Experimental substantiation of the use of the navigation system in dental implantology


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article describes the anatomical experiment on the implants according to the classic method using dental navigation system. The experiment consisted of two parts: the implant according to standard methods without the use ofadditional devices and with the use of the navigation device, developed by the Department of maxillofacial surgery and dentistry of Samara state medical University. As a result the first part of the experiment it was found that the decrease of the review for the physician of the surgical field increases the angular difference between the axes of the implant and the abutment of the pin. In the second part of the anatomical experiment revealed a decline in the influence of human factors on the results of the installation of the implants with the use of dental navigation system. The study was valeno reduce the impact of human factors on the results of the implants using navigation technology.

About the authors

Aleksandr Valerievich Ivashchenko

state budgetary educational institution of higher professional education “Samara state medical University”

Email: ivachencoaveg@rambler.ru
department of oral and maxillofacial surgery and dentistry 443125, Samara, Russia

A. I Bayrikov

state budgetary educational institution of higher professional education “Samara state medical University”

department of prosthetic dentistry 443045, Samara, Russia

D. V Monakov

state budgetary educational institution of higher professional education “Samara state medical University”

department of oral and maxillofacial surgery and dentistry 443125, Samara, Russia

V. A Monakov

state budgetary educational institution of higher professional education “Samara state medical University”

department of oral and maxillofacial surgery and dentistry 443125, Samara, Russia

References

  1. Олесова В.Н., Перевезенцев А.П., Долидзе Т.Т. Биомеханическое обоснование несъемного протезирования с опорой на внутрикостные имплантаты при полном отсутствии зубов на нижней челюсти. Институт стоматологии. 1999; 12(5).
  2. Абдуллаев Ф.А. Клинико-экспериментальное обоснование метода непосредственной дентальной имплантации: Дисс.. д-ра мед. наук. М.; 2003.
  3. Арутюнов С.Д., Лебеденко И.Ю. Анализ распределения нагрузок и вероятности необратимых изменений в костных тканях челюсти при ортопедическом лечении с использованием дентальных внутрикостных имплантатов. Институт стоматолгии. 2002; 44(2):
  4. Жусев А.И., Ренов А.Ю. Дентальная имплантация, критерии успеха. М.: Центр дентальной имплантации; 2004.
  5. Marinello C., Soom U., Schaerer P. Parallel-A-Prep. Dentistry Today. 1991; 10(8):
  6. Ильин Д.В. Применение хирургических шаблонов в дентальной имплантации. Бюллетень медицинских Интернет-конференций. 2013; 3(3): 751.
  7. Brief J., Hassfeld S., Sonenfeld U., Persky N., Krempien R., Treiber M., Milhling J. Navigated onsertion of dental implants. In: ISRACAS Fourth Israeli Symposium on Computer Aided Surgery, Medical Robotics and Medical Imaging, Tel-Aviv, Israel. 2001, May 17. Tel’Aviv; 2001:
  8. Schermeier O. Ein Navigationssystem fur die dentale Implantology: PhD-Thesis. Technical University of Berlin; 2001.
  9. Смирнов А.Г. Вопросы разработки диагностической виртуальной модели зубочелюстной системы. Ученые записки Санкт-Петербургского государственного медицинского университета им. акад. И.П. Павлова. 2010; 4: 30-4.
  10. Смирнов А.Г. Компьютерное моделирование в стоматологии. Институт стоматологии. 2006; 1: 30.

Copyright (c) 2014 Eco-Vector


 


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies