Periodontal biotype: anatomic features and association with surrounding tissue

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The high prevalence of periodontal diseases, up to 90%, is an important issue in medicine. The periodontal biotype is one of the most important parameters that determine the course and prognosis of periodontal diseases. Gingival thickness, keratinized tissue, and bone morphology are the main characteristics of the periodontal biotype. This article presents a review of the literature on the characteristics of periodontal biotypes, their response to treatment, and treatment prognosis. A search of electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, CyberLeninka, Elibrary, and RINC) was performed for the literature review. The article also presents studies about relationships among periodontal biotype, recession, and malocclusion. The thin biotype is a predictive factor of gingival recession. Recessions are characterized by apical migration of marginal gingiva and defects in root coverage. Gingival recession may result from orthodontic movement of teeth, particularly among patients with the thin gingival biotype. The thin and thick biotypes respond differently to inflammation, restorative and surgical effects, and parafunctional habits. A gingival thickness greater than 2 mm can be categorized as the thick biotype and less than 1,5 mm as the thin biotype. Gingival thickness can affect the results of restorative therapy and root coverage procedures. It is necessary to determine the gingival biotype before initiating treatment. Special care must be taken when planning treatment for cases with a thin biotype.

作者简介

I. Kopetskiy

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: ludmila-stomatolog@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4723-6067

MD, PhD, DSc, Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

L. Pobozhieva

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: ludmila-stomatolog@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6150-0282

MD, PhD

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Yu. Shevelyuk

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow Medicine State University

Email: ulija.med5@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3854-456X

MD, PhD

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

A. Kopetskaya

A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State Medical-Dentistry University

Email: alyonasom@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3199-5314
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Grudyanov A.I. Periodontal Diseases. [Zabolevaniya Parodonta]. Moscow: MIA; 2009. (in Russian)
  2. Dhalkari C., Ganatra P. Role of gingival tissue biotype in periodontal management. IOSR Journal of dental and medical sciences. 2014; 13(11): 54-7. doi: 10.9790/0853-131145457.
  3. Alves P.H.M., Alves T.C.L.P., Pegoraro T.A., Costa Y.M., Bonfante E.A., de Almeida A.L.P.F. Measurement properties of gingival biotype evaluation methods. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20(3): 280-4. doi: 10.1111/cid.12583.
  4. Fischer K.R., Künzlberger A., Donos N., Fickl S., Friedmann A. Gingival biotype revisited-novel classification and assessment tool. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22(1): 443-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2131-1.
  5. Zweers J., Thomas R.Z., Slot D.E., Weisgold A.S., Van der Weijden F.G. Characteristics of periodontal biotype, its dimensions, associations and prevalence: a systematic review. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2014; 41(10): 958-71. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12275.
  6. Kolte R., Kolte A., Mahajan A. Assessment of gingival thickness with regards to age, gender and arch location. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014; 18(4): 478-81. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.138699.
  7. Bhatt V., Shetty S. Prevalence of different gingival biotypes in individuals with varying forms of maxillary central incisors: a survey. J Dent Implant. 2013; 3(2): 116. doi: 10.4103/0974-6781.118888.
  8. Fu J.H., Yen C.Y., Chan H.L., Tatarakis N., Leong D.T., Wang H.L. Tissue biotype& its relation to the underlying bone morphology. J Periodontal. 2010; 81(4): 569-74. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090591.
  9. Kois J.C. Predictable single tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2001; 22(3): 199-206.
  10. Kois J.C. Altering gingival levels: The restorative connection, part I: Biological variables. J Esthet Restor Dent. 1994; 6(1): 3-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1994.tb00825.x.
  11. Makeeva I.M., Erokhin A.I., Gavryushova L.V. Thin biotype of the periodontium: an evolutionary rationale for the revision of the traditional protocols of dental procedures. Farmateka. 2013; (S4): 47-51. (in Russian)
  12. Palkovics D., Gera I. The significance of biotype in the predictability of dental-periodontal treatment. Fogorv Sz. 2016; 109(2): 45-55.
  13. Cuny-Houchmand M., Renaudin S., Leroul M., Planche L., Guehennec L.L., Soueidan A. Gingival biotype assessement: visual inspection relevance and maxillary versus mandibular comparison. Open Dent J. 2013; 7: 1-6. doi: 10.2174/1874210601307010001.
  14. Jati A.S., Furquim L.Z., Consolaro A. Gingival recession: Its causes and types, and the importance of orthodontic treatment. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016; 21(3): 18-29. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.3.018-029.oin.
  15. Esfahrood Z.R., Kadkhodazadeh M., Talebi-Ardakani M.R. Gingival biotype: a review. Gen Dent. 2013; 61(4): 14-7.
  16. Pontoriero R., Carnevale G. Surgical crown lengthening: a 12-month clinical wound healing study. J. Periodontol. 2001; 72(7): 841-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.7.841.
  17. Huang L.H., Neiva R.E., Wang H.L. Factors affecting the outcomes of coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure. J. Periodontol. 2005; 76(10): 1729-34. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1729.
  18. Tal H., Moses O., Zohar R., Meir H., Nemcovsky C. Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: a comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts. J. Periodontol. 2002; 73(12): 1405-11. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.12.1405.
  19. Hwang D., Wang H.L. Flap thickness as a predictor of root coverage: a systematic review. J. Periodontol. 2006; 77(10): 1625-34. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.060107.
  20. Kao R.T., Pasquinelli K. Thick vs. thin gingival tissue: a key determinant in tissue response to disease and restorative treatment. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2002; 30(7): 521-6.
  21. Müller H.P., Könönen E. Variance components of gingival thickness. J. Periodontal. Res. 2005; 40(3): 239-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00798.x.
  22. Mamedov A.A., Kharke V.V., Sedel’nikova V.V. Planning of orthodontic treatment of patients with a thin periodontal biotype. Russian journal of stomatology. 2016; 9(1): 74-5. (in Russian)
  23. Arsenina O.I., Grudyanov A.I., Karpanova A.S. Clinical and radiological characteristics of patients with anomalies in the position of the teeth and a thin gingiva biotype. Ortodontiya. 2017; (3): 47-8. (in Russian)
  24. Matarese G., Isola G., Ramaglia L., Dalessandri D., Lucchese A., Alibrandi A. et al. Periodontal biotype: characteristic, prevalence and dimensions related to dental malocclusion. Minerva Stomatol. 2016; 65(4): 231-8.
  25. Assiri M., Shafik S., Tawfig A. Association between gingival tissue biotype and different facial phenotypes. Saudi Dent J. 2019; 31(4): 476-80. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.04.002.
  26. Kois J.C. Predictable single-tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004; 25(11): 895-900.
  27. Zigdon H., Machtei E.E. The dimensions of keratinized mucosa around implants affect clinical and immunological parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19(4): 387-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01492.x.
  28. Evans C.D., Chen S.T. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19(1):73-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01413.x.
  29. Kao R.T., Fagan M.C., Conte G.J. Thick vs. thin gingival biotypes: a key determinant in treatment planning for dental implants. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2008; 36(3): 193-8.
  30. Aimetti M., Massei G., Morra M., Cardesi E., Romano F. Correlation between gingival phenotype and Schneiderian membrane thickness. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23(6): 1128-32.
  31. Kan J.Y., Morimoto T., Rungcharassaeng K., Roe P., Smith D.H. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2020


 


##common.cookie##