V-shaped radial forearm free flap is a new way to reduce the morbidity of the donor area

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. Radial forearm free flap is one of the most frequently used in the head and neck reconstruction. A significant disadvantage is the appearance of the donor site. We have developed and introduced into clinical practice a V-shaped fabrication skin of the flap, which allows “direct” closure of the donor site and reduces morbidity.

Aim. To assess the possibility of “direct” closure of the donor site and to reduce the morbidity of the donor site when performing the V-shaped fabrication of the skin area of the flap.

Materials and methods. During the period from 2014 to 2020, the radial free flap was used in 43 cases. In 15 (35%) cases, a V-shaped fabrication of the skin area was used during flap harvest, which made it possible to carry out a “direct” closure of the donor site. The length of the skin area stretched from the top of the wrist, not reaching 3–4 cm to the elbow bend and varied from 7–15 cm, on average – 12 cm. The width of the flap was determined by the elasticity of the forearm skin, was maximum in the middle third and varied from 2 up to 4 cm, averaging 3.3 cm. If necessary, the upper and lower edges of the skin area can be sutured together, as well as the entire medial edge of the flap. This technique increases the flap width by almost 2 times. This arrangement was applied in 8 cases.

Results. When comparing the results of using the two techniques, the following data were obtained: "V-shaped" fabrication of the skin was used mainly in women (11/15 – 73%) for reconstruction limited defects in the retromolar region (5/15), soft (4/15) or hard palate (6/15). Most of the patients had localized T1-T2 (10/15) stage. None of the patients had any problems with the healing of the donor area. An excellent aesthetic result was obtained in all patients. In the group of standard harvest, the predominance of males was noted (17/28). Defects had a varied localization, most patients was with relapses after chemo-radiation treatment (10/28) or primary locally advanced T3-T4 stage process (6/28) – 16, with a localized T1-T2 stage (11/28) – 11, in one case, delayed reconstruction was performed. In all cases, the plastic of the donor site was performed with a split skin autograft. Partial necrosis of the donor site flap was observed in 9 patients (32%), in 4 cases with exposure of the flexor muscle tendon.

Conclusion. As a result of the comparative analysis of the two methods, we concluded that the use of V-shaped fabrication of the skin area of the radial forearm flap allows to obtain better aesthetic results of the donor site, however, the use of this technique leads to a significant reduction in the length of the vascular pedicle and a decrease in the width of the flap.

About the authors

Mikhail V. Bolotin

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Author for correspondence.
Email: bolotin1980@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7534-6565
SPIN-code: 6105-5486

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Ali М. Mudunov

Clinical Hospital “Lapino”,

Email: bolotin1980@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1255-5700
SPIN-code: 3516-6616

D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.

Russian Federation, Moscow Region

Vasilii Yu. Sobolevsky

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: bolotin1980@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3668-0741

D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.

Russian Federation, Moscow

Azer А. Akhundov

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: bolotin1980@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9543-990X
SPIN-code: 8895-9447

D. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Igor М. Gelfand

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: bolotin1980@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4496-6128
SPIN-code: 7641-2039

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Sofio V. Sopromadze

Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: bolotin1980@mail.ru

oncologist

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Muhlbauer W, HerndI E, Stock W. The forearm flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;70(3):336-44.
  2. Boorman JG, Green MF. A split Chinese forearm flap for simultaneous oral lining and skin cover. Br J Plast Surg. 1986;39(2):179-82.
  3. Yang G, Chen B, Gao Y, et al. Forearm free skin flap transplantation. Natl Med J China. 1981;61:139-41.
  4. Song R, Gao Y, Song Y, et al. The forearm flap. Clin Plast Surg. 1982;9:21-6.
  5. Muhlbauer W, Olbrisch R.R, HerndI E, Stock W. Die Behandlung der Halskontraktur nach Verbrennung mit dem freien Unterarmlappen. Chirurg. 1981;52:635.
  6. Bardsley AF, Soutar DS, Elliot D, Batchelor AG. Reducing morbidity in the radial forearm flap donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(2):287-92;dis. 293-4.
  7. Hallock GG. Cutaneous cover for cutaneous coverage. Contemp Orthop. 1990;21:234.
  8. Masser MR. The preexpanded radial free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(2):295-301.
  9. Elliot D, Bardsley AF, Batchelor AG, Soutar DS. Direct closure of the radial forearm flap donor defect. Br J Plast Surg. 1988;41(4):358-60.
  10. Fenton OM, Roberts JO. Improving the donor site of the radial forearm flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1985;38(4):504-5.
  11. Timmons MJ, Missotten FE, Poole MD, Davies DM. Complications of radial forearm flap donor sites. Br J Plast Surg. 1986;39(2):176-8.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Mapping of the V-shaped radial facial cutaneous flap.

Download (96KB)
3. Fig. 2. The view of the V-shaped radial facial cutaneous flap after stitching the upper, lower and medial edges of the flap all together.

Download (149KB)
4. Fig. 3. Mapping of the area of the skin for skin graft using the "classic version".

Download (134KB)
5. Fig. 4. The view of the radial facial cutaneous flap after skin grafting using the «classic» version.

Download (115KB)
6. Fig. 5. The view of the donor area 2 weeks after the grafting V-shaped radial facial cutaneous flap.

Download (112KB)
7. Fig. 6. The view of the donor area 3 months after the grafting V-shaped radial facial cutaneous flap.

Download (109KB)
8. Fig. 7. The view of the donor area 3 weeks after plastic surgery using split-thickness skin autograft.

Download (122KB)
9. Fig. 8. The view of the donor area 6 months after plastic surgery using split-thickness skin autograft.

Download (86KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies