Process model of formation and development of technological sovereignty of the enterprise of production infrastructure

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Background. Technological sovereignty at industrial infrastructure enterprises level is particular important in strategic and critically industries. Because of systemic functional role of industrial infrastructure enterprises in ensuring technological maturity, sustainability and operational independence of the national economy in modern conditions. Despite the popularity of this concept, no unambiguous interpretation has been proposed. Its characteristics at the microlevel are also quite fragmentary.

Purpose is to development of formation and evolution tools of enterprise’s production infrastructure technological sovereignty, ensuring production efficiency and its growthing in strategically important and critically important industries.

Methodology in article general methods of scientific knowledge, including methods of comparison, analysis, synthesis and generalization, as well as graphical methods.

Results. A process process model has been developed based on the identified elements of technological sovereignty at the micro level. It allows to identify critical points in value chains and link them to reengineering tools, digital transformation, and industrial cooperation. The model demonstrates how an enterprise can integrate into the national system of technological development and reduce dependence on external factors, while strengthening its role in ensuring industry sustainability.

Practical implications the results obtained allow not only to visualize the key relationships between resources, technologies and strategic guidelines, but also to serve as the basis for formation organizational and economic instruments and programs for enterprise strategic development in context of ensuring technological sovereignty tasks at state and industry levels.

Авторлар туралы

Larisa Mamayeva

Branch of the National Research University «MEI» in Smolensk

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: no@sbmpei.ru

Postgraduate Student of the Department of Information Technologies in Economics and Management

 

Ресей, 1, Energetiky Passage, Smolensk, Smolensk region, 214013, Russian Federation

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Galimulina, F. F. (2022). Digital tools for industrial enterprise management in the context of strengthening technological sovereignty. Bulletin of the Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law, (4 (95)), 65–72.
  2. Gareev, T. R. (2023). Technological sovereignty: From conceptual contradictions to practical implementation. Terra Economicus, 21(4), 38–54.
  3. Dementyev, V. E. (2023). Technological sovereignty and priorities of production localization. Terra Economicus, 21(1), 6–18.
  4. Dementyev, V. E. (2024). Technological sovereignty and economic interests. Journal of Institutional Studies, 16(3), 6–18.
  5. Demidova, S. E. (2024). Factors of ensuring technological sovereignty. Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology, (2), 14–19.
  6. Dli, M. I., Zaenchkovsky, A. E., & Kakatunova, T. V. (2019). Prerequisites for using controlling to manage industrial clusters. Management of Economic Systems: Electronic Scientific Journal, (10 (128)), 14–17.
  7. Vedomosti. (2024). The share of oil and gas revenues in the budget is growing above plan in 2024. Retrieved from: https://www.vedomosti.ru/analytics/krupnyy_plan/articles/2024/10/30/1071779-dolya-neftegazovih-dohodov-byudzheta-2024-rastet-vishe-plana?ysclid=mdspi6yabo127277083 (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  8. Egorova, A. A., Danilov, I. A., & Dovbiy, I. P. (2022). Technological sovereignty: Retrospective analysis and prospects in conditions of increased economic volatility. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, (12 (470)). Economic Sciences, (79), 33–44.
  9. Karlova, N., Morozov, A., & Puzanova, E. (2023). Import restrictions constrain exports: Results of a business survey [Analytical note]. Retrieved from: https://cbr.ru/Content/Document/File/144420/analytic_note_20230130_dip.pdf (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  10. Kirillova, E. A. (2 Newton). Comparative analysis of key trends in interaction between science and education organizations and industrial enterprises. Management Sciences, 11(4), 86–98.
  11. Kirillova, E. A., & Zaenchkovsky, A. E. (2019). Model of integrating information logistics technologies for managing elements and processes at various levels of innovative environment functioning, with identification of logistics optimization contours. Journal of Legal and Economic Research, (2), 166–170.
  12. Kirillova, E. A., & Zaenchkovsky, A. E. (2024). System of criterion indicators for assessing changes among innovation process participants to ensure economic security at the meso level. Journal of Monetary Economics and Management, (7), 63–67.
  13. Kirillova, E. A., Puchkov, A. Yu., Minin, V. S., & Yartsev, D. D. (2024). Neuro-fuzzy model of resource provision for industrial enterprise innovation activities. Applied Informatics, 19(5 (113)), 126–142.
  14. Kotlyarov, I. D. (2015). Outsourcing model of organizing the Russian oil and gas industry: Problems and solutions. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (9), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-9-45-64. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UIKPJR
  15. Krotova, M. V. (2022). Potential of systems analysis methodology for developing a strategy to ensure Russia’s technological sovereignty. Russia: Trends and Development Prospects, (17-2), 104–108.
  16. Lukyanova, K. A., Polyakova, V. E., & Barykin, S. E. (2019). Domestic innovations as a path to import substitution in the oil and gas sector. In SPbPU Science Week: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade (Vol. 1, pp. 278–281). Saint Petersburg: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ATJLEE
  17. Kommersant. (2024). Oil and gas remain afloat. Retrieved from: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/7026070?ysclid=mdsp6m6s6f451783712 (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  18. Petrukhin, A. I. (2024). The role of industrial innovation infrastructure entities in ensuring Russia’s technological sovereignty. Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology, (3), 55–61.
  19. Federal State Statistics Service. GDP and GRP. Retrieved from: https://rosstat.gov.ru/statistics/accounts (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  20. Smelkova, A. V., Lyamin, B. M., & Konnikov, E. A. (2022). Risk categories of an oil-producing enterprise caused by resource constraints. Economic Sciences, (216), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.14451/1.216.101. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PUUKPE
  21. Sokolov, A. V. (2007). The method of critical technologies. Foresight, (1 (4)), 64–74.
  22. Suvorova, S. D., & Kulikova, O. M. (2022). Digital transformation of business. Innovative Economy: Prospects for Development and Improvement, (2 (60)), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.47581/2022/IE.2.60.10. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OVPLOP
  23. Sukharev, O. S. (2024). Russia’s technological sovereignty: Formation based on the development of the “knowledge economy” sector. Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, (1), 47–64.
  24. Faikov, D. Yu., & Baidarov, D. Yu. (2023). Toward technological sovereignty: Theoretical approaches, practice, and proposals. Economic Revival of Russia, (1 (75)), 67–82.
  25. Russian Federation. (2014). Federal Law “On Industrial Policy in the Russian Federation” No. 488-FZ of December 31, 2014. Retrieved from: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_173119/ (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  26. Shinkevich, A. I., & Shogenov, V. A. (2023). Some aspects of ensuring technological sovereignty of a research and production enterprise. Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 25(1 (111)), 23–27.
  27. Forbes. (2023). Experts assess the dependence of oil production on Western oilfield services companies. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.ru/biznes/485635-eksperty-ocenili-zavisimost-dobyci-nefti-ot-zapadnyh-nefteservisnyh-kompanij?ysclid=mdpvne5nkj490385069 (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  28. Okhrimenko, S. A., Silakov, A. V., Orlova, D. R., et al. (2024). Economic sanctions in the field of information technology. Moscow: A. N. Kosygin Russian State University (Technologies. Design. Art). ISBN 978-5-00181-656-0. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ULTVGW
  29. Russian Federation. (2017). Presidential Decree No. 208 of May 13, 2017 “On the Strategy for Economic Security of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2030”. Retrieved from: https://base.garant.ru/71672608/?ysclid=me3yvq62s0634308254 (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  30. Russian Federation. (2021). Presidential Decree No. 400 of July 2, 2021 “On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation”. Retrieved from: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_389271/ (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  31. Russian Federation. (2024). Presidential Decree No. 145 of February 28, 2024 “On the Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation”. Retrieved from: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/408518353/?ysclid=me3yv1t25k2834038 (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  32. Bauer, M., & Erixon, F. (2020). Europe’s quest for technology sovereignty: Opportunities and pitfalls (ECIPE Occasional Paper, No. 02/2020). Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/251089 (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  33. Crespi, F., Caravella, S., Menghini, M., & Salvatori, C. (2021). European technological sovereignty: An emerging framework for policy strategy. Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, 56(6), 348–354.
  34. Edler, J., Blind, K., Frietsch, R., Kimpeler, S., Kroll, H., Lerch, C., Reiss, T., Roth, F., Schubert, T., Schuler, J., & Walz, R. (2020). Technology sovereignty. From demand to concept. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research. Retrieved from: https://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/isi/dokumente/publikationen/technology_sovereignty.pdf (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  35. Ezeh, M. O., Ogbu, A. D., Ikevuje, A. H., & George, E. P. E. (2024). The role of business process analysis and re-engineering in enhancing energy sector efficiency. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 20(7), 393–404.
  36. Inoue, H., & Todo, Y. (2022). Propagation of overseas economic shocks through global supply chains: Firm-level evidence. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4183736 (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  37. Jia, Zh., Li, Y., Wang, J., Wang, Z., & Zhao, G. (2025). A study on the measurement of China’s manufacturing industry chain toughness and regional heterogeneity from a dynamic perspective. International Review of Economics & Finance, 102, 104329.
  38. Martynova, E., & Shcherbovich, A. (2024). Digital transformation in Russia: Turning from a service model to ensuring technological sovereignty. Computer Law & Security Review, 55, 106075.
  39. OECD. (2020). Shocks, risks and global value chains: Insights from the OECD METRO model. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/shocks-risks-and-global-value-chains_cc5f63d4-en.html (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  40. Shaw, N., Burgess, T. F., Mattos, C. De, & Stec, L. Z. (2005). Supply chain agility: The influence of industry culture on asset capabilities within capital-intensive industries. International Journal of Production Research, 43(16), 3497–3516. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500117805
  41. Kommersant. (2024). SLB does not abandon work. Retrieved from: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/6903608?ysclid=mdsozs6zk1964203824 (Accessed: August 9, 2025)
  42. Turoń, K. (2025). Modeling the implementation of open innovation in service ecosystems: A framework for shared mobility transformation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(3), 100592.
  43. Yang, W., Wen, J., Wang, F., & Liu, X. (2025). Trade dependency and technological specialization in the ICT supply chain: Structural dynamics and strategic autonomy in major economies. Telecommunications Policy, 103037.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу


Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қол жетімді Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).