Email this article Specific Features of the Retention of Lutein Diesters on C16 Stationary Phases with Different Pore Diameters
- Authors: Deineka V.I.1, Staroverov S.M.2,3, Vasiyarov G.G.3, Burzhinskaya T.G.1, Blinova I.P.1
-
Affiliations:
- Belgorod State National Research University
- Moscow State University
- AO BioKhimMak ST
- Issue: Vol 97, No 8 (2023)
- Pages: 1192-1195
- Section: ФИЗИЧЕСКАЯ ХИМИЯ ПРОЦЕССОВ РАЗДЕЛЕНИЯ. ХРОМАТОГРАФИЯ
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0044-4537/article/view/136673
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044453723080034
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QTRNXE
- ID: 136673
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
It is shown that the column dead time determined from the retention of uracil is longer than the one determined from the retention of homologs—lutein diesters—for C16 reversed phases on three columns with sorbents with different pore diameters (80, 110, and 160 Å). This finding confirms the familiar assumption that the sorbate molecules 10% larger than the pore diameter can cause problems with the retention of the sorbate. It is found for smaller molecules (of alkyl benzoates) that the dead time determined from the retention of uracil is less than the one determined from the retention of the homologs on the same stationary phases, confirming that the main cause of the observed effect is the size factor.
About the authors
V. I. Deineka
Belgorod State National Research University
Email: deineka@bsu.edu.ru
308015, Belgorod, Russia
S. M. Staroverov
Moscow State University; AO BioKhimMak ST
Email: deineka@bsu.edu.ru
119991, Moscow, Russia; 119234, Moscow, Russia
G. G. Vasiyarov
AO BioKhimMak ST
Email: deineka@bsu.edu.ru
119234, Moscow, Russia
T. G. Burzhinskaya
Belgorod State National Research University
Email: deineka@bsu.edu.ru
308015, Belgorod, Russia
I. P. Blinova
Belgorod State National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: deineka@bsu.edu.ru
308015, Belgorod, Russia
References
- Verzele M., Mussche P. // J. Chromatogr. 1983. V. 254. P. 117.
- Kimata K., Iwaguchi K., Onishi S. et al. // J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1989. V. 27. P. 721.
- Walters M.J. // J. Assoc. Anal. Chem. 1987. V. 70. P. 465.
- Godinho J.M., Naese J.A., Toler A.E. et al. // J. Chromatogr. A. 2020. V. 1634. 461678.
- Žuvela P., Skoczylas M., Liu J.J. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2019. V. 119. P. 3674.
- Lesellier E., West C., Tchapla A. // J. Chromat. A. 2006. V. 1111. P. 62.
- Ligor M., Kováčova J., Gadzała‑Kopciuch R.M. et al. // Chromatogr. 2014. V. 77. P. 1047.
- Дейнека В.И., Староверов С.М., Васияров Г.Г. и др. // Сорбционные и хроматографические процессы. 2021. Т. 21. № 6. С. 819.
- Schuster S.A., Henry R.A. // LCGC North America. 2018. V. 36. P. 134.
- Zdravkov B.D., Čermák J.J., Šefara M. et al. // Central Eur. J. Chem. 2007. V. 5. P. 385.
- Horvat G., Pantić M., Knez Ž. et al. // Gels. 2022. V. 8. P. 438.
- Kaneko K. // J. Membrane Sci. 1994. V. 96. P. 59.
- Дейнека В.И., Дейнека Л.А., Сидоров А.Н. и др. // Физикохимия поверхности и защита материалов 2017. Т. 53. С. 262.
- Дейнека В.И., БуржинскаяТ.Г., Дейнека Л.А. // Сорбционные и хроматографические процессы. 2022. Т. 22. № 4. С. 393.
- Лапшова М.С., Дейнека В.И., Дейнека Л.А. и др. // Журн. аналит. химии. 2013. Т. 68. С. 1130.
