Synthesis, Ionic, and Phase Compositions of Ferrogarnet Y2.5Ce0.5Fe2.5Ga2.5O12

Yu. A. Teterin; Тетерин Ю. А.; M. N. Smirnova; Смирнова М. Н.; K. I. Maslakov; Маслаков К. И.; A. Yu. Teterin; Тетерин А. Ю.; G. E. Nikiforova; Никифорова Г. Е.; Ya. S. Glazkova; Глазкова Я. С.; A. N. Sobolev; Соболев А. Н.; I. A. Presnyakov; Пресняков И. А.; V. A. Ketsko; Кецко В. А.

doi:10.31857/S0044457X23600135

Synthesis, Ionic, and Phase Compositions of Ferrogarnet Y2.5Ce0.5Fe2.5Ga2.5O12

Authors: Teterin Y.A.¹^,2, Smirnova M.N.³, Maslakov K.I.¹, Teterin A.Y.⁴, Nikiforova G.E.³, Glazkova Y.S.¹, Sobolev A.N.¹, Presnyakov I.A.¹, Ketsko V.A.³
Affiliations:
1. Moscow State University
2. National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”
3. Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
4. National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute,”
Issue: Vol 68, No 7 (2023)
Pages: 904-912
Section: СИНТЕЗ И СВОЙСТВА НЕОРГАНИЧЕСКИХ СОЕДИНЕНИЙ
URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0044-457X/article/view/136359
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X23600135
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RIJBOI
ID: 136359

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

X-ray powder diffraction, X-ray photoelectron, and Mössbauer spectroscopy are used to study the ionic and phase compositions of samples of powdered ferrogarnet Y2.5Ce0.5Fe2.5Ga2.5O12 obtained by gel combustion followed by crystallization in vacuum and additional annealing in air at 750°С. According to X-ray photoelectron and Mössbauer spectroscopy data, the iron and cerium cations in the homogeneous ferrogarnet structure are stabilized in the formal oxidation state Fe3+. At the same time, along with Ce3+, the surface of Y2.5Ce0.5Fe2.5Ga2.5O12 particles contains Ce4+ ions. The results obtained can be used to create functional materials for a new generation of magnetooptical devices.

Keywords

Ce-YIG ferrogarnet, X-ray powder diffraction, XPS, Mössbauer spectroscopy

References

Garskaite E., Gibson K., Leleckaite A. et al. // Chem. Phys. 2006. V. 323. P. 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.08.055
Park M.B., Cho N.H. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2001. V. 231. P. 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(01)00068-3
Onbasli M.C., Goto T., Sun X. et al. // Opt. Express. 2014. V. 22. P. 25183. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.025183
Рандошкин В.В., Червоненкис А.Я. Прикладная магнитооптика. М.: Энергоатомиздат, 1990. 320 с.
Shen T., Dai H., Song M. // J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2017. V. 30. P. 937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-016-3880-9
Huang M., Zhang S. // Appl. Phys. A. 2022. V. 74. P. 177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003390100883
Ibrahim N.B., Edwards C., Palmer S.B. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2000. V. 220. P. 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(00)00331-0
Dastjerdi O.D., Shokrollahi H., Yang H. // Ceramics Int. 2020. V. 46 (315). P. 2709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.261
Xu H., Yang H. // J. Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 2008. V. 19. P. 589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-007-9394-2
Shannon R.D. // Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A. 1976. V. 32. P. 751. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567739476001551
Gilleo M.A., Geller S. // Phys. Rev. 1958. V. 110. Issue 1. P. 73. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.110.73
Lisnevskaya I.V., Bobrova I.A., Lupeiko T.G. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016. V. 397. P. 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.08.084
Smirnova M.N., Nikiforova G.E., Goeva L.V. // Ceramics Int. 2018. V. 45 (4). P. 4509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.11.133
Smirnova M.N., Glazkova I.S., Nikiforova G.E. et al. // Nanosystems: Phys. Chem. Mathem. 2021. V. 12. P. 210. https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2021-12-2-210-217
Teterin Yu.A., Smirnova M.N., Maslakov K.I. et al. // Dokl. Phys. Chem. 2022. V. 503. Part 2. P. 45. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012501622040029
Смирнова М.Н., Гоева Л.В., Симоненко Н.П. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2016. Т. 61. С. 1354. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023616100193
Смирнова М.Н., Копьева М.А., Береснев Э.Н. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2018. Т. 63. С. 411. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023618040198
Shirley D. // Phys. Rev. B. 1972. V. 5. P. 4709. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.5.4709
Панов А.Д. Пакет программ обработки спектров SPRO и язык программирования. М.: Ин-т атом. энергии, 1997. 31 с.
Matsnev M.E., Rusakov V.S. // AIP Conf. Proc. 2012. V. 1489. P. 178.
Maslakov K.I., Teterin Yu.A., Popel A.J. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018. V. 448. P. 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.077
Maslakov K.I., Teterin Yu.A., Ryzhkov M.V. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018. V. 20. P. 16167. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024421060212
Teterin Yu.A., Teterin A.Yu. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2002. V. 717. № 5. P. 347. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2002v071n05ABEH00071
Sawatzky G.A., van der Woude F., Morrish A.H. // Phys. Rev. 1969. V. 183. P. 383.
Belogurov V.N., Bilinkin V. // Phys. Status Solid. (A). 1981. V. 63. P. 45.