Formation of Side Ledge and Bottom Ledge in an Aluminum Electrolyzer


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The dynamic behavior (formation/dissolution) of the ledge, depending on the electrolyte overheating temperature, thermal resistance of the lining material, and composite of the cryolite–alumina electrolyte, is studied experimentally using a model installation mimicking the actual conditions of the electrolytic aluminum production. A window that enabled the change of the lining material is mounted into the front wall of the installation case. The ledge formation occurs due to a heat flow formed due to the temperature difference of the electrolyte and electrolyzer walls. The electrolyte cryolite ratio (CR) is varied in a range of 2.1–2.5. The alumina concentration in the electrolyte does not exceed 4.5 wt %. The change in the shape of the working space in the electrolyzer during the electrolysis is determined by the ledge thickness. The active ledge formation in the experimental cell starts upon overheating by 3–4 K. It is shown that a thicker ledge is formed at the same overheating temperature with a decrease in the thermal resistance of the lining material from 16 to 14 m2/W, but a decrease in the thermal resistance in the already formed ledge almost does not affect its thickness. Similarly to the industrial electrolyzer, the ledge profile formed in the experimental cell can be conditionally divided into three zones, notably, bottom ledge, ledge at the metal/electrode interface, and side ledge. The dynamic behavior of the side ledge differs from the bottom ledge; notably, the side ledge is thicker at a high electrolyte CR, while the bottom ledge is thinner. The chemical analysis of components in the dry knock out shows that the CR and Al2O3 concentrations increase over the cell height from top to bottom. It is concluded that the side ledge has a heterogeneous composition that depends on the electrolyte composition and cooling rate.

Sobre autores

A. Ivanova

Scientific-and-Technical Center “Elter”

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: eletrk@yandex.ru
Rússia, Krasnoyarsk, 660025

P. Arkhipov

Institute of High-Temperature Electrochemistry, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: arh@ihte.uran.ru
Rússia, Yekaterinburg, 620219

A. Rudenko

Institute of High-Temperature Electrochemistry, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: a.rudenko@ihte.uran.ru
Rússia, Yekaterinburg, 620219

O. Tkacheva

Institute of High-Temperature Electrochemistry, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences; Ural Federal University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: o.tkacheva@ihte.uran.ru
Rússia, Yekaterinburg, 620219; Yekaterinburg, 620002

Yu. Zaikov

Ural Federal University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: zikov@ihte.uran.ru
Rússia, Yekaterinburg, 620002

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Allerton Press, Inc., 2019