The Andreev conductance in superconductor–insulator–normal metal structures

The Andreev subgap conductance at 0.08–0.2 K in thin-film superconductor (aluminum)–insulator–normal metal (copper, hafnium, or aluminum with iron-sublayer-suppressed superconductivity) structures is studied. The measurements are performed in a magnetic field oriented either along the normal or in the plane of the structure. The dc current–voltage (I–U) characteristics of samples are described using a sum of the Andreev subgap current dominating in the absence of the field at bias voltages U < (0.2–0.4)Δ_c/e (where Δ_c is the energy gap of the superconductor) and the single-carrier tunneling current that predominates at large voltages. To within the measurement accuracy of 1–2%, the Andreev current corresponds to the formula \({I_n} + {I_s} = {K_n}\tanh \left( {{{eU} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{eU} {2k{T_{eff}}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {2k{T_{eff}}}}} \right) + {K_s}{{\left( {{{eU} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{eU} {{\Delta _c}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\Delta _c}}}} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {{{eU} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{eU} {{\Delta _c}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\Delta _c}}}} \right)} {\sqrt {1 - {{eU} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{eU} {{\Delta _c}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\Delta _c}}}} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\sqrt {1 - {{eU} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{eU} {{\Delta _c}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\Delta _c}}}} }}\) following from a theory that takes into account mesoscopic phenomena with properly selected effective temperature T_eff and the temperature- and fieldindependent parameters K_n and K_s (characterizing the diffusion of electrons in the normal metal and superconductor, respectively). The experimental value of K_n agrees in order of magnitude with the theoretical prediction, while K_s is several dozen times larger than the theoretical value. The values of T_eff in the absence of the field for the structures with copper and hafnium are close to the sample temperature, while the value for aluminum with an iron sublayer is several times greater than this temperature. For the structure with copper at T = 0.08–0.1 K in the magnetic field B_|| = 200–300 G oriented in the plane of the sample, the effective temperature T_eff increases to 0.4 K, while that in the perpendicular (normal) field B_⊥ ≈ 30 G increases to 0.17 K. In large fields, the Andreev conductance cannot be reliably recognized against the background of single- carrier tunneling current. In the structures with hafnium and in those with aluminum on an iron sublayer, the influence of the magnetic field is not observed.