On Uncertainty Analysis in the Calibration of Gauge Block: Another Look at Example S4 from EA-4/02


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

We present application of three alternative approaches for solving the Example S4 from EA-4/02 (Calibration of a gauge block of nominal length 50 mm); see [4]. As a result, application of the alternative approaches validates usage of the standard GUM uncertainty framework; see [1]. In particular, we consider the following alternative approaches to obtain the expanded uncertainty of measurement and/or the proper coverage interval for the measurand, namely (i) GUF (GUM uncertainty framework) based on using the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement [1], (ii) MCM (Monte Carlo method) based on using Supplement 1 to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement – propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo (MC) method [2], and (iii) CFA (characteristic function approach) based on using the inverted characteristic function of the optimal linear estimator of the measurand [5]. Application of the methods (i), (ii), and (iii) is illustrated by uncertainty analysis of a well-known dataset, and the results are compared. Some useful mathematical results concerning probability density functions (pdf) and characteristic functions (cf) are given in the Appendix.

作者简介

G. Wimmer

Mathematical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences; Faculty of Science, Matej Bel University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: wimmer@mat.savba.sk
斯洛伐克, Bratislava; Banská Bystrica

V. Witkovský

Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Email: wimmer@mat.savba.sk
斯洛伐克, Bratislava


版权所有 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature, 2019
##common.cookie##