Role of electron-beam tomography in diagnosis of patency of aortocoronary and mammarocoronary bypasses (by 3-year follow-up data)
- 作者: Veselova T1, Sinitsyn V1, Fedotenkov I1, Vasilyev V1, Shiryaev A1, Ternovoi S1
-
隶属关系:
- Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава РФ
- 期: 卷 78, 编号 4 (2003)
- 页面: 15-19
- 栏目: Editorial
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0040-3660/article/view/29333
- ID: 29333
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
Material and methods. 36 patients with coronary heart disease entered the study. All the patients have undergone coronary artery bypass operation and/or mammarocoronary bypass operation (CABO and MCBO, respectively). For three years after the surgery the patients were annually examined with EBT-shuntography. The contrast agent was injected intravenously in a dose 135-140 ml with the injection rate 3.5-4.0 ml/s. In addition to EBT-shuntography, selective x-ray contrast shuntography was conducted one year after CABO.
Results. By a comparative analysis, EBT sensitivity and specificity in examination of autovenous shunts patency is 100%, in assessment of patency of mammary shunts is 93 and 100%, respectively. The 3-year retrospective analysis has revealed occlusions in 17.1% venous shunts and 2.7% arterial ones in the first year after CABO and MCBO, 5.2 and 2.8% in the second year, respectively, and in 1.8% venous shunts in the third year.
Conclusion. EBT-shuntography is a highly informative non-invasive method of diagnosis of aortocoronary shunts patency.
作者简介
T Veselova
Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава РФМосква; Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава РФ
V Sinitsyn
Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава РФМосква; Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава РФ
I Fedotenkov
Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава РФМосква; Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава РФ
V Vasilyev
Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава РФМосква; Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава РФ
A Shiryaev
Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава РФМосква; Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава РФ
S Ternovoi
Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава РФМосква; Российский кардиологический научно-производственный комплекс Минздрава РФ
参考
- Терновой С. К., Синицын В. Е. Спиральная компьютерная и электронно-лучевая ангиография. М.: Видар; 1998.
- Boyd D. P., Upton V. J. Cardiac computed tomography. Proc. IEEE. 1983; 71: 298-307.
- Marcus M. L., Rumberger J. A., Stark G. A. et al. Cardiac applications of ultrafast computed tomography. Am. J. Cardiac Imag. 1988; 2: 116-121.
- Chomka E. V., Brundage В. Н. Cardiovascular ultrafast computed tomographic angiography. Ibid. 1993;7: 252-264.
- Miihlenkamp S., Lerman L. O., Lerman A. et al. Minimally invasive evaluation of coronary microvascular function by electron beam computed tomography. Circulation 2000; 102: 2411-2416.
- Brundage B. H., Upton M. J., Herfkens R. J. et al. Detection of patent coronary bypass grafts by computed tomography: A preliminary report. Ibid. 1980; 61: 826-831.
- Achenbach S., Moshage W., Ropers D. et al. Noninvasive, three-dimensional visualization of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by electron beam tomography. Am. J. Cardiol. 1997; 79: 856-861.
- Knollmann F. D., Basic M., Zurbriigg H. R. et al. Elektronenstrahl-Computertomographie in der Herzchirurgie. Radiologe 1998; 38: 1045-1053.
- Motwani J. C., Topol E. J. Aortocoronary safenous vein graft disease. Pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation 1998; 97: 916-931.
- Kolessov V. I. Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1967; 54: 535-544.
- Campeau L., Enjalbert M., Lesperance J. et al. The relation of risk factors to the development of atherosclerosis in saphenous vein bypass grafts and the progession of disease in the native circulation: a study 10 years after aortocoronary bypass surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 1984; 311: 1329-1332.
- Bourassa M. G. Fate of venous grafts: The past, the present and the future. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1991; 1 (5): 1081-1083.
- Fitzgibbon G. M., Kafka N. P., Leach A. J. et al. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. Ibid. 1996; 28: 616-626.