Serous borderline ovarian tumors: modern possibilities of ultrasound diagnostics in monitoring the course of the disease after organ-preserving operations

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

Relevance. Borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) occur mainly in women of reproductive age and account for 20% of all neoplasms of the female genital organs. Currently, there is an increase in the incidence of ВОТ. One of the reasons for the increase in morbidity is the improvement of knowledge and experience in relation to the morphological diagnosis of tumors of low malignancy potential. Nevertheless, the results of a preliminary instrumental assessment of the nature of the disease and the final diagnosis formed by histological examination are not always satisfactory, since borderline tumors are a thin layer that occupies an intermediate position between benign and malignant tumors. And, in spite of the fact that ВОТ is an independent nosological form in the histological classification, nevertheless, they have signs of both benign and malignant neoplasms. In this regard, the complexity of both instrumental and morphological diagnostics of ВOT becomes understandable, and, therefore, difficulties arise in determining the tactics of treatment, choosing the optimal operation, and the need for drug therapy. All these issues are directly related to the patient’s quality of life, and, most importantly, to survival. Because an incorrectly established diagnosis entails incorrect treatment and unsatisfactory results. Thus, the study of the peculiarities of ВOT diagnostics is extremely important. The ultrasound computed tomography method is simple, relatively cheap and affordable. Considering that almost all patients with ovarian neoplasms undergo this type of examination, it is extremely important and interesting to assess the role of the ultrasound method in the diagnosis of ВОТ. Moreover, at present more and more gynecological oncologists are resorting to organ-preserving surgical interventions for ВOТ. Therefore, it is especially important to study the possibility of ultrasound diagnostics in monitoring the course of the disease after breast-conserving operations, identifying recurrences of the disease in the ovary, differentiating recurrence and cystic formations of the ovaries.

Aim. To determine the effectiveness of computer-assisted ultrasound diagnostics in monitoring the course of BOT after breast-conserving operations.

Materials and methods. At Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology carried out a retrospective and prospective analysis of 405 patients with serous BOT for the period 1970–2013. The age of the patients varied in a wide range, the minimum was 15, the maximum was 78 years, the median corresponded to 38 years. Before the start of treatment, the patients underwent an ultrasound examination (ultrasound) of the abdominal organs, the pelvic organs and the retroperitoneal space. The studies were carried out on expert ultrasonic systems Siemens ACUSON S2000, Hitachi ARIETTA V70 and Philips EPIQ 5.

Results. We studied the capabilities of the ultrasound method for diagnosing serous BOT based on the analysis of morpho-ultrasound comparisons in patients after conservative and ultra-conservative operations.

Conclusion. It has been established that ultrasound diagnostics is of decisive importance both in the initial diagnosis and in the dynamic observation of patients with conservative and ultra-conservative surgery for serous BOT. Echography makes it possible to diagnose a tumor in the ovary in 83.3% of cases and to reject the diagnosis in 86.7% of cases.

