.
  6. Kozlov, S. D. (2019). Political transformation in the context of approaching the point of technological singularity. Bulletin of the Institute of World Civilizations, 10(1-22), 6–10.
  7. Kurzweil, R. (2018). The evolution of mind, or the endless possibilities of the human brain based on pattern recognition. Moscow: Eksmo, Bombora. (349 pp.).
  8. Lukyanovich, N. V., & Nekrasov, S. A. (2024). Are the risks of artificial intelligence development in the economy and society really new? Contours of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 17(5), 44–60.
  9. Namiot, D. E., & Ilyushin, E. A. (2025). On cybersecurity of AI agents. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 13(9), 13–24.
  10. Nikolaeva, E. M., Nikolaev, M. S., & Vasilyeva, V. S. (2024). Human and artificial intelligence: Prospects and risks of bio-silicon collaboration. Age of Globalization, (2), 151–159.
  11. Rakitov, A. I. (2016). Post-information society. Philosophical Sciences, (12), 7–19.
  12. Alqodsi, E. M., & Gura, D. (2023). High tech and legal challenges: Artificial intelligence caused damage regulation. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2270751. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331188X.2023.2270751
  13. Cyman, D., Gromova, E., & Juchnevicius, E. (2021). Regulation of artificial intelligence in BRICS and the European Union. BRICS Law Journal, 8(1), 86–115. https://doi.org/10.21638/25005.bricslawj.2021.1.05
  14. Gerlich, M. (2024). Brace for impact: Facing the AI revolution and geopolitical shifts in a future societal scenario for 2025–2040. Societies, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14010001
  15. Gurinovich, A. G., & Lapina, M. A. (2022). Legal regulation of artificial intelligence, robots, and robotic objects in the field of social relations. Relacoes Internacionais no Mundo Atual, 1(34), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.22526/rima.v1i34.112
  16. Li, O. (2023). Artificial general intelligence and panentheism. Theology and Science, 21(2), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2023.2132583

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу


Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қол жетімді Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).