Distant rehabilitation: the sources, current state-of-the-art, and further prospects


如何引用文章

全文:

详细

Medical rehabilitation is now a priority of the Russian Healthcare [Skvortsova V.I., 2012]. Rehabilitation centers are usually located in big cities and are not available for most patients. Therefore, one of the modern trends in the development of rehabilitation is a distantly controlled rehabilitation. We have developed a program of distant rehabilitation in Russia, based on our own achievements and experience of foreign colleagues. The article provides an overview of methods according to world literature studies. The survey shows that the problem of distant rehabilitation is relevant in our time, and requires additional clinical research and technological development.

作者简介

Pavel Snopkov

Federal state autonomous facility “Therapeutic and Rehabilitative Centre of the Russian Ministry of Health”

Email: snopkov@bk.ru
neurologist for the Department of Neurorehabilitation, Federal state autonomous facility “Therapeutic and Rehabilitative Centre of the Russian Ministry of Health” Moscow, Russia, 125367

K. Lyadov

Federal state autonomous facility “Therapeutic and Rehabilitative Centre of the Russian Ministry of Health”

Moscow, Russia, 125367

T. Shapovalenko

Federal state autonomous facility “Therapeutic and Rehabilitative Centre of the Russian Ministry of Health”

Moscow, Russia, 125367

I. Sidyakina

Federal state autonomous facility “Therapeutic and Rehabilitative Centre of the Russian Ministry of Health”

Moscow, Russia, 125367

参考

  1. ГОСТ Р ИСО/ТО 16056-1-2009. Информатизация здоровья. Функциональная совместимость систем и сетей телездравоохранения. М.: Стандартинформ, 2011.
  2. Стародубцева О.С., Бегичева С.В. Анализ заболеваемости инсультом с использованием информационных технологий. Фундаментальные исследования. 2012; (7): 424-7.
  3. Mark R.G. Telemedicine system: the missing link between homes and hospitals? Mod. Nurs. Home. 1974; 32 (2): 39-42.
  4. Zundel K.M. Telemedicine: history, applications and impact on librarianship. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 1996; 84 (1): 71-9.
  5. Bashur R., Lovett J. Assessment of telemedicine: results of the initial experience. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 1977; 48 (1): 65-70.
  6. Lai J.C., Woo J., Hui E., Chan W.M. Telerehabilitation - a new model for community-based stroke rehabilitation. J. Telemed. Telecare. 2004; 10: 199-205.
  7. Finkelstein J. et al. Home-based physical telerehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2008; 45 (9): 1361-73.
  8. Langan J. et al. Home-based telerehabilitation shows improved upper limb function in adults with chronic stroke: a pilot study. J. Rehabil. Med. 2013; 45 (2): 217-20.
  9. Tousignan M. et al. Tai Chi-based exercise program provided via telerehabilitation compared to home visits in a post-stroke population who have returned home without intensive rehabilitation: study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial. Trials. 2014; 15: 42 р.
  10. Hill A. J. et al. An Internet-based telerehabilitation system for the assessment of motor speech disorders: a pilot study. Am. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. 2006; 15 (1): 45-56.
  11. Hill A.J. et al. Using telerehabilitation to assess apraxia of speech in adults. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 2009; 44: 731-47.
  12. Theodoros D. et al. Assessing acquired language disorders in adults via the Internet. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2008; 14 (6): 552-9.
  13. Constantinescu G. et al. Assessing disordered speech and voice in Parkinson’s disease: a telerehabilitation application. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 2010; 45: 630-44.
  14. Hill A.J. et al. The re-design and re-evaluation of an internet-based telerehabilitation system for the assessment of dysarthria in adults. Telemed. J. E-Health. 2009; 15: 840-50.
  15. Schopp L.H., Johnstone B.R., Merveille O.C. Multidimensional telecare strategies for rural residents with brain injury. J. Telemed. Telecare. 2000; 6 (Suppl. 1): 146-9.
  16. Dromerick A.W., Edwards D.F, Diringer M.N. Sensitivity to changes in disability after stroke: comparison of four scales useful in clinical trials. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2003; 40: 1-8.
  17. Holden M.K., Dyar T.A., Dayan-Cimadoro L. Telerehabilitation using a virtual environment improves upper extremity function in patients with stroke. IEEE Trans. Neural. Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2007; 15 (1): 36-42.
  18. Kwan-Hwa Lin et al. Bidirectional and multi-user telerehabilitation system: clinical effect on balance, functional activity, and satisfaction in patients with chronic stroke living in long-term care facilities. Sensors. 2014; 14: 12451-66.
  19. O’Shea T.M. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cerebral palsy. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 51 (4): 816-28.
  20. Ortiz-Gutierrez R. et al. A telerehabilitation program improves postural control in multiple sclerosis patients: a spanish preliminary study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Hlth. 2013; 10; 5697-710.
  21. Cherney L.R., Kaye R.C., Hitch R.S. The best of both worlds: Combining synchronous and asynchronous telepractice in the treatment of aphasia. Perspect. Neurophysiol. Neurogen. Speech Lang. Disord. 2011; 21: 83-93.
  22. Sapir. S. et al. Speech loudness and quality 12 months after intensive voice treatment (LSVT) for Parkinson’s disease: a comparison with an alternative speech treatment. Folia Phoniatr. Logo. 2002; 54: 296-303.
  23. Linder S.M. et al. Incorporating robotic-assisted telerehabilitation in a home program to improve arm function following stroke: a case study. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 2013; 37 (3): 125-32.

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2016


 


##common.cookie##