Long-term results of surgical treatment of patients with retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

Relevance. Leiomyosarcomas is highly aggressive tumors with poor prognosis. Surgical resection is a standard treatment approach. However, data of long-term results of surgical treatment are lacking due to rarity of retroperitoneal form of leiomyosarcoma. Prognostic significance of tumor size, grade and recurrence type remains unclear as well.

Aim. To analyze results of surgical treatment of patients with retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma and to define prognostic factors which are associated with disease-free and overall survival.

Materials and methods. The study included patients with primary retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas who have received surgical or combined treatment between January 2003 and April 2019 at Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology. Short- and long-term clinical outcomes of surgical and combined treatment as well as recurrence rate, pattern of recurrence and morphological features were analyzed in order to define prognostic factors of disease-free and overall survival.

Results. The study included 64 patients with primary retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas – 12 men (18%) and 52 women (82%). Median tumor size was 10.5±5.0 cm. Most of the operations (93.3%) were done by open approach. Combined resections were performed in 62.5% of cases (n=40), vascular resections – in 17.2% cases (n=11). Radical (R0) resections were performed in 54 cases (85.9%). Postoperative morbidity and mortality rate were 39% and 0% respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy received 21 (35%) patients and 1 (1.7%) patient respectively. 46 (71.9%) patients had a disease recurrence. Recurrence type (local recurrence/distant metastases) did not influence overall survival (р=0.655). Median disease-free survival was 27 months (95% CI 10–43.9). 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival was 43% and 21% respectively. Median overall survival was 79 months (95% CI 49–108.9). 3-year and 5-year overall survival was 73% and 59% respectively. Among patients grade 2 and grade 3 tumors median disease-free survival was 49 vs. 18 months (р=0.271), median overall survival – 146 vs. 58 months (р=0.018). There were no statistically significant differences in rate of radical resections among patients with different tumor location (р=0.804) or its size (р=0,520). Patients, who have undergone radical (R0) resection, had better overall (р=0.028) and disease-free survival (р<0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated lower risk of disease recurrence (p=0.976), type of recurrence (р=0.981) and lower overall survival (р=0.284).

Conclusion. Tumor grade and radical resection are the most important prognostic factors in patients with retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma. In our study, tumor size was not correlated with long-term results and possibility of radical resection.

作者简介

Vladislav Bugaev

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vladbugaev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2410-7801
SPIN 代码: 7913-4919

Graduate Student

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Maxim Nikulin

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: maximpetrovich@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9608-4696
SPIN 代码: 9455-5566

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Sergey Nered

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Email: nered@mail.ru
SPIN 代码: 4588-3230

D. Sci. (Med.)

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Ludmila Lyubchenko

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: clingen@mail.ru
SPIN 代码: 9589-9057

D. Sci. (Med.)

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Ivan Stilidi

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: istilidi@front.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5229-8203
SPIN 代码: 9622-7106

Corr. Memb. RAS, D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Weiss SW. Smooth muscle tumors of soft tissue. Adv Anat Pathol 2002; 9 (6): 351–9.
  2. Tan MCB et al. Histology-based classification predicts pattern of recurrence and improves risk stratification in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. Ann Surg 2016; 263.
  3. Lehnert T et al. Primary and locally recurrent retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma: Local control and survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35.
  4. Gronchi A et al. Aggressive surgical policies in a retrospectively reviewed single-institution case series of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (1): 24–30.
  5. Bonvalot S et al. Aggressive surgery in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma carried out at high-volume centers is safe and is associated with improved local control. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17 (6).
  6. Gronchi A et al. Frontline extended surgery is associated with improved survival in retroperitoneal low-to intermediate-grade soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Oncol 2012; 23 (4): 1067–73.
  7. Strauss DC, Hayes AJ, Thomas JM. Retroperitoneal tumours: review of management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011; 93 (4): 275–80.
  8. Strauss DC et al. Surgical management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. Br J Surg 2010; 97 (5): 698–706.
  9. Stoeckle E et al. Prognostic factors in retroperitoneal sarcoma: A multivariate analysis of a series of 165 patients of the French Cancer Center Federation Sarcoma Group. Cancer 2001; 92 (2): 359–68.
  10. Klooster B et al. Is long-term survival possible after margin-positive resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS)? J Surg Oncol 2016.
  11. Цвиркун В.В. Диагностика и лечение забрюшинных неорганных опухолей. Дис. … д-ра мед. наук. М., 2001. [Tsvirkun V.V. Diagnostika i lechenie zabriushinnykh neorgannykh opukholei. Dis. … d-ra med. nauk. Moscow, 2001 (in Russian).]
  12. Mullinax JE, Zager JS, Gonzalez RJ. Current diagnosis and management of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Cancer Control 2011; 18 (3): 177–87.
  13. Ahlen J et al. Management of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: A Consensus Approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23: 3531–40.
  14. Стилиди И.С., Никулин М.П., Неред С.Н. и др. Комбинированные операции при забрюшинных липосаркомах. Хирургия. Журн. им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2013; 6: 20–5. [Stilidi I.S., Nikulin M.P., Nered S.N. et al. Kombinirovannye operatsii pri zabriushinnykh liposarkomakh. Khirurgiia. Zhurn. im. N.I. Pirogova. 2013; 6: 20–5. (in Russian).]
  15. Nathan H et al. Predictors of survival after resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma: A population-based analysis and critical appraisal of the AJCC Staging system. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 970–6.
  16. Li Q et al. Prognostic factors in patients with recurrent or metastatic retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma. Futur Oncol 2015; 11 (12): 1759–66.
  17. Mehren M Von et al. Soft tissue sarcoma, version 2.2018: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. JNCCN 2018; 6 (5): 536–63.
  18. Pervaiz N et al. A systematic meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft-tissue sarcoma. Cancer 2008; 113: 573–81.
  19. Le Cesne A et al. Doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma: Pooled analysis of two STBSG-EORTC phase III clinical trials. Ann Oncol 2014.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Consilium Medicum, 2019

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。
 


##common.cookie##