作者简介

Irina Davydova

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: davydova06@mail.ru

D. Sci. (Med.)

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Marina Chekalova

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies

Email: chekalova@mail.ru

D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Apollon Karseladze

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: karseladze54@bk.ru

D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Viktor Kuznetsov

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: davydova06@mail.ru

D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Liudmila Meshcheriakova

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: davydova06@mail.ru

D. Sci. (Med.)

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Tatiana Dedy

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies

Email: davydova06@mail.ru

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Moscow

Evgenii Cherkasov

Polyclinic №2 of the Medical and Sanitary Unit

Email: davydova06@mail.ru

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Alena Zharova

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: davydova06@mail.ru

Graduate Student

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Taylor HC. Malignant and semimalignant tumors of the ovary. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1929; 48: 204–30.
  2. Kurman RJ, Сarcanqiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH. WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs. Fourth Edition. Lyon: IARS, 2014; p. 307.
  3. Du Bois A, Trillsch F, Mahner S, et al. Management of borderline ovarian tumors. Ann Oncol 2016; 27 (Suppl. 1): i20–2. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw090
  4. Lodhi S, Najam S, Pervez S. DNA ploidy analysis of borderline epithelial ovarian tumours. J Pak Med Assoc 2000; 50 (10): 349–51.
  5. Scully RE, Young RH, Clement PB. Tumor like lesions. Tumors of the overy and maldeveloped gonads, fallopian tube and broad ligament. Washington: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1998; p. 443–4.
  6. Shih IM, Kurman RJ. Molecular pathogenesis of ovarian borderline tumors: new insights and old challenges. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11 (20): 7273–9.
  7. Shim SH, Kim SN, Jung PS, et al. Impact of surgical staging on prognosis in patients with borderline ovarian tumours: a meta-analysis. 2016; 54: 84–95.
  8. Acs G. Serous and mucinous borderline (low malignant potential) tumors of the ovary. Am J Clin Pathol 2005; 123 (Suppl.): 13–57.
  9. Lenhard MS, Mitterer S, Kümper C. Long-term follow-up after ovarian borderline tumor: relapse and survival in a large patient cohort. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 145: 189–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.04.031
  10. Seidman JD, Horkayne-Szakaly I, Haiba M. The histologic type and stage distribution of ovarian carcinomas of surface epithelial origin. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2004; 23: 41–4. doi: 10.1097/01.pgp.0000101080.35393.16
  11. Sherman ME, Mink PJ, Curtis R. Survival among women with borderline ovarian tumors and ovarian carcinoma: a population-based analysis. Cancer 2004; 100: 1045–52. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20080
  12. Ayhan A, Akarin R, Develioglu O, et al. Borderline epithelial ovarian tumors. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 31 (2): 174–6.
  13. Goldman TL, Chalas E, Chumas J, et al. Management of borderline tumors of the ovary. South Med J 1993; 86 (4): 423–5.
  14. Jimenez AM, Miralles Pi RM, Sanchez AE, et al. Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (borderline). A retrospective study of 31 cases. Eur J Gynaec Oncol 1994; 15 (4): 300–4.
  15. Jones MB. Borderline ovarian tumors: current concepts for prognostic factors and clinical management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49 (3): 517–25. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00011
  16. Lalwani N, Shanbhogue AK, Vikram R. Current update on borderline ovarian neoplasms. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (2): 330–6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3936
  17. Bostwick DG, Tazelaar HD, Ballon SC. Ovarian epithelial tumors of borderline malignancy: a clinical and pathologic study of 109 cases. Cancer 1983; 58: 2052–64. PMID: 3756820
  18. Leake JF, Currie JL, Rosenshein NB. Long-term follow-up of serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Gynecol Oncol 1992; 47: 150–8. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(92)90099-5
  19. Riman T, Dickman PW, Nilsson S. Risk factors for epithelial borderline ovarian tumors: results of a Swedish case – control study. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 83: 575–85. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6451
  20. Nikrui N. Survey of clinical behavior of patients with borderline tumors of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 1981; 12: 107–19. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(81)90102-5
  21. Green AE. Borderline ovarian cancer borderline tumor overview. Obstet Gynecol 2019.
  22. Exacoustos C, Romanini ME, Rinaldo D, et al. Preoperative sonographic features of borderline ovarian tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 50–9.
  23. Takemori M, Nishimura R, Hasegawa K. Clinical evaluation of MRI in the diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81 (2): 157–61. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810212.x
  24. Hassen K, Ghossain MA, Rousset P, et al. Characterization of papillary projections in benign versus borderline and malignant ovarian masses on conventional and color Doppler ultrasound. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 1444–9.
  25. Pascual MA, Tresserra F, Grases PJ, et al. Borderline cystic tumors of the ovary: gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound 2002; 30: 76–82.
  26. Sayasneh A, Ekechi C, Christine L, et al. The characteristic ultrasound features of specific types of ovarian pathology (Review). Int J Oncol 2015; 46 (2): 445–58.
  27. Давыдова И.Ю. Серозные пограничные опухоли яичников (клинико-морфологические особенности, лечение, прогноз). Дис. … д-ра мед. наук. М., 2018 [Davydova IIu. Seroznye pogranichnye opukholi iaichnikov (kliniko-morfologicheskie osobennosti, lechenie, prognoz). Dis. … d-ra med. nauk. Moscow, 2018 (in Russian)].

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Ultrasound image of the ovary. The ultrasound image showing the hyperechoic structures corresponding to the psammoma bodies along the outline of the normal sized ovary.

下载 (75KB)
3. Fig. 2. Transvaginal ultrasound. The color doppler imaging demonstrates the vascular pattern in the papillary growth pattern.

下载 (62KB)
4. Fig. 3. The application of transvaginal sonographic elastography. The ultrasound image showing the normal sized ovary. The structure of the ovary contains thin-walled cystic lesion with clear anechoic contents. A 0.4 cm thick papillary structures lesion along the cyst wall is visualized.

下载 (79KB)
5. Fig. 4. The formation of low-grade cancer against the background of serous borderline ovarian tumors, ×100.

下载 (89KB)
6. Fig. 5. Ultrasound ovarian tomography. The ultrasound image showing the normal sized ovary. The structure of the ovary contains thin-walled cystic lesion with clear anechoic contents and wall solid papillary growth pattern.

下载 (54KB)
7. Fig. 6. The beginning of the formation of cribriform structures on the papillae, ×200.

下载 (76KB)

版权所有 © Consilium Medicum, 2021

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。
 


##common.cookie##