Applying decision tree algorithms to early differential diagnosis between different clinical forms of acute Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Background: Tick-borne encephalitis and Lyme borreliosis are the most common natural focal infections in Russia often arising as a mixed infection, which is often clinically difficult to distinguish from a monoinfection at the onset of the disease that is a result of delayed laboratory verification of the diagnosis and it requires further searching for fundamentally new approaches to the issue of early differential diagnosis of tick-borne infections.
Aims: is to develop decision tree algorithms for early differential diagnosis between the mono- and mixed forms of acute Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis with prevailing febrile syndrome in clinical picture based on clinical and laboratory data.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 55 clinical and laboratory parameters obtained from 291 hospitalized tick-borne infections patients with or without erythema migrans at the site of ixodid tick bites in the first week of the disease, who were included in the single-center study from 2010 to 2023. In 211 patients without erythema, the analysis was carried out between three classes depending on the diagnosis: the mixed infection of non-erythematous Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis, the mono-infection of non-erythematous Lyme borreliosis or the monoinfection of tick-borne encephalitis. The other two classes, which included 80 patients with erythema, had the mixed infection of acute erythematous Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis or erythematous Lyme borreliosis monoinfection. Python programming language was applied to develop two decision tree models. Feature importance was assessed for all predictors. Each patient class was randomly divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) datasets. Accuracy evaluation of the models was based on ROC analysis.
Results: The decision tree algorithm for early differential diagnosis among the tick-borne infection patients without erythema migrans included the following most important predictors: maximal fever rise, chills, neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio, ESR, absolute number of reactive lymphocytes and immature granulocytes, and percentage of eosinophils. The model for differential diagnosis between the patients with erythema migrans included the following predictors: maximal fever rise, the absolute number of reactive lymphocytes and immature granulocytes, and the percentage of basophils. Both decision tree models showed excellent predictive values based on sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, and F1 scores, as well as areas under the ROC curve, which were higher than 0.90.
Conclusions: Based on clinical and laboratory parameters, two decision tree models with high sensitivity have been developed, which can be easily applied in clinical practice for early differential diagnosis of the tick-borne infections with prevailing fever syndrome.

作者简介

Ekaterina Ilyinskikh

Siberian State Medical University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: infconf2009@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7646-6905
SPIN 代码: 5245-5958
Scopus 作者 ID: 6602611268
Researcher ID: P-1653-2016

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor

俄罗斯联邦, 2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk

Evgenia Filatova

Siberian State Medical University

Email: synamber@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9951-8632
SPIN 代码: 8094-3417
Researcher ID: AEQ-2635-2022

MD

俄罗斯联邦, 2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk

Kirill Samoylov

Siberian State Medical University

Email: samoilov.krl@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8477-8551
SPIN 代码: 4710-0894
Researcher ID: HGC-9557-2022

MD

俄罗斯联邦, 2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk

Alina Semenova

Siberian State Medical University

Email: wind_of_change95@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5195-3897
SPIN 代码: 2690-1166
Researcher ID: ACK-7745-2022

MD

俄罗斯联邦, 2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk

Sergey Axyonov

Siberian State Medical University

Email: axyonov@tpu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1251-7133
SPIN 代码: 2229-4552
Scopus 作者 ID: 55543000900
Researcher ID: F-8210-2017

Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor

俄罗斯联邦, 2 Moskovsky trakt, 634050 Tomsk

参考

  1. Lobzin YuV, Uskov AN, Kozlov SS. Laim-borrelioz: iksodovye kleshchevye borreliozy. Saint Petersburg: Foliant; 2000. 156 p. (In Russ).
  2. Ierusalimsky AP. Kleshchevoi entsefalit: rukovodstvo dlya vrachei. Novosibirsk: Gosudarstvennaya meditsinskaya akademiya MZ RF; 2001. 360 p. (In Russ).
  3. Bondarenko AL, Zykova IV, Abbasova SV, Tikhomolova EG, Nekhoroshkina EL. Mixed infection of tick-borne encephalitis and ixodes tick-borne borrelioses. Infektsionnye Bolezni. 2011;9(4):54–63. (In Russ).
  4. Subbotin AV, Semenov VA, Etenko DA. Problema sovremennykh smeshannykh neiroinfektsii, peredayushchikhsya iksodovymi kleshchami. The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2012; (2(4)):35–39. (In Russ).
  5. Konkova-Reidman АB, Zlobin VI. Clinical polymorphism of ixodes tick-borne borrelioses (mixed infection with tick-borne encephalitis) on the territory of South-Ural region of Russia. Sibirskii meditsinskii zhurnal (Irkutsk). 2011;100(1):17–20. (In Russ).
  6. Minoranskaya NS, Minoranskaya EI. Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis mixed infection in Krasnoyarsk kray. Kazan Medical Journal. 2013; 94(2):211–215. (In Russ).
  7. Andronova NV, Minoranskaya NS, Minoranskaya EI. The specific immune response and some remote results in the acute course of tick-borne borreliosis and mixed-infection of tick-borne encephalitis and tick-borne borreliosis. Sibirskii meditsinskii zhurnal (Irkutsk). 2011;100(1):54–57. (In Russ).
  8. Tanner L, Schreiber M, Low JG, et al. Decision tree algorithms predict the diagnosis and outcome of dengue fever in the early phase of illness. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2(3):e196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000196
  9. Tamibmaniam J, Hussin N, Cheah WK, Ng KS, Muninathan P. Proposal of a clinical decision tree algorithm using factors associated with severe dengue infection. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0161696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161696
  10. Dobrijević D, Andrijević L, Antić J, Rakić G, Pastor K. Hemogram-based decision tree models for discriminating COVID-19 from RSV in infants. J Clin Lab Anal. 2023;37(6):e24862. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24862
  11. Kumaran M, Pham TM, Wang K, et al. Predicting the risk factors associated with severe outcomes among COVID-19 patients-decision tree modeling approach. Front Public Health. 2022;10:838514. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.838514
  12. Bruce P, Bruce A. Practical Statistics for Data Scientists. Saint Petersburg: BKhV-Peterburg; 2018. 304 p. (In Russ).
  13. Kowalska-Kępczyńska A, Mleczko M, Domerecka W, Krasowska D, Donica H. Assessment of immune cell activation in pemphigus. Cells. 2022;11(12):1912. doi: 10.3390/cells11121912
  14. Grebennikova IV, Lidokhova OV, Makeeva AV, et al. Age-depended changes of leukocyte indices in COVID-19. Naučno-medicinskij vestnik Central’nogo Černozem’â. 2022;(87): 9–15. (In Russ).
  15. Petrie A, Sabin K. Medical statistics at a glance. Leonov VP, editor. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2015. 216 p. (In Russ).
  16. Huang Y, Li S, Lin B, et al. Early detection of college students’ psychological problems based on decision tree model. Front Psychol. 2022;13:946998. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946998
  17. Mukhopadhyay S. Advanced data analytics using Python: with machine learning, deep learning and NLP examples. Kolkata : Apress Berkeley; 2018. 186 p. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4842-3450-1
  18. Kalafi EY, Nor NAM, Taib NA, et al. Machine learning and deep learning approaches in breast cancer survival prediction using clinical data. Folia Biol (Praha). 2019;65(5-6):212–220.
  19. Lakshmanan V, Sara Robinson S, Munn M. Machine learning. Design patterns. Saint Petersburg: BKhV-Peterburg; 2022. 448 p. (In Russ).
  20. Turk SP, Lumbard K, Liepshutz K, et al. Post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms score: Developing a new tool for research. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225012
  21. Minoranskaya NS, Uskov AN, Sarap PV. Importance of immune status for prognosis chronic borreliosis infections. Jurnal infektologii. 2014;6(1): 35–40. (In Russ).
  22. Suzdaltcev AA, Karavashkin NV, Kulagina AP. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of ixodic tick-borne borreliosis in the Samara region. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2021;16(3(93)):27–32. (In Russ).
  23. Bondarenko AL, Sapozhnikova VV. Analysis of clinical-epidemiological, laboratory parameters and cytokine status in patients with erythematous and non-erythematous forms of ixodes tick borreliosis. Infektsionnye Bolezni. 2018;16(2):34–42. (In Russ). doi: 10.20953/1729-9225-2018-2-34-42
  24. Blom K, Cuapio A, Sandberg JT, et al. Cell-mediated immune responses and immunopathogenesis of human tick-borne encephalitis virus-infection. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2174. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02174
  25. Rutkowska E, Kwiecień I, Kulik K, et al. Usefulness of the new hematological parameter: reactive lymphocytes RE-LYMP with flow cytometry markers of inflammation in COVID-19. Cells. 2021;10(1):82. doi: 10.3390/cells10010082
  26. Georgakopoulou VE, Makrodimitri S, Triantafyllou M, et al. Immature granulocytes: Innovative biomarker for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mol Med Rep. 2022;26(1):217. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12733
  27. Rizo-Téllez SA, Méndez-García LA, Flores-Rebollo C, et al. The neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio and lymphocyte-to-neutrophil ratio at admission predict in-hospital mortality in Mexican patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19). Microorganisms. 2020;8(10):1560. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8101560
  28. Oehadian A, Michels M, de Mast Q, et al. New parameters available on Sysmex XE-5000 hematology analyzers contribute to differentiating dengue from leptospirosis and enteric fever. Int J Lab Hematol. 2015;37(6):861–868. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12422

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Decision tree model for early clinical differential diagnosis between the following three classes of patients without erythema migrans at the site of ixodid tick bite: the mixed infection of Lyme borreliosis non-erythematous form and tick-borne encephalitis, the monoinfection of Lyme borreliosis non-erythematous form or the monoinfection of tick-borne encephalitis: ИКБ — monoinfection of Lyme borreliosis; КЭ — monoinfection of tick-borne encephalitis; СИ — mixed infection of Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis; ИСНМ — neutrophil-monocyte ratio, units; СОЭ — erythrocyte sedimentation rate, mm/h; EO — number of eosinophils, %; RE-LYMP — absolute number of reactive lymphocytes, ×109/l; IG — absolute number of immature granulocytes, ×109/l.

下载 (808KB)
3. Fig. 2. Decision tree model for early clinical differential diagnosis between the following two classes of patients with erythema migrans at the site of ixodid tick bite: the mixed infection of Lyme borreliosis erythematous form and tick-borne encephalitis or the monoinfection of Lyme borreliosis erythematous form: BASO — number of basophils, %; IG — absolute number of immature granulocytes, ×109/l; RE-LYMP — absolute number of reactive lymphocytes, ×109/l.

下载 (611KB)

版权所有 © Eco-vector, 2023


 


##common.cookie